similar to: Bug#1095623: bookworm-pu: package xen/4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-2

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bookworm to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:42:25 +0100 Source: xen Architecture: source Version: 4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-2 Distribution: bookworm Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>

xen - increase LZMA_BLOCK_SIZE === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available URL:

xen_4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xen_4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-2.dsc xen_4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

I have just applied this to staging-4.1. Since my own backport and Bastian''s were entirely identical, I haven''t tested it other than to compile it... Thanks, Ian. commit 5e73e3548ce70e433a03843ac4fc21a49277baad Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri Mar 15 18:09:51 2013 +0000 Add DomU xz kernel decompression Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich

Package: src:xen Version: 4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-1 I upgraded from bullseye to bookworm, and now when I try to run any xl command, I get: ERROR: Can't find version 4.14 of xen utils (maybe xen-utils-4.14 was already removed before rebooting out of Xen 4.14), bailing out! xen-utils-4.17 is what is now installed, so why is it complaining about 4.14?

Hi, On 28/12/2024 22:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2024-08-25 at 15:59 +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: >> Hi Adam, >> >> On 8/25/24 15:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> >>> I noticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which >>> claims to have been uploaded by you. >>> >>> I'm afraid that we can't

On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 10:39 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:16 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > anything better would need to be arranged upstream. > > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=de858271c16851d662b26 > 13 > 699401df6ecec8ef8 has now landed upstream, which allows the leaf dir to > be > set at configure time and therefore

On Sun, 2024-08-25 at 15:59 +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On 8/25/24 15:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > I noticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which > > claims to have been uploaded by you. > > > > I'm afraid that we can't accept it currently, because it is a newer > > version than is currently

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-1+deb12u1 Severity: normal two issues with block-iscsi 1. If the iqn that is being used as a disk device is a prefix of an existing in use iqn then xl create will fail with libxl: error: libxl_device.c:1337:device_hotplug_child_death_cb: script: Device already opened My fix is to match a space before and after the iqn. iscsiadm -m

Hi Damien, On Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2025 00:08:24 CET Damien Norris wrote: [...] > > All this left me with an incomplete grub config after xen-create-image > was finished, so pvgrub will not boot it. > > Currently xen-create-image installs 6.1.0-29 kernel (because it's not > looking at bookworm-updates by default) so this problem is recoverable; > boot in pygrub and

Moritz Muehlenhoff writes ("Re: Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214"): > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 05:59:18PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Should I put jessie-security in the debian/changelog and dgit push it > > (ie, from many people's pov, dput it) ? > > Yes, the distribution line should be jessie-security, but please send > a

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org at packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Please unblock package xen-api. The PAM fix which we did for version 1.3.2-10 wasn't correct, and thanks to the help of Steve Langasek, we have it in a good shape now. The details of the conversation is available in the Ubuntu BTS here:

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org at packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: xen at packages.debian.org, team at security.debian.org, maxi at daemonizer.de Control: affects -1 + src:xen Please unblock package xen. [ Reason ] Xen in bookworm is currently affected by CVE-2022-42335 and CVE-2022-42336 (see #1034842 and #1036298). [ Impact ] The

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 19:10 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > If somebody is still running wheezy for their dom0 (host) environment > and they are using jessie or other systems with grub2 in their VMs, they > can't boot their VM. > > A rather trivial 1-line fix in the dom0 (host) system fixes the problem. > > Please advise if the release team

Hi Adam, On 8/25/24 15:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I noticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which > claims to have been uploaded by you. > > I'm afraid that we can't accept it currently, because it is a newer > version than is currently in unstable and testing: > > xen | 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 | stable |

On 14/05/16 19:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 19:10 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> If somebody is still running wheezy for their dom0 (host) environment >> and they are using jessie or other systems with grub2 in their VMs, they >> can't boot their VM. >> >> A rather trivial 1-line fix in the dom0

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: wheezy User: release.debian.org at packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org If somebody is still running wheezy for their dom0 (host) environment and they are using jessie or other systems with grub2 in their VMs, they can't boot their VM. A rather trivial 1-line fix in the dom0 (host) system

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal The current README.Debian is quite old It gives some advice that will lead to people having a broken system (e.g. no networking). It describes a procedure for configuring networking that is completely opposite to what has been described more recently on the upstream mailing list http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702337 I'm happy

On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 15:16 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > anything better would need to be arranged upstream. http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=de858271c16851d662b2613 699401df6ecec8ef8 has now landed upstream, which allows the leaf dir to be set at configure time and therefore allows the packaging to avoid patching some stuff. HVM guests have been broken in Stretch for ages

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102192 Bug ID: 102192 Summary: Dell XPS 15 9560: PU: 1 PID: 58 at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/gf100.c:190 gf100_vm_flush+0x1b3/0x1c0 [nouveau] Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All)