similar to: [MailServer Resend] Quarantined email -- use caution when opening.Re: [PATCH 5/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.

For virtualization, we've developed virtio_ring for efficient communication. This would also work well for userspace-kernel communication, particularly for things like the tun device. By using the same ABI, we can join guests to the host kernel trivially. These patches are fairly alpha; I've seen some network stalls I have to track down and there are some fixmes. Comments welcome!

For virtualization, we've developed virtio_ring for efficient communication. This would also work well for userspace-kernel communication, particularly for things like the tun device. By using the same ABI, we can join guests to the host kernel trivially. These patches are fairly alpha; I've seen some network stalls I have to track down and there are some fixmes. Comments welcome!

The message "rsync@lists.samba.org" from Mail Delivery Subsystem, sent on 14/07/2005 00:11 was quarantined because it contained either an executable file, a batch file or a screen saver file. All of these types of attachments are considered security risks. Please consult your mail administrator who can release the message.

The message "Returned mail: Data format error" from Bounced mail, sent on 3/9/2006 10:47 was quarantined because it contained either an executable file, a batch file or a screen saver file. All of these types of attachments are considered security risks. Please consult your mail administrator who can release the message. This message was checked by MailScan for WorkgroupMail.

The message "Message could not be delivered" from , sent on 3/30/2006 11:52 was quarantined because it contained either an executable file, a batch file or a screen saver file. All of these types of attachments are considered security risks. Please consult your mail administrator who can release the message. This message was checked by MailScan for WorkgroupMail. www.workgroupmail.com

----- Forwarded by FWSDevelopment/FWS/DOI on 02/25/2003 03:45 PM ----- |---------+----------------------------------------------> | | "Florian Stahl" | | | <fstahl@xantury.com> | | | Sent by: | | | samba-bounces+ascannel=fws.gov@list| | |

Still trying to make my Asterisk PBK talk to our Nortel Phone Switch (C15k). Nortel did an upgrade which changed a bunch of things today, so I thought I'd give it another shot. It looks like I'm much closer this time, but still no go. Can't do calling in either direction. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks! Shawn [nortel] host=10.0.0.10 insecure=very type=peer qualify=no

Dear All, I am using Silhouette to estimate the number of clusters in a microarray dataset. Initially, I used the iris data to test my piece of code as follows: library(cluster) data(iris) mydata<-iris[,1:4] maxk<-15 # at most 15 clusters myindex<-rep(0,maxk) # hold the si values for each k clusters mdist<-1-cor(t(mydata)) #dissimlarity

I have installed an Asterisk 1.4 on Suse93 using a FritzCard. Some calls are logged to the ISDN log, but Asterisk is not detecting incoming calls. I wonder whether some other device or process is preventing Asterisk from gaining access to the isdn line? Is there some way to ensure that only Asterisk can listening to the line, or get it to share the line with some other device, such as the fax

kvm (and lguest!) want to get more speed out of the tun device. We already have an ABI for guest<->host comms, called virtio_ring; extending tun to understand this (with its async nature and batching) make for an efficient network. But moreover: the same things that make virtio a good guest<->host transport make it appealing as a userspace<->kernel transport. So rather

kvm (and lguest!) want to get more speed out of the tun device. We already have an ABI for guest<->host comms, called virtio_ring; extending tun to understand this (with its async nature and batching) make for an efficient network. But moreover: the same things that make virtio a good guest<->host transport make it appealing as a userspace<->kernel transport. So rather

[asterisk-users] Asterisk <-> Nortel Phone Switch Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:52:17 +0000 (GMT) X-Mailer: sendEmail-1.52 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----MIME delimiter for sendEmail-20854.4017086787" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. To properly display this message you need a MIME-Version 1.0 compliant Email program. ------MIME delimiter

Please see the following thread to get some context on this http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121564433018903&w=2 Basically the issue is that current multi-cast filtering stuff in the TUN/TAP driver is seriously broken. Original patch went in without proper review and ACK. It was broken and confusing to start with and subsequent patches broke it completely. To give you an idea of

Please see the following thread to get some context on this http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121564433018903&w=2 Basically the issue is that current multi-cast filtering stuff in the TUN/TAP driver is seriously broken. Original patch went in without proper review and ACK. It was broken and confusing to start with and subsequent patches broke it completely. To give you an idea of

Dear R users, i am using locfit package developed by loader in R software, my problem is that as i am doing independont forecast using locfit object , i am able to do independont forecast for more than one years simultaniously. But when i am doing one year forecast(single) this code is giving following error... "Warning message: 'newdata' had 1 rows but variable(s) found have 24

The problem with introducing checksum offload and gso to tun is they need to set dev->features to enable GSO and/or checksumming, which is supposed to be done before register_netdevice(), ie. as part of TUNSETIFF. Unfortunately, TUNSETIFF has always just ignored flags it doesn't understand, so there's no good way of detecting whether the kernel supports new IFF_ flags. This patch

The problem with introducing checksum offload and gso to tun is they need to set dev->features to enable GSO and/or checksumming, which is supposed to be done before register_netdevice(), ie. as part of TUNSETIFF. Unfortunately, TUNSETIFF has always just ignored flags it doesn't understand, so there's no good way of detecting whether the kernel supports new IFF_ flags. This patch

Hi In my mailscanner, i have mail in quarantine folder. How can I get back attachement in quarantine folder? I use mail user < message. but the attachment is just coding not the attachment thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081001/e9a9ceb5/attachment-0004.html>

This file, which was attached to the message titled "R-help Digest, Vol 4, Issue 25" by "r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch" and was quarantined on 6/25/2003 3:18 AM, has been released. NOTE: If AutoProtect is enabled, then this restored attachment will be rescanned during the restore. If the attachment is still infected, the current virus detection policy will apply to this

Yesterday while fixing xoff stuckiness issue in the TUN/TAP driver I got a chance to look into the multicast filtering code in there. And immediately realized how terribly broken & confusing it is. The patch was originally done by Shaun (CC'ed) and went in without any proper ACK from me, Dave or Jeff. Here is the original ref