similar to: [PATCH 1/3] virtio: VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY to force callback on empty

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[PATCH 1/3] virtio: VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY to force callback on empty"

2009 May 29
0
[PATCH 4/4] lguest: don't force VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY
VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY indicates to the Guest that we will hit them with an interrupt every time the xmit queue is emptied. Because it results in lots of tx interrupts, modern Guests probably don't want it, so let's only force it when they accept the option. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> --- Documentation/lguest/lguest.c | 27
2009 May 29
0
[PATCH 4/4] lguest: don't force VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY
VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY indicates to the Guest that we will hit them with an interrupt every time the xmit queue is emptied. Because it results in lots of tx interrupts, modern Guests probably don't want it, so let's only force it when they accept the option. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> --- Documentation/lguest/lguest.c | 27
2009 Sep 21
0
[PATCH 5/5] lguest: don't force VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY
VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY indicates to the Guest that we will hit them with an interrupt every time the xmit queue is emptied. Because it results in lots of tx interrupts, modern Guests probably don't want it, so let's only force it when they accept the option. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> --- Documentation/lguest/lguest.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
2009 Sep 21
0
[PATCH 5/5] lguest: don't force VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY
VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY indicates to the Guest that we will hit them with an interrupt every time the xmit queue is emptied. Because it results in lots of tx interrupts, modern Guests probably don't want it, so let's only force it when they accept the option. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> --- Documentation/lguest/lguest.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
2007 Dec 14
3
virtio_net and SMP guests
Rusty, Anthony, Dor, I need your brain power :-) On smp guests I have seen a problem with virtio (the version in curent Avi's git) which do not occur on single processor guests: kernel BUG at /space/kvm/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:228! illegal operation: 0001 [#1] Modules linked in: ipv6 CPU: 2 Not tainted Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 000000000f83e038, ksp: 000000000f877d70) Krnl
2007 Dec 14
3
virtio_net and SMP guests
Rusty, Anthony, Dor, I need your brain power :-) On smp guests I have seen a problem with virtio (the version in curent Avi's git) which do not occur on single processor guests: kernel BUG at /space/kvm/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:228! illegal operation: 0001 [#1] Modules linked in: ipv6 CPU: 2 Not tainted Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 000000000f83e038, ksp: 000000000f877d70) Krnl
2007 Nov 10
2
[PATCH] Change virtio_pci to use a shared memory area for config
This patch changes virtio_pci to use a shared memory area for virtio config info instead of using the PCI configuration space. This is closer semantically to what the virtio API exposes and is it a lot easier to implement on both ends. Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c index eb9a8e0..7e6e453 100644
2007 Nov 10
2
[PATCH] Change virtio_pci to use a shared memory area for config
This patch changes virtio_pci to use a shared memory area for virtio config info instead of using the PCI configuration space. This is closer semantically to what the virtio API exposes and is it a lot easier to implement on both ends. Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c index eb9a8e0..7e6e453 100644
2014 Oct 07
14
[PATCH RFC 00/11] linux: towards virtio-1 guest support
This patchset tries to go towards implementing both virtio-1 compliant and transitional virtio drivers in Linux. Branch available at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux virtio-1 This is based on some old patches by Rusty to handle extended feature bits and endianness conversions. Thomas implemented the new virtio-ccw transport revision command, and I hacked up some
2014 Oct 07
14
[PATCH RFC 00/11] linux: towards virtio-1 guest support
This patchset tries to go towards implementing both virtio-1 compliant and transitional virtio drivers in Linux. Branch available at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux virtio-1 This is based on some old patches by Rusty to handle extended feature bits and endianness conversions. Thomas implemented the new virtio-ccw transport revision command, and I hacked up some
2011 May 19
22
[PATCHv2 00/14] virtio and vhost-net performance enhancements
OK, here is the large patchset that implements the virtio spec update that I sent earlier (the spec itself needs a minor update, will send that out too next week, but I think we are on the same page here already). It supercedes the PUBLISH_USED_IDX patches I sent out earlier. What will follow will be a patchset that actually includes 4 sets of patches. I note below their status. Please consider
2011 May 19
22
[PATCHv2 00/14] virtio and vhost-net performance enhancements
OK, here is the large patchset that implements the virtio spec update that I sent earlier (the spec itself needs a minor update, will send that out too next week, but I think we are on the same page here already). It supercedes the PUBLISH_USED_IDX patches I sent out earlier. What will follow will be a patchset that actually includes 4 sets of patches. I note below their status. Please consider
2011 May 04
27
[PATCH 00/18] virtio and vhost-net performance enhancements
OK, here's a large patchset that implements the virtio spec update that I sent earlier. It supercedes the PUBLISH_USED_IDX patches I sent out earlier. I know it's a lot to ask but please test, and please consider for 2.6.40 :) I see nice performance improvements: one run showed going from 12 to 18 Gbit/s host to guest with netperf, but I did not spend a lot of time testing performance,
2011 May 04
27
[PATCH 00/18] virtio and vhost-net performance enhancements
OK, here's a large patchset that implements the virtio spec update that I sent earlier. It supercedes the PUBLISH_USED_IDX patches I sent out earlier. I know it's a lot to ask but please test, and please consider for 2.6.40 :) I see nice performance improvements: one run showed going from 12 to 18 Gbit/s host to guest with netperf, but I did not spend a lot of time testing performance,
2013 Apr 05
8
[PATCH 0/7] virtio cleanups
Aiming these for coming merge window. Nothing should change, but get ready for a non-guest-endian config transports, and > 32 features bits. Final one is just an overdue consolidation. Cheers, Rusty. Rusty Russell (7): virtio_config: introduce size-based accessors. virtio: use size-based config accessors. virtio_config: helpers for non-converting accessors. virtio_config: make
2013 Apr 05
8
[PATCH 0/7] virtio cleanups
Aiming these for coming merge window. Nothing should change, but get ready for a non-guest-endian config transports, and > 32 features bits. Final one is just an overdue consolidation. Cheers, Rusty. Rusty Russell (7): virtio_config: introduce size-based accessors. virtio: use size-based config accessors. virtio_config: helpers for non-converting accessors. virtio_config: make
2008 Jun 25
3
[PATCH 1/4] tun: Interface to query tun/tap features.
The problem with introducing checksum offload and gso to tun is they need to set dev->features to enable GSO and/or checksumming, which is supposed to be done before register_netdevice(), ie. as part of TUNSETIFF. Unfortunately, TUNSETIFF has always just ignored flags it doesn't understand, so there's no good way of detecting whether the kernel supports new IFF_ flags. This patch
2008 Jun 25
3
[PATCH 1/4] tun: Interface to query tun/tap features.
The problem with introducing checksum offload and gso to tun is they need to set dev->features to enable GSO and/or checksumming, which is supposed to be done before register_netdevice(), ie. as part of TUNSETIFF. Unfortunately, TUNSETIFF has always just ignored flags it doesn't understand, so there's no good way of detecting whether the kernel supports new IFF_ flags. This patch
2009 Aug 19
1
[PATCHv4 2/2] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server
What it is: vhost net is a character device that can be used to reduce the number of system calls involved in virtio networking. Existing virtio net code is used in the guest without modification. There's similarity with vringfd, with some differences and reduced scope - uses eventfd for signalling - structures can be moved around in memory at any time (good for migration) - support memory
2009 Aug 19
1
[PATCHv4 2/2] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server
What it is: vhost net is a character device that can be used to reduce the number of system calls involved in virtio networking. Existing virtio net code is used in the guest without modification. There's similarity with vringfd, with some differences and reduced scope - uses eventfd for signalling - structures can be moved around in memory at any time (good for migration) - support memory