similar to: Glusterfs mounts on clients with few bricks missing

Hey Shreyansh, is this eventually happening if one node is going down/gluster service restart while the client has the volume mounted? I think I am experiencing something similar for my VM disks, when I restart a node/glusterd. I only can fix it by re-mounting the client. I believe the change of brick-ports of the newley restarted node/service is not being populated to the client, but all other

Hello everyone -- I am stumped on this issue, mostly because I'm not quite sure if it's behaving correctly or not. I believe this used to work and right now I'm not quite sure why it's no longer doing so and how to fix it (if possible). I suspect it is because of my recent update of the OS and Samba version. When users are trying to follow a symlink that goes to a different

Hello all, We have a distributed volume running in 7 hosts and 28 bricks. We've been experiencing some strange behaviors over the time, some of them are solved when the gluster services are restarted, but other problems persist. In the case below, and this one happens many times, some people access the gluster filesystem via Samba. They have a mapped drive in their windows machine.

Okay, this problem is solved. It turns out when I was doing the wide links and unix extensions option it really was working. It wasn't until I logged out and logged back in to the client to get a fresh smb connection that it worked. So I'm good. Thanks for the help everyone. I appreciate it. Kathy On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Kathy <banshee135 at gmail.com> wrote: >

Hi, I have a gluster volume that consists of 22Bricks and includes a single folder with 3.6 Million files. Yesterday the volume crashed and turned out to be completely unresposible and I was forced to perform a hard reboot on all gluster servers because they were not able to execute a reboot command issued by the shell because they were that heavy overloaded. Each gluster server has 12 CPU cores

Hi, I noticed when I run gluster volume heal data info, the follow message shows up in the log, along with other stuff: [dht-selfheal.c:2328:dht_selfheal_directory] 0-data-dht: Directory selfheal > failed: Unable to form layout for directory / I'm seeing it on Gluster 4.0.1 and 3.13.2. Here's the full log after running heal info:

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Artem Russakovskii <archon810 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed when I run gluster volume heal data info, the follow message > shows up in the log, along with other stuff: > > [dht-selfheal.c:2328:dht_selfheal_directory] 0-data-dht: Directory >> selfheal failed: Unable to form layout for directory / > > > I'm

Hi, I see a lot of the following messages in the logs: [2018-02-04 03:22:01.544446] I [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1821:mgmt_getspec_cbk] 0-glusterfs: No change in volfile,continuing [2018-02-04 07:41:16.189349] W [MSGID: 109011] [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 48-gv0-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 122440868 [2018-02-04 07:41:16.244261] W [fuse-bridge.c:2398:fuse_writev_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse:

On 5 February 2018 at 15:40, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I see a lot of the following messages in the logs: > [2018-02-04 03:22:01.544446] I [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1821:mgmt_getspec_cbk] > 0-glusterfs: No change in volfile,continuing > [2018-02-04 07:41:16.189349] W [MSGID: 109011] > [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 48-gv0-dht: no

Hello Nithya! Thank you so much, I think we are close to build a stable storage solution according to your recommendations. Here's our rebalance log - please don't pay attention to error messages after 9AM - this is when we manually destroyed volume to recreate it for further testing. Also all remove-brick operations you could see in the log were executed manually when recreating volume.

Hello Nithya! Thank you for your help on figuring this out! We changed our configuration and after having a successful test yesterday we have run into new issue today. The test including moderate read/write (~20-30 Mb/s) and scaling the storage was running about 3 hours and at some moment system got stuck: On the user level there are such errors when trying to work with filesystem: OSError:

resending mail from another id, doubt on whether mail reaches mailing list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com<mailto:amudhan83 at gmail.com>> Date: Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:43 PM Subject: error logged in fuse-mount log file To: Gluster Users <gluster-users at gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users at gluster.org>> Hi, I am using

Hi Nithya, I have checked gfid in all the bricks in disperse set for the folder. it all same there is no difference. regards Amudhan P On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Comments inline. > > Regards, > Nithya > > On 9 November 2017 at 15:05, Amudhan Pandian <amudh_an at hotmail.com> wrote: >

Hi ,all We found a strange problem. Some clients worked normally while some clients couldn't access sepcial files. For exmaple, Client A couldn't create the directory xxx, but Client B could. However, if Client B created the directory, Client A could acess it and even deleted it. But Client A still couldn't create the same directory later. If I changed the directory name, Client A

Hi, Comments inline. Regards, Nithya On 9 November 2017 at 15:05, Amudhan Pandian <amudh_an at hotmail.com> wrote: > resending mail from another id, doubt on whether mail reaches mailing list. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Amudhan P* <amudhan83 at gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:43 PM > Subject: error logged in fuse-mount log

I remember we have fixed 2 issues where such kind of error messages were coming and also we were seeing issues on mount. In one of the case the problem was in dht. Unfortunately, I don't remember the BZ's for those issues. As glusterfs 3.10.1 is an old version, I would request you to please upgrade it to latest one. I am sure this would have fix . ---- Ashish ----- Original

Adding Ashish . Hi Amudhan, Can you check the gfids for every dir in that heirarchy? Maybe one of the parent dirs has a gfid mismatch. Regards, Nithya On 13 November 2017 at 17:39, Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I have checked gfid in all the bricks in disperse set for the folder. it > all same there is no difference. > > regards >

On 14 November 2017 at 08:36, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at redhat.com> wrote: > > I remember we have fixed 2 issues where such kind of error messages were > coming and also we were seeing issues on mount. > In one of the case the problem was in dht. Unfortunately, I don't > remember the BZ's for those issues. > I think the DHT BZ you are referring to 1438423

Hi, I am using glusterfs 3.10.1 and i am seeing below msg in fuse-mount log file. what does this error mean? should i worry about this and how do i resolve this? [2017-11-07 11:59:17.218973] W [MSGID: 109005] [dht-selfheal.c:2113:dht_selfheal_directory] 0-glustervol-dht: Directory selfheal fail ed : 1 subvolumes have unrecoverable errors. path = /fol1/fol2/fol3/fol4/fol5, gfid

This looks like there could be some some problem requesting / leaking / whatever memory but without looking at the core its tought to tell for sure. Note: /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(_gf_msg_backtrace_nomem+0x78)[0x7f95bc54e618] Can you open up a bugzilla and get us the core file to review? -b ----- Original Message ----- > From: "???" <21291285 at qq.com> > To: