similar to: Regarding Samba Shares

Hi Srikanth, On 1/22/25 11:52 AM, ., Srikanth N S via samba wrote: > Could you please let us know if this is an expected behavior? Or do > we have to make any configuration changes to reflect the changes to > share permissions immediately on the SMB clients. iirc that is just current behaviour. We call check_user_share_access() only from make_connection_snum() and never update it

Hello, changing the permissions on the underlying filesystem leads to an immediate change. Hope this helps! Am 22.01.25 um 12:15 schrieb Ralph Boehme via samba: > Hi Srikanth, > > On 1/22/25 11:52 AM, ., Srikanth N S via samba wrote: >> Could you please let us know if this is an expected behavior? Or do >> we have to make any configuration changes to reflect the changes to

Thanks for the replies. We were referring to changing the Samba share configuration. For eg in the below-mentioned share configuration [share1] path = /mnt/share1 read only = no writable = no map readonly = yes If we change writable to ?yes? then it does not get reflected immediately. Similarly for eg in case of dynamic share if we change the permission using

Hi Duncan Sands, I frankly don't know what a variable gets converted to (SSA register or memory chunk). What I meant is, for example I1: int i, j=10; I2: scanf("%d", &j); I3: i = j + 1; Here I want to know whether the value of j in I1 reaches I3 or not. Best Regards, Srikanth Vaindam you didn't define what you mean by a variable. LLVM has virtual registers which are

Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny <at> googlemail.com> writes: > > On 13/01/15 11:48, srikanth <at> icat.ac.in wrote: > > Dear Samba Team, > > First of all Thank you for Implementing samba4 version > > with RSAT it was very useful in our environment.we have > > configured samba4 with RSAT in our college it was working > > for the

Hello Gurus, Greetings. I have been assigned some work on the development of a migration tool. The requirement is that it has to migrate the data on a UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem. What are the technical apects I will have to look into to achieve the same? Is it possible to change the on-disk structure of the UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem? The question may

Hi all, I want to allocate bandwidth for ipsec interface using CBQ/tc. Suppose the conf. file is like this, DEVICE=ipsec0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=128Kbit WEIGHT=10Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=192.128.1.0/24 Does it work or What else options need to be taken care like ipsec packets/protocol/port # etc.? C''d anybody suggest please? regds, Srikanth. _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hi, I need to find out all the places where the value of a variable is being used. For this I have to implement reaching definitions(def-use chains). When I searched for its implementation I found Iterating over def-use & use-def chains <http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#iterate_chains>. will this work for finding the places where a variable is reaching? I tried to use

Dear Samba Team, First of all Thank you for Implementing samba4 version with RSAT it was very useful in our environment.we have configured samba4 with RSAT in our college it was working for the past 5 to 6 weeks and then later we are facing the problem in accessing sharing folder i am getting error "security id structure is invalid" is there any solution for this

Hi, Any body having idea to find the NIC Capacity / BW (10 / 100 Mbps) ? Whether the interface may be eth0/eth1/ppp0 or some other. Is there any related IOCTL avialable, if so just give the linux-2.4.18 file path. thanks, Srikanth. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, I am an engineering student in IIT Guwahati, India. Currently, as a summer project I am working on 'packet loss concealment in voip scenario'. I am eager to know what PLC methods are used at receiver end of speex decoder. And if I could develop some more efficient method I could able to contribute to the speex. Actually, I searched the whole speex manual but failed to find what

Hi, I am trying to build llvm 3.4.2 on Centos 6.6. I am getting this below build error , while building the libcxx. I followed the build procedure based of http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html. I cannot move to a higher version, Since we need to develop on CentOS 6.6 and LLVM 3.4.2 ,is the last version that supports gcc 3.4.2. Starting from LLVM 3.5.0, there has been a huge jump to gcc 4.7.0.

Sub:[LARTC] cbq init for one port on a subnet Hello, We use cbq.init to limit bandwidth. It works great on a per-user basis. Now I''d like to limit traffic from a netblock to the Internet on port 6699. Network is 192.168.0.160 mask 255.255.255.224 eth0 is the gateway eth1 connects the netblock in question Is this the proper syntax; DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=100Kbit

Hi, The CBQ config file shud be some thing like this. DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=50Kbit WEIGHT=5Kbit Shall i hardcode the DEVICE BW as 10/100 Mbit or Shall i use any other tool like ethtool for getting this. ethtool gives Speed: 10Mbps If so, how about, if i use some other Interfaces other than eth0, like ppp0 or some other? C''d anybody can give a suggestion over this? thanks

[1]Click here to unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receive our emails Dear Recruiter, Let me present you with list of consultants currently available. E-Mail me for below candidate details. My Mail ID : srikanth at codeforce.com Consultant Job Title Total Experience Current Location Availability Action Atrayee Paul Sr. ETL Datastage Developer 7 years Detroit Metro Area

Hi, Can we upgrade the OpenSSL version on earlier CentOS Versions 6.2/6.3/6.4 with the latest Openssl version which has all the latest openssl vulnerability fixes from Cent OS repo. Will there be any dependency with the openssl version with CentOS versions upgrading openssl 1.0.0 to openssl 1.0.1e latest version. Can we upgrade with the latest OPENSSL version on older CentOS Versions as there

Hi, I've just signed the following petition "Shri. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister - Government of India : Save RTI Act from Amendments " and wanted to see if you could help by adding your name. Our goal is to reach 15,000 signatures and we need more support. You can read more and sign the petition here:

> > No, you have hit a known bug. The 'idmap config ' work done for 4.6.0 > seems to be causing this, you can safely ignore this error. Ok Rowland, thanks!! Mas mesmo conseguindo corrigir os problemas acima, não consigo ter acesso a aba security com o usuario administrator. Verificando nos logs, aparece a mensagem abaixo. On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Rowland Penny via

On 30.01.2024 16:51, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > On 1/30/24 16:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:13:41 +0100 >> Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces >>> Windows compatibility when defined

Yes, in my opinion quite an arrogancy... This is the translation of what I got from the supporter: "Our developers have discussed and have concluded that we stand by our previous statement and define the problem as a problem of Samba AD Server (4.17.*). Although Synology is an open source product based on Samba, but we don't always stick to it and adapt our own code in many