Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Sad news: Steve Langasek has passed away."
2010 May 04
0
cifs-utils 4.1 in Debian lenny backports
(this mail is crossposted to 4 mailing lists, some of which being
subscribers-only. Please consider this when answering if you need to)
Let's see this as my first achievement of SambaXP
(http://www.sambaxp.org).
An "official" backport of cifs-utils
(http://www.samba.org/linux-cifs/cifs-utils/) is now available for
users of Debian lenny.
This package can be found on backports.org,
2013 Jan 15
0
Call for Papers SambaXP 2013
samba eXPerience 2013 - call for papers
---------------------------------------
The SAMBA 4 birthday event!
From May 14th to 17th 2013 developers and users will meet again in
Goettingen, Germany at the 12th international SAMBA conference, the
"samba eXPerience 2013".
The first Linux distro released with SAMBA 4 with an Active Directory
controller included is of course the highlight of
2024 Oct 01
1
SambaXP 2025
Dear Samba users and hackers,
I'm excited to announce that SambaXP 2025 will take place on April 9th
and 10th on-site in G?ttingen, Germany once again. This annual event
promises to bring together Samba enthusiasts and experts for an
interesting and enjoyable two-day conference.
Early-Bird Tickets are now available here: https://sambaxp.org/
The call for papers is already open and we
2019 Nov 19
2
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
David,
I'm glad you mentioned Discord's T&Cs. I'm not generally concerned about these kinds of things, but Discord's seems particularly aggressive. Particularly the phrase "perpetual, nonexclusive, transferable, royalty-free, sublicensable, and worldwide license" is... a lot. Since LLVM is a permissively licensed project I assume many of our contributors care about
2019 Nov 20
4
[cfe-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
There *are* open-source Discord clients, 3rd party tools and the like. The
corporation behind Discord is just not authorising you legally to use any
of those tools at hand. There are rarely any technical barriers or
countermeasures, though.
Roman Lebedev via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2019.
nov. 18., H, 16:08):
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:10 PM Nico Weber via
2019 Nov 18
3
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:32 AM David Tellenbach via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> +1 from my side for using "faster" or "more direct" communication channels
> such
> as Discord (no strong opinion on the choice of any particular tool here)
> for
> informal chats and discussions on a "support level". This is
2019 Nov 19
2
Fwd: RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
On 11/19/19 9:09 AM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev wrote:
Note there is also Slack, which does not have these problems. Not sure why that keeps being overlooked
My understanding is this is because Slack does not have good moderation tools. I'm unfamiliar with further details in this regard.
-Hal
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 7:07 AM Zachary Turner <zturner at roblox.com<mailto:zturner at
2019 Nov 18
5
[cfe-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
FWIW I'm a fan of using open-source stuff for open-source projects.
Discourse looks open source, but Discord doesn't as far as I can tell (?).
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:15 AM Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I sent the message quoted below to llvm-dev@ just now, but it applies to
> the whole community so sending an FYI
2019 Nov 18
2
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
>
> | mailing lists for longer-form discussions are unfamiliar, difficult,
> and often intimidating for newcomers
>
> Um… what? While I know (via my own children) that folks nowadays use
> multiple avenues of communication, it’s **really** hard to imagine email
> as a **mechanism** being unfamiliar/difficult/intimidating. Moving to a
> new mechanism wouldn’t alter the
2020 Aug 04
2
Discourse category for the AMDGPU target
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 7:00 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have much personal interest here - but my understanding was
> that there was/is a fair bit of pushback to fragmenting the
> communications channels to discord before there's a more general
> buy-in to switch over across the project? (perhaps I'm misremembering
> the previous
2019 Nov 18
5
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
The lists are working well for the people who are already invested in the
community though - as was identified by Chandler they aren't working as
well for new people.
I'm an insanely confident Scotsman with just about zero fear of any/all
social situations, and I've always found this mailing list to be utterly
terrifying (thus I've been a 10 year mostly-lurker).
My fear
2020 Jun 03
2
[PROPOSAL] Introduce a new LLVM process to resolve contentious decisions
On Jun 2, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote:
> This was a mistake, fixed.
>
> I missed that this was changed, I was excited about a Discourse category for this! In particular the second point of the doc points at llvm-dev@ being a problem as the current forum for such discussions.
> If Discourse is a no-go (?), then having a separate mailing-list would
2011 Feb 16
2
fwd: fix up ARM assembly to use 'bx lr' in place of 'mov pc, lr'.
hello vorlon,
got notified of your patch,
will apply next days upstream unless some critiques are voiced on ml.
thanks.
--
maks
----- Forwarded message from Steve Langasek <steve.langasek at canonical.com> -----
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:05:42 -0000
From: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek at canonical.com>
Subject: [Bug 527720] Re: thumb2 porting issues identified: klibc uses
2019 Nov 19
3
Fwd: RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
But is it better or worse than IRC in this regard?
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:49 PM Daniel Chapiesky via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Daniel Chapiesky <dchapiesky2 at gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 1:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for
>
2020 Jul 27
2
Discourse category for the AMDGPU target
Hi all,
We’ve been having discussions over the last few weeks with
stakeholders both inside and outside of AMD about where we could best
have a dedicated and open discussion space for topics around the
AMDGPU target. The conclusion was that we’d like to try the use of a
category in the LLVM Discourse group, which is mostly used for MLIR
discussion so far.
I have started a Discourse topic with
2005 Jun 23
0
Documents and pictures SambaXP 2005
English version below.
Auf
http://www.sambaxp.org/index.php?id=74
sind ab sofort alle Vortr?ge der SambaXP 2005 im PDF- und
OGG-Format, sowie zahlreiche Fotos der Konferenz verf?gbar.
Viel Spa? damit! :-)
SerNet Samba Team
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-- www.sambaxp.org -- www.enterprisesamba.com -- www.sernet.de --
2020 May 11
0
sambaXP 2020 - Online Edition - FOR FREE!
SambaXP 2020 - Online Edition
The 19th International Conference for the open source software Samba
will take place from 26th - 28th May 2020 as an *free* online event. The
planned IO-Lab is cancelled.
SambaXP is the annual meeting of the international Samba team with
developers, users, manufacturers and system integrators within the Samba
ecosystem, which has been held since 2002.
Due to the
2020 Feb 11
1
sambaXP 2020
Hi,
The 19th International User and Developer Conference sambaXP
(https://sambaxp.org/) will take place from 26th - 28th of May 2020 in
G?ttingen, Germany.
If you would like to give a presentation, you can submit your
paper here:
https://sambaxp.org/#c11
Call for paper ends on February 29th.
New for this year's event: the Microsoft SMB3 Interoperability Lab (IO
Lab) from May 24th-29th,
2013 Feb 01
0
qdap 0.2.0 released
qdap (Quantitative Discourse Analysis Package) is an R package designed to assist in quantitative discourse analysis. The package stands as a bridge between qualitative transcripts of dialogue and statistical analysis and visualization.
This is the first CRAN release of qdap:?http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/qdap/index.html
The qdap package automates many of the tasks associated with
2013 Feb 01
0
qdap 0.2.0 released
qdap (Quantitative Discourse Analysis Package) is an R package designed to assist in quantitative discourse analysis. The package stands as a bridge between qualitative transcripts of dialogue and statistical analysis and visualization.
This is the first CRAN release of qdap:?http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/qdap/index.html
The qdap package automates many of the tasks associated with