similar to: xen_4.17.5-1~deb12u1_source.changes REJECTED

Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed. binary:libxencall1 is NEW. binary:libxendevicemodel1 is NEW. binary:libxenevtchn1 is NEW. binary:libxenforeignmemory1 is NEW. binary:libxengnttab1 is NEW. binary:libxenhypfs1 is NEW. binary:libxenstore4 is NEW. binary:libxentoolcore1 is NEW. binary:libxentoollog1 is NEW. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why

Hi Ian, On 05-02-2023 14:06, Ian Jackson wrote: > Sorry again for being an idiot, but where should we have checked, to > avoid such a mistake in the future ? I thought this kind of thing > would appear on tracker but > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xen > doesn't show it now. ocaml is a bit weird, it has a permanent tracker:

xen source: lintian output: 'license-problem-gfdl-invariants stubdom/grub.patches/00cvs invariant part is: with no invariant sections, with the front-cover texts being a gnu manual, and with the back-cover texts as in (a) below', automatically rejected package. xen source: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. xen-utils-4.11: lintian output:

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: xen-3 | 3.4.3-1 | source xen-docs-3.4 | 3.4.3-1 | all xen-hypervisor-3.4-amd64 | 3.4.3-1 | amd64, i386 xen-hypervisor-3.4-i386 | 3.4.3-1 | i386 xen-utils-3.4 | 3.4.3-1 | amd64, i386 ------------------- Reason ------------------- ROM; Superseeded by xen

Reject Reasons: xen-utils-4.1: lintian output: 'statically-linked-binary ./usr/lib/xen-4.1/boot/hvmloader', automatically rejected package. xen-utils-4.1: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

xen source: lintian output: 'missing-build-dependency dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~)', automatically rejected package. xen source: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

Hi Maximilian, there is an ocaml stack rebuild[1] at them moment, where xen is a part of. So please upload to experimental. Thanks! Thorsten [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

Reject Reasons: xcp-xe_1.3-14_amd64.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [<type 'exceptions.NameError'>: global name 'MTime' is not defined] xcp-squeezed_1.3-14_amd64.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [<type 'exceptions.NameError'>: global name 'MTime' is not defined] python-xenapi_1.3-14_all.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [<type

Reject Reasons: xcp-xapi_1.3-15_amd64.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [<type 'exceptions.NameError'>: global name 'Name' is not defined] libxenapi-ocaml-dev_1.3-15_amd64.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [<type 'exceptions.NameError'>: global name 'Name' is not defined] xcp-v6d_1.3-15_amd64.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed

Version check failed (source=xen, version=4.0.1-5.3, other-version=4.0.1-5.3, suite=proposed-updates) === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

The CRAN package snow is superseded by the parallel package which is distributed with R since version 2.14.0. Here are the release notes \item There is a new package \pkg{parallel}. It incorporates (slightly revised) copies of packages \CRANpkg{multicore} and \CRANpkg{snow} (excluding MPI, PVM and NWS clusters). Code written to use the higher-level API functions in those packages should

Oh, I completely missed that one. It's very neat as it seems to work both on Windows and Unix. Thanks! Xavier On 10/02/15 10:52, Martyn Plummer wrote: > The CRAN package snow is superseded by the parallel package which is > distributed with R since version 2.14.0. Here are the release notes > > \item There is a new package \pkg{parallel}. > > It incorporates (slightly

Dear list, When I run an R CMD check --as-cran on my package (pROC) I get the following note: > Uses the superseded package: ?doSNOW? The fact that it uses the doSNOW package is correct as I have the following example in an .Rd file: > #ifdef windows > if (require(doSNOW)) { > registerDoSNOW(cl <- makeCluster(2, type = "SOCK")) > ci(roc2,

Rejected: md5sum for /org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/x/xen-3.0/xen-3.0_3.0.3-0.orig.tar.gz doesn't match xen-3.0_3.0.3-0-2.dsc. Rejected: size for /org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/x/xen-3.0/xen-3.0_3.0.3-0.orig.tar.gz doesn't match xen-3.0_3.0.3-0-2.dsc. Rejected: 'dpkg-source -x' failed for xen-3.0_3.0.3-0-2.dsc [return code: 6400]. [dpkg-source output:] dpkg-source: error:

Rejected: xen_3.0.1-2.dsc refers to xen_3.0.1.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.

Hi Maintainer, rejected, due to incomplete debian/copyright file. There is at least tools/xenstore which has a mixture of LGPL and GP attached, but you never mention that. Another example is tools/vtpm_manager. Please list all different licenses used with their (C) holder. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing,

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748 ------- Additional Comments From baby_p_nut at yahoo.com 2004-05-25 09:20 ------- Patch Name: PHNE_27796 Patch Description: s700_800 11.11 libnss_dns DNS backend patch Creation Date: 02/11/26 Post Date: 03/01/07 Hardware Platforms - OS Releases: s700: 11.11 s800: 11.11 Products: N/A Filesets:

On 04/27/16 14:19, John R Pierce wrote: > >>>> >>last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> > >>> >The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell .... >>> > >>> > >> Which one? All the BSDs I know of use the Almquist Shell except for

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2017-011 Product Asterisk Summary Memory leak in pjsip session resource Nature of Advisory Memory leak Susceptibility Remote Sessions Severity Minor

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2015-001 Product Asterisk Summary File descriptor leak when incompatible codecs are offered Nature of Advisory Resource exhaustion Susceptibility Remote