similar to: Dovecot's deliver trouble (...probably bug?)

Trying to use the deliver utility and getting this error: error: net_connect(/var/run/dovecot/auth-master) failed: No such file or directory -- Marc Perkel - marc at perkel.com Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com

Keywords: dovecot, dict, quota, postgre sql, broken pipe, remote disconnected Having Dovecot 2.2.22 (fe789d2) with Postgre SQL 9.5 (9.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04) as the backend. I do not understand why quota service is not working, not seeing it as a configuration error at least. My quotas are DICT/SQL based. OS: Ubuntu 16.0.4.1 32-bit (Linux XXX 4.4.0-59-generic #80-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 6 17:36:54

I see. Thanks for clarifying. I'm Ok with merging these if Dean agrees, as I believe he's the code owner. Thanks, Hans On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > There were no LLVM tests for presence of XRay instrumentation map in the > emitted assembly. You can see that https://reviews.llvm.org/D28624 adds this > check to the

I'm wondering why the lit tests didn't catch this as part of testing rc1 on ARM. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > XRay is tested automatically on build-bots with tests in LLVM and > compiler-rt . Or are you asking for manual testing instructions? > Of these 2 patches, the compiler-rt patch depends on LLVM patch because

How is XRay tested? IIRC, Renato didn't see any test failures on ARM? Merging sounds reasonbaly, I'd just like to understand what's the risk for the branch. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > Hans, these changes reached trunk in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL292516 and > https://reviews.llvm.org/rL292517 . Could you look?

Sorry, I initially included LLVM-Commits rather than LLVM-Dev. Fixed. On 26 January 2017 at 03:26, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dean, Renato, > > AFAIK, unfortunately, these critical Arm32 XRay fixes are not yet in 4.0: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D28624 , https://reviews.llvm.org/D28623 . The > first repairs XRay instrumentation map emission.

Hi, I successfully configured dovecot using virtual users (and LDAP/AD). deliver is the LDA and verifies if the user exists (as recommended in the WIKI). However, the howtos in the Wiki say *nothing* about the case that the recipients should be verified *before* receiving the messages (prevent backscatter, ...). All configurations in the dovecot-Wiki (postfix and exim) just accept the mails

Hi Dean, Do you have any estimates on when https://reviews.llvm.org/D21982 will reach mainline? (As I understood it's not yet there, looking at http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk ). I would like to test ARM port of XRay, so ready logging would be handful. Thanks, Serge On 8 August 2016 at 17:41, Dean Michael Berris <dean.berris at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 8

Hello, I tried lunch something but the anwer was "can't find apps" (I used absolute path too) [serge@rex wineserver-rex]$ wine /windows/ProgramFiles/Office/winword.exe Invoking /opt/wine/bin/wine.bin /windows/ProgramFiles/Office/winword.exe ... Wine failed with return code 2 /usr/bin/wine: line 516: 1046 Compl?t? tail -f $log_name Deleting /tmp/wine.log.Vv4t6C

Hi all! I have a little question concerning quadprog. To make it simple I'll start by stating the problem: I want to minimize h(d,delta)=0.5d^T B d +nabla(f(x))^T d +rho*delta^2 With respect to d\in R^n and delta \in R. I obviously have constraints (depending on both d and delta). Solve.QP does give me a good result for d but I cannot obtain anything for delta. Simce dim(Dmat)=n and

Hi there, I run a system that has a lot of virtual users. We invoke deliver from exim and pass the directory to deliver into using the HOME environment variable, so deliver doesn't do any database lookups during the delivery process. The exim pipe environment is described at http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/index.html#toc0239, but basically I'd like to know the domain

Sharing with the mailing list... Please, see below. On 9 January 2017 at 23:45, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dean, > > I have seen that you removed the following code from ARMAsmPrinter.cpp in > revision 290858: > // Emit the XRay table for this function. > EmitXRayTable(); > > Was this done by mistake or on purpose? > > Without

Hi Dean, I have a question for 32-bit platforms. I see in the code that you used the following in compiler-rt/trunk/lib/xray/xray_interface_internal.h : struct XRaySledEntry { uint64_t Address; uint64_t Function; unsigned char Kind; unsigned char AlwaysInstrument; unsigned char Padding[14]; // Need 32 bytes }; And the peer code in llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp : void

Hi Renato, As far as I understand, such issues should be caught by the tests in compiler-rt/test/xray/TestCases/Linux. I found the following lines in compiler-rt/test/xray/lit.cfg that seem to disable the tests for non-64-bit targets: if config.host_os not in ['Linux'] or config.host_arch.find('64') == -1: config.unsupported = True @Serge: You will need to change this

Hello all, I am looking for a solution where people can use Asterisk as an answering machine where with a password they can post voice message to a server in mp3 format. It's for journalists that they are far from the office ''like correspondents'' can put their job for the final diffusion server. Do you think Asterisk can do this job (I think yes, but not sure)

For some reasons the afs tokenforwarding stuff has changed siginificantly from v 2.9p2 to 2.9.9p2. This makes it impossible to use public key authenticication in a standart AFS environment. I don't know the reasons for these changes. In any case attached is a patch which restores the old behaviour. Regards Serge -- Serge Droz Paul Scherrer Institut mailto:serge.droz at

On 26 January 2017 at 20:04, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for considering. > Dean, Renato - what do you think? Hi, sorry it took so long. Yes, those two patches are fundamental to make XRay work on ARM. Backporting makes sense. We already added XRay on both ARM and AArch64 release notes, so they have to work. :) --renato

Hi Renato, Thank you very much for the directions, I am going to recommit my fix. What are hardware used in buildbots? Are these common boards like PandaBoard or some thing special? What is RAM installed? Thanks, --Serge 2014-12-11 2:36 GMT+06:00 Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>: > On 10 December 2014 at 19:06, Serge Pavlov <sepavloff at gmail.com> wrote: > > In

Hi there, I have a major problem (major for me that is) with solve.QP and I'm new at this. You see, to solve my quadratic program I need to have the lagrange multipliers after each iteration. Solve.QP gives me the solution, the unconstrained solution aswell as the optimal value. Does anybody have an idea for how I could extract the multipliers? Thanx, Serge "Beatus qui prodest quibus

I guess Dovecot has an LDA called deliver. What is it and how do I use it? Or is it ready to be used. can't find any docs on it. -- Marc Perkel - marc at perkel.com Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com