similar to: Dovecot 1.0-rc15 on Solaris 10

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Dovecot 1.0-rc15 on Solaris 10"

2007 Jan 05
2
Dovecot rc15 crash in mbox-sync-update.c
Here is another crash we've been seeing recently in rc15 on Solaris 10. (gdb) bt full #0 0xff1c12a4 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #1 0xff140040 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #2 0x000786a8 in t_buffer_alloc (size=688976) at data-stack.c:346 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "file %s: line %" #3 0x00078190 in t_pop () at data-stack.c:149 frame_block = (struct
2007 Mar 27
3
odd behavior with Dovecot LDA
Okay, to convince myself that quota handling was working okay with Dovecot 1.0-rc27 on Solaris 10, I tested sending a message to an account that was purposely over-quota. The account in question had a vacation message set up. For the first test, there was no $HOME/.imap directory at all. I received the vacation message, but the message which was supposed to be delivered locally queued in Postfix
2006 Oct 17
4
Problem with rc10
I just upgraded our test server from rc6 to rc10... ISSUE #1 I noticed that we no longer are getting two "From_" lines. However, the one that was good (had the original sender e-mail address) is now gone. The one with "dovecot.deliver" remains. I attempted to add "-d test" to the mailbox_command line in main.cf as follows: mailbox_command =
2007 Jan 05
1
Crash in rc15
We just experienced another crash in rc15. Here is the full backtrace: (gdb) bt full #0 0xff1c12a4 in .L423 () from /lib/libc.so.1 No symbol table info available. #1 0xff15fe20 in __wcsxfrm_std () from /lib/libc.so.1 No symbol table info available. #2 0xff140040 in getutline () from /lib/libc.so.1 No symbol table info available. #3 0x000786a8 in i_internal_panic_handler ( fmt=0x9ae80
2007 Jan 10
1
[sfs: dovecot-auth file descriptor usage]
I am re-posting this message from last Friday, as I have seen no replies. It is critical that we address this problem, since until then we cannot put more than a few hundred users on our server. If Dovecot-auth TRULY needs to keep open a file descriptor for every single login session, we will have to start looking at alternatives. In short: Help! ----- Forwarded message from Steven F Siirila
2007 Feb 21
4
Solaris/SSLonly/Lots of Users
Anyone running Dovecot on Solaris, requiring only SSL connections, and servicing thousands of simultaneous users? Our past attempts to do so have failed due to dovecot-auth using up all 256 of its file descriptors. I say 256 since we are limited to that by the 32-bit libraries. We are looking at either compiling Dovecot in 64-bit and letting dovecot-auth file descriptors accumulate (not ideal),
2006 Oct 26
2
www.dovecot.org misconfigured?
I am having difficulting getting to www.dovecot.org and wiki.dovecot.org. My browser tells me it can't find them. Anyone know what's up? -- Steven F. Siirila Office: Lind Hall, Room 130B Internet Services E-mail: sfs at umn.edu Office of Information Technology Voice: (612) 626-0244 University of Minnesota Fax: (612) 626-7593
2007 Mar 21
1
mail looping
We are running Postfix 2.3.3 and Dovecot 1.0-RC27 on a Solaris 10 server. We use the Dovecot LDA for local delivery. Problems arise with looping mail whenever a user's .forward contains a reference to themselves. This most frequently occurs when a user sets up a vacation since it then puts this in their .forward file: \username, "|/usr/bin/vacation username" The vacation program
2007 Mar 19
2
Index files in .imap directory
A few RC releases ago we had a problem where a user's restored home directory contained a .imap folder either from a previous RC release or perhaps it was a different server. In any event, restoration of the user caused problems since Dovecot choked on the restored .imap index files. Removing those index files cleared the problem. I'm wondering if this is still an issue, and therefore
2006 Oct 09
2
Dovecot LDA
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 10:25:53PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 21:00 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote: > > I am running Dovecot 1.0-rc6 along with dovecot-sieve from 2006-10-05 CVS. > > I am calling dovecot deliver from Postfix (main.cf): > > > > mailbox_command = /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver > > > > Upon switching to dovecot
2007 Mar 28
2
assertion failed (1.0-rc27)
Under Dovecot 1.0-rc27 on Solaris 10 we noticed this error today affecting one of our users repeatedly: Mar 28 14:02:01 myhost dovecot: IMAP(myuser): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 423 (mbox_sync_read_and_move): assertion failed: (need_space == (uoff_t)-mails[idx].space) Mar 28 14:02:01 myhost dovecot: IMAP(myuser): Raw backtrace: 0x7ac54 -> 0x42cd4 -> 0x3e968 -> 0x3f54c -> 0x3f980
2007 Jan 24
1
[sfs@tc.umn.edu: Re: dovecot-auth file descriptor usage]
I hate to be a pest, but are there any revelations on file descriptor "overusage" by dovecot-auth? ----- Forwarded message from Steven F Siirila <sfs at tc.umn.edu> ----- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:42:50 -0600 From: Steven F Siirila <sfs at tc.umn.edu> To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-auth file
2007 Mar 23
2
Dovecot LDA issues
We've seen two issues come up with Dovecot LDA, both of which have caused us problems: 1) If the user's home directory does not exist, or is not owned by them, deliver fails and causes the mail message to bounce back to the originator. In our environment this happens when our user is moved to another server (where we move their files, but for up to 24 hours afterwards,
2007 Jun 13
4
Dovecot LDA munging INBOX access times?
We are running Dovecot 1.0.0 using mbox format (currently in the midst of conversion from UW IMAP). We discovered today that the Dovecot LDA is accessing the user's INBOX at delivery time! Not only do our users rely on this access time being when they last accessed their e-mail, we also rely on it to migrate "inactive" users to cheaper disk. I consider this a major bug for us and
2006 Nov 20
4
Dovecot on Solaris
For those running Dovecot on Solaris, what are your positive/negative experiences with building the software with CC vs. GCC? We are currently letting ./configure find our gcc and build with it, but wondered if anyone has any experience with Sun CC (does it even compile, for example). -- Steven F. Siirila Office: Lind Hall, Room 130B Internet Services E-mail: sfs at umn.edu Office of
2007 Jan 31
1
Startup errors
I just finished setting up a test Dovecot server (1.0-rc15, Solaris 10) and noticed upon start of Dovecot (after rebooting the server) that the imap-login and pop3-login processes spew errors as follows, which I can only assume is due to the fact that dovecot-auth has not fully initialized yet... it seems to me that these login processes are getting started too early, or should at least be
2007 Jan 05
1
Dovecot LDA failure in RC16
After upgrading a test server from rc15 to rc16, Postfix was no longer able to deliver mail via Dovecot deliver: Jan 5 11:00:59 testhost postfix/local[8873]: 497282EFE: to=<testuser at testhost>, relay=local, delay=1.2, delays=0.13/0.02/0/1, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command died with status 89: "/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f "$SENDER"") Should "status
2007 Jan 03
1
file descriptor leak?
We are having problems with the latest Dovecot 1.0 (RC15) regarding file descriptors > 255 being handed off to fdopen() via crypt() via PAM(?). This is a problem on Solaris 10 due to the fact that the stdio library does not support file descriptors > 255 (in order to remain binary-compatibile with older binaries). Here are the messages we run into if we get too many (~250?) concurrent
2007 Jan 05
2
dovecot-auth file descriptor usage
In dovecot-auth (rc15) we experienced problems when the file descriptors reached 256 (due to a Solaris fdopen() call described previously). The issue was that there was one file descriptor being used for every imap-login and pop3-login process (in our environment of SSL-only that means one for every active IMAP and POP connection). Mods were made (and appear in rc16) to close out the descriptor
2006 Nov 23
2
small mbox and index files problem
Dovecot version: 1.0-0_33.rc15 built by atrpms Operating system: Redhat EL4 CPU architecture: x86 Filesystem you used: mailboxs via nfs to fileserver using xfs Just upgraded from 1.0-0_20.rc7 to 1.0-0_33.rc15 built by atrpms and we had previously set mbox_min_index_size to 1024 (1Mb) and now all mailboxes (mbox format) that are under this size are not able to be opened and throw an "Internal