similar to: Still issues with new message count...

I have a few clients that have more than one user in the same mailbox. I have my setup using fctrl for mailbox and index locking. My mail is stored on a network file system (gluster) and my indexes are stored on the local drive. I have a few issues: - My users mailboxes have issues where messages will be mixed up (you go to open a message and it gets a different message) - messages will

Patrick Lists wrote: >>> I fail to see how your repository problem is related to my Kickstart PXE/NFS >>> problem. We can install CentOS 6 (no Kickstart) without problems using PXE. >>> It's the NFS-mounting of the Kickstart-file which fails. What I'd love to learn >>> is how others have made NFS/Kickstart work... >> >> Is CentOS 6 assuming

just a quick update: no issues with NFSv4.0 (load is slowly growing, currently ~7k mailboxes) instead, bad news from delegation front, we enabled it for a couple of days but we ran in ugly issues: processes went in "uninterruptible sleep" state, load average gets huge, reboot was the only escape :-( -brd Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Il 12/06/2015 13:02, brd ha scritto: > >Alessio

Alessio Cecchi wrote: [...] > Have you already try to run NFSv4? it's in place on a (very) small sample of mailboxes in dbox format, no issues up to now (Debian Wheezy mainline kernel) > When we switch to netapp and nfsv4 we had many problems (lock problems > and instability) and we had to go immediately to NFSv3. I don't know if > was a netapp problem or nfs client (Debian

hi all, i'm managing a large installation of a dovecot cluster in director + NFS backend architecture and we are moving from NFSv3 to NFSv4. Our NFS server is a Netapp in clustered mode and reading technical specs of NFSv4 delegation feature it seems that enabling delegation in this type of dovecot architecture should bring great benefits: only one backend server access a specific mailbox at a

We recently had a strange NFS performance anomaly between a V880 running snv_124 and two NetApp filers. To investigate, a DTrace NFSv4 (and eventually NFSv3) client provider would been extremely helpful. Unfortunately, all I could find were a request for code review of a v3 client provider and another request for help developing a v4 provider. Nothing seems to have come from those initiatives,

Hi, We are running into a problem with a Samba setup and would like to know if a current fix or workaround is at all possible. Our setup is a NetApp filer serving NFS v4 that is mounted by Solaris and Linux servers. On those servers we are using Samba to create shares of those NFSv4 mounted filesystems. We are migrating to this NFSv4 setup from an existing Solaris NFSv3+Posix ACL setup that also

Hello, I set up NFSv4 server. To make sure I set vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4. I can check its version, for example, by tcpduming and then I can see in wireshark lines like: Network File System Program Version: 4 V4 Procedure: COMPOUND.... .... is there any easier way to check its version? I see there is nfsstat -e option which shows delegs and locks. But all other ones are combined with nfsv3

I know this was discussed a lot a few years ago, but my google searches aren't quite getting me where I'm confident in the answer, so I figure I'd just ask again here if that's ok. Here's what we have, and what we'd like to do: Storage is a Netapp (cluster mode CDOT 8.2 I believe), it's NFS exported to our linux system. Linux system is CentOS 6 and can NFS mount the

Hi, Just out of curiosity what is in nfsv4 delegation that you think would give a benefit on your configuration? If I read back the thread you seem to have dovecot configured with director ring in front of the backends. In that case Dovecot already manages storage in a way that only one of the backends is accessing each users data at a time. So I can?t see anything but problems form enabling

I was used to integrate some linux client in my samba network mounting homes with 'unix extensions = yes', and works as expected, at least with some old lubuntu derivatives. Client side i use 'pam_mount'. Now i'm working on a ubuntu mate derivative, and i've not found a way to start the session properly in CIFS. If i create a plain local home (pam_mkhome), session start as

I have a situation where I need to share, via Samba, a filesystem mounted via NFSv4. I'm struggling with the best way to make Samba see the NFSv4 ACLs and enumerate them to provide the proper SMB/CIFS access to the files, instead of "Access Denied" errors that I currently get. Looking at the Samba source, the only obvious NFSv4 stuff appears to be the following: - zfsacl, available

> On Dec 3, 2015, at 17:24, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:54:21PM -0700, Nick Couchman wrote: >> I have a situation where I need to share, via Samba, a filesystem mounted via NFSv4. I'm struggling with the best way to make Samba see the NFSv4 ACLs and enumerate them to provide the proper SMB/CIFS access to the files, instead

Hi everybody and thanks to those persons who make klibc being possible. I am booting a lessdisks system from a server. I have got it in NFSv3 but I would like use the features of NFSv4. I am using initramfs-tools so I have in my initrd.img the utility nfsmount wich make possible booting in NFSv3. I would like know if exists some version of nfsmount or some patch or, if does not, some program (a

Hi, What is the magic juju that I have to put in /etc/sysconfig/autofs to get autofs to default to using NFSv4, rather than NFSv3, for mounting file systems? I don't want to place these flags into the automount maps themselves because we have a varied network with Sun, CentOS, RedHat and Macintosh systems, and the flags that have to get added to automount maps (which we distribute centrally

I want to list/use the nfs probes but I get the error "dtrace: failed to match nfs*:::: No probe matches description". Is there a way to enable nfs provider probes? My system is running snv_112 (bfu''ed from the gate archive) # dtrace -lP nfs* ID PROVIDER MODULE FUNCTION NAME dtrace: failed to match nfs*:::: No probe matches

Thank you for that, i did have a good look at that one. And i use Debian 9, if you test what i posted below in the thread, you will see NFSv4 works fine. Below is missing one more thing, the "allow to delegate (kerberos only) " on the computer object in the AD, should be enabled. And yes, i've see bugchecks also but only on my debian .. Lenny.. Stt.. ;-) .. Its my last lenny

When somebody is hammering on the system, I want to be able to detect who''s doing it, and hopefully even what they''re doing. I can''t seem to find any way to do that. Any suggestions? Everything I can find ... iostat, nfsstat, etc ... AFAIK, just show me performance statistics and so forth. I''m looking for something more granular. Either *who* the

Hello all, I have an NFS Server where I want give access to a specific address to a specific path. Problem is that I have some other shares active which I do not want the specific IP to not access it. The /etc/exports looks like the following: /nfs/Share1??? ??? ???? 10.10.*(rw) /nfs/Share2?? ? ??????? 10.10.*(rw) /kdnbckp/CS21?????????? 10.10.193.43(rw) The client on the last line (IP

Some miscellaneous questions: * When you share a ZFS fs via NFS, what happens to files and filesystems that exceed the limits of NFS? * Is there a recommendation or some guidelines to help answer the question "how full should a pool be before deciding it''s time add disk space to a pool?" * Migrating pre-ZFS backups to ZFS backups: is there a better method than "restore