similar to: Bug#1089621: xen: Invalid copyright years "2022-present"

Hi Adam, On 8/25/24 15:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I noticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which > claims to have been uploaded by you. > > I'm afraid that we can't accept it currently, because it is a newer > version than is currently in unstable and testing: > > xen | 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 | stable |

Hi, I noticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which claims to have been uploaded by you. I'm afraid that we can't accept it currently, because it is a newer version than is currently in unstable and testing: xen | 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 | stable | source xen | 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 | stable-debug | source xen

FYI: The status of the xen source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1 Current version: 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See

Source: xen Severity: normal User: debian-lts at lists.debian.org Usertags: upstream-trixie X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-lts at lists.debian.org Dear xen maintainers, Testing (trixie) currently ships xen 4.17, which, according to the upstream support matrix [x], will get security support until 2025-12-12. The latest upstream release (4.19) will get security support until 2027-07-29. I believe it would

Source: xen Version: 4.17.0+46-gaaf74a532c-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: carnil at debian.org, Debian Security Team <team at security.debian.org> Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for xen. CVE-2022-42331[0]: | x86: speculative vulnerability in 32bit SYSCALL path Due to an | oversight in the very original Spectre/Meltdown security work | (XSA-254),

Source: xen Version: 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-ocaml-maint at lists.debian.org Usertags: ocaml-5.2.0-transition Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 for the following reason: Problem in C stubs A full log is available at: http://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-5.2.0/pool/xen.log A repository with all relevant packages

Source: xen Version: 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1 Severity: important User: debian-python at lists.debian.org Usertags: dh-python-no-setuptools Tags: sid, trixie This package failed build from source when test-built against a version of dh-python without a python3-setuptools dependency. distutils is no longer part of the Python standard library, since 3.12. But a minimal version of it becomes

Source: xen Version: 4.17.0-1 Severity: important Tags: security upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: carnil at debian.org, Debian Security Team <team at security.debian.org> Hi, The following vulnerability was published for xen. CVE-2022-42330[0]: | Guests can cause Xenstore crash via soft reset When a guest issues a | "Soft Reset" (e.g. for performing a kexec) the libxl based Xen |

Source: xen Version: 4.17.0+24-g2f8851c37f-2 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: carnil at debian.org, Debian Security Team <team at security.debian.org> Hi, The following vulnerability was published for xen, filling with RC severity (for ideally fixed before bookworm release): CVE-2022-27672[0]: | When SMT is enabled, certain AMD processors may speculatively execute |

Source: xen Version: 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramacher at debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=xen&arch=armhf&ver=4.17.3%2B10-g091466ba55-1.1&stamp=1709892742&raw=0 xenstored_control.c:646:70: error: format ?%ld? expects argument of

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:20:02 +0400 Mariam Arutunian <mariamarutunian at gmail.com> wrote: > Package: libxen > Version: 4.17.3 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: mariamarutunian at gmail.com > > Dear Maintainer, > A vulnerability identified as CVE-2014-4608 was discovered and fixed in LZO decompressor in the Linux kernel with the following commit:

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 681293 711923 Bug #681293 [apt-listchanges] apt-listchanges should try to get the changelog from control.tar first Unable to merge bugs because: package of #711923 is 'xen-utils-common' not 'apt-listchanges' Failed to forcibly merge 681293: Did not alter merged bugs

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 711273 711923 Bug #711273 [xen-hypervisor-4.2-amd64] xen-hypervisor-4.2-amd64: Acn't re-create domains after migration from 4.1 to 4.2 Unable to merge bugs because: package of #711923 is 'xen-utils-common' not 'xen-hypervisor-4.2-amd64' Failed to forcibly merge 711273: Did not alter merged bugs

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > merge 691734 709103 Bug #691734 [xen-utils-common] xen-utils-common should install successfully even if xen cannot be started Unable to merge bugs because: severity of #709103 is 'normal' not 'important' Failed to merge 691734: Did not alter merged bugs Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript',

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 711923 711273 Bug #711923 [xen-utils-common] xen-utils-common: After run 'xm create ...' i got error "Error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind' Unable to merge bugs because: package of #711273 is 'xen-hypervisor-4.2-amd64' not 'xen-utils-common' Failed to forcibly merge 711923:

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > merge 757724 751894 Bug #757724 [src:xen] Multiple security issues Unable to merge bugs because: package of #751894 is 'xen' not 'src:xen' Failed to merge 757724: Did not alter merged bugs Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x34d0490)', 'requester', 'Ian Campbell <ijc at

Doesn't it mean you have to remember changing copyright in 2019? -- Mykola Ivanets ср, 22 серп. 2018, 08:58 користувач Bernhard M. Wiedemann < bwiedemann@suse.de> пише: > This change helps to make libguestfs package build reproducible. > See https://reproducible-builds.org/ for why this is good. > > Without this patch, building today's libguestfs in 2033, claims >

Thanks for explanation. -- Mykola Ivanets ср, 22 серп. 2018, 22:23 користувач Bernhard M. Wiedemann < bwiedemann@suse.de> пише: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2018-08-22 06:11, Nikolay Ivanets wrote: > > Doesn't it mean you have to remember changing copyright in 2019? > > s/have to/can/ > > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2018-08-22 06:11, Nikolay Ivanets wrote: > Doesn't it mean you have to remember changing copyright in 2019? s/have to/can/ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2390230/do-copyright-dates-need-to-be-updated In many jurisdictions, expiry of copyright is 50-70 years after death of the author and that point in time does not depend on when a

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 570066 596765 Bug #570066 [xen-utils-common] xen-utils-4.1: should depend on python-lxml Bug #593741 [xen-utils-common] xen-utils-4.1: should depend on python-lxml Bug #641934 [xen-utils-common] xen-utils-common: missing python-lxml dependancy Unable to merge bugs because: package of #596765 is 'xen' not