similar to: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file

Dear list, I hope this is not an old issue, but I couldn't find a solution even after google'ing quite some time. I try to migrate our institute's mail server (~200 users) from an old cyrus-based Mac installation to a new machine (NetBSD, dovecot 2.0.13). Everything went quite smoothly so far, but we are used to have "shared folders" ("public" folders in dovecot)

Hi, When I try to open the attached mbox file I get the following warning in Thunderbird 1.5.0.10: 'The current command failed. The e-mail server responded: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file'. I also tried this with squirrelmail, with the same result. The Dovecot version is dovecot-1.0.rc28, compiled from source. The attached mbox was correctly read from, and written to in earlier

Hi, I don''t know how most of you get these messages, but I get the digest version. It seems that most people, when replying to a message, include all the previous messages in their reply. This means that when I read the digest version, I need to scroll through several pages of old emails to find the new ones. It doesn''t make sense (to me) to be resend these old messages over and

RSpec-ers: I''m aware this is quite the FAQ. I have probably asked it myself, but I just can''t Google up anything but others asking it. I grabbed the source to Beast, to use as a Rails project uninfluenced by me, or RSpec. Then I installed the CURRENT version of RSpec and rspec_on_rails, and set up a model spec on Post. Here''s the spec_helper.rb lines:

Dear friends, I cannot load the pachkages labdsv...which i do not understand is linked to 'mgcv' package. Anyway neither the last is loadable in my new R 2.10 version. Th emessage on the screen is the following: This is mgcv 1.6-1. For overview type `help("mgcv-package")'. Error in runif(1) : .Random.seed is not an integer vector but of type 'list' Error :

I was wondering if it would make sense to change the default behavior of the following: summary(15555L) ## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. ## 15560 15560 15560 15560 15560 15560 summary.default on numeric values rounds values (not just presentation) to getOption("digits")-3L (or four) digits by default, making those values surprising and less suitable for

God help me I know I said let it die, but it was continued elsewhere also. I'll try to keep this forest fire in ONE location. On 6/7/07, Frank Tanner III <pctech at mybellybutton.com> wrote: Okay, lets try to contain this to ONE forum (mailing list) please. > See... Your whole response to my whole firewall document thing is EXACTLY why I didn't post it on your wiki. Because

No :) I'm trying to start by having something that keeps people from breaking the build and tests (by letting them submit patches and being whiny 3 minutes after something breaks). Once that is done, we can move to something that keeps all the languages in good shape. I think if i simply made it do everything at once, people would just ignore it. At least, that's my experience :)

> Oh is Gecko == Mozilla? Oh well, can''t keep them straight. As far as I''m > concerned there are only 2 browsers worth developing for, IE6 and FF > > 1.07. Remove IE 6 and I agree, hahahaha. Actually, I hate Mozilla''s box model (I know it''s the w3c recommended one, but it''s flawed. Width and height should include padding and borders.

Im using a customs processor to run ffmpeg on a video to create a thumbnail. So far so good. Except when I do: cmd = "-i #{@file.path} -f flv -s 320x240 ~/Downloads/foobar/q.flv" success = Paperclip.run(''ffmpeg'', cmd) Console is reporting: ffmpeg ''-i /var/folders/uL/uL0bYOOZEZaJH5E+BmDJVE+++TI/-Tmp-/stream, 16824,1.mpeg -f flv -s 320x240

Hello all, I have successfully migrated from pop3d to dovecot. Now, I am having users call in unable to pop (prompted with a user/pass login). OE shows this in the error box: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file. I am able to log into the box using Webmail. Any suggestions? Cliff

Hello, I have upgraded my dovecot-0.99.13-3.FC3 to dovecot-1.0-0.beta8.2.fc5 recently and now am having weird problem. If somebody's mailbox has the first line in a form of From "User Name" <user at host.domain.edu> Thu Oct 7 14:20:00 1999 instead of From user at host.domain.edu Thu Oct 7 14:20:00 1999 then that mailbox couldn't be precessed by dovecot. It

> ERROR: > ERROR: Could not complete request. > Query: SELECT "Mailbox" > Reason Given: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file removing the () from the first line of the mbox fixed it. The line: From luser at hotmail.com () Mon Jun 25 11:20:33 2007 Is this a valid line? -- Ken Anderson Pacific.Net

Getting "Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file" on 1.2rc2 after transferring mail from an ancient 0.99.13 system. The first line of the file looks ok. Curiously, it's one of my archival folders of this list. Here's the first header from the top of the file: >From tss at iki.fi Sat May 1 21:48:17 2004 From: tss at iki.fi (Timo Sirainen) Date: Sat May 1 21:54:18 2004

Hello all, I have a new installation of Fedora 4 and Dovecot 1.4.Alpha4 A small percentage of my users are getting unable to pop mail from a client (ie: Outlook), they get continually prompted for username/password. The error they get is: Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file. When I look in the file, I don't see anything unusual. There's not much info on the Internet about this

I have an Athlon/64, 1 GB RAM, 80 GB IDE system and I'm intending to use it for combination workstation/Dev server duties. I've gotten a consistent failure when I try to groupinstall KDE. After grinding through all the deps, it comes up with the below: Install 228 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 331 M Is this ok [y/N]: y

I have an Athlon/64, 1 GB RAM, 80 GB IDE system and I'm intending to use it for combination workstation/Dev server duties. I've gotten a consistent failure when I try to groupinstall KDE. After grinding through all the deps, it comes up with the below: Install 228 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 331 M Is this ok [y/N]: y

I''m using WhinyProtectedAttributes: http://henrik.nyh.se/2007/10/whiny-protected-attributes Say I have this model: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base attribute_accessible :name end If I then create a Person with an invalid attribute, an exception is raised. For example: Person.new :name => ''Bob'', :asdf => ''asdf'' What I''d like to

About two weeks ago i was whining about an inode that got lost, now i'm going to whine more about strange things happening here. A matroxfb just oopsed on me (thats not strange), the machine got unusuable, so i logged in from another and got the idea to touch /forcefsck. Upon reboot, fsck said that some inodes are in use but have dtime set and that some files are illegal sockets. Now this

John, I had raised the matter ten years ago, and I was told that the topic was already very^3 old https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-September/042684.html there is some discussion on its origin and also a declaration of intents to change the default behaviour, which, unfortunately, remained a declaration. I agree that R could do better here, let's hope in less than ten years