similar to: Multiple delivery with LDA+sieve

❦ 4 avril 2018 15:59 +0200, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> : >> I may have missed this suggestion. Maybe Dan only sent it to you? > > No, there is another thread where this issue is discussed: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-April/msg00190.html > > In the >> meantime, could I change the locks around virHashForEach() and similar

❦ 4 avril 2018 17:00 +0200, Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx> : >>> You can do that locally, but as a patch it's very unlikely to be >>> accepted upstream because we've introduced RW locks to be able to access >>> domain list from multiple threads. >> >> Looking a bit more, the whole "iterating" bit is currently >> unsafe.

❦ 5 avril 2018 17:00 +0200, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> : >> 0001-util-don-t-check-for-parallel-iteration-in-hash-rela.patch >> >> >> From 7bf32825325b124edce58687a8cd2ceff13328b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Vincent Bernat <vincent@bernat.im> >> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:25:37 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] util: don't check

❦ 25 juillet 2016 08:44 CEST, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> : >>> "Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want no network. Where >>> should the vnet be connected? >> >>The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an >>interface of type "ethernet" instead of "network" to get the effect

Hey! I am trying to figure out how to reliably maintain a connection to libvirtd. From the documentation, I would expect something like that: - virConnectOpen() - virConnectRegisterCloseCallback() - virConnectSetKeepAlive() - Application logic And in the registered callback, I would: - virConnectUnregisterCloseCallback() - virConnectClose() - virConnectOpen() -

❦ 25 juillet 2016 06:06 CEST, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> : >>╭─────┤ http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementsConnect ├───── >>│Inclusion of the forward element indicates that the virtual network is >>│to be connected to the physical LAN.Since 0.3.0. The mode attribute >>│determines the method of forwarding. If there is no forward element, the

Hey! Another question. The documentation about networks say: ╭─────┤ http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementsConnect ├───── │Inclusion of the forward element indicates that the virtual network is │to be connected to the physical LAN.Since 0.3.0. The mode attribute │determines the method of forwarding. If there is no forward element, the │network will be isolated from any other network

Hello, I am using dovecot 1.2.9, and the sieve plugin for filtering incoming messages into specific folders. The MTA is postfix, and deliver is called using the "mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver" directive. Is it possible to make dovecot's deliver discard duplicate messages? With cyrus there is a duplicatesuppression directive which works well

I'm trying to use procmail and I'm having trouble getting it to set some headers. I have one mailing list that sets ?Newsgroups: in the header and I want to remove it. I have the following test recipe: :0 * ^Subject:.*\<testing * ^(Mime-Version:|Content-) | formail -IMime-Version: -IContent- If I understand it correctly, it should remove the Mime-Verion and Content headers. The

On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:18:19PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: >Hey! > >Another question. The documentation about networks say: > >╭─────┤ http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementsConnect ├───── >│Inclusion of the forward element indicates that the virtual network is >│to be connected to the physical LAN.Since 0.3.0. The mode attribute >│determines the method of

On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:13:08PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: >Hey! > >I am trying to figure out how to reliably maintain a connection to >libvirtd. From the documentation, I would expect something like that: > > - virConnectOpen() > - virConnectRegisterCloseCallback() > - virConnectSetKeepAlive() > - Application logic > >And in the registered callback, I would:

Hey! It seems that if I close a connection while a domain event callback is in progress, I can easily have a crash. Here is a backtrace: #v+ #0 virFree (ptrptr=0x0) at ../../../src/util/viralloc.c:582 save_errno = <optimized out> #1 0x00007fc8328a4ad2 in virObjectEventCallbackListPurgeMarked (cbList=0xadfc30) at ../../../src/conf/object_event.c:282 freecb = <optimized

Hi! In the process of making mysystem work again, having just done a reinstall of 6.3 x86_64. I have a considerable collection of procmail recipes for filtering mail in various ways, and since the upgrade none of 'em is working. procmail passes every mail thru spambayes, which gives back a rating on spamminess. this happens, so it's not as if procmail is simply punting. that is

Hello List, i switched mailformat from mbox to maildir. Now i have a little problem with procmail/formail and headermanipulation of mails. Here an example: 0 * ^From.*gmx.de | (formail -t -I"procmail: gmx.de") >> /var/spool/mail/xxxxxx So, i can add some different headerlines for later evaluation and the result is attached to inbox. Now i have the problem that i don't know

hi all I am trying to filter emails to a user (weather) based on the subject: :0 *^Subject:.*Weather | /usr/bin/formail | /path/to/executable *^Subject:.*Tornado | /usr/bin/formail | /path/to/executable All it does is deliver the email to the weather inbox. For testing I tried. echo 1 | mail -s "Tornado" weather Enabling verbose and log file gives me: From root at

Using Dovecot 2.2.13 with Tika 1.5 on Centos 5 64bit Tika is throwing an exception for some reason, which seems to be causing Dovecot's indexer to segfault. I'm using mdbox/gzipped compressed mail and private indexes for the shared folder. I'm importing mail via formail/dovecot-lda: formail -s /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d admin -m Public/TestSubFolder? < /tmp/Inbox.mbox

Dear all, i have a mail server & vpopmail. Now, i want to copy from each message to a directory.i find a way to do it. i put following line in .qmail-default : |formail -X "" > ~/text.txt Of course above line is test.Given line doesn't retrieves Return* header field. My question: How i retrieve entire email same itslef? Yours, Mohsen

Hello, still trying to move from procmail to sieve, but there are new problems. Currently we use procmail for autoresponder and let user choose timerange, in which responder should work. May be you set up today your responder for 2 weeks in future where responder start and stop automatically without further manuell intervention. In procmail this is done by simple scripting and comparison of

Some threads just go on too long. Personally I think a troll has hijacked the main centos list again and is inducing food fight behaviours while that troll perfectly 'innocently' asserting that it is just respoding to all email. see: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645 for a discussion of the problem of 'capture' in FOSS projects. But if one loses

Is it possible to have a sieve script reply with a press message to certain emails (and only certain emails) based on sieve matches? I see a lot on vacation replies, but I want something more specific. Something along the lines of procmails formail command? Everything I?ve searched for is about vacation r filing replies into the same folder as the original message.