similar to: DNS update fails after samba domain controller is restarted

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "DNS update fails after samba domain controller is restarted"

2014 Mar 18
0
help with DNS issues with dynamic updates
Hi guys am needing some help, am using bind to provide the DNS backend for samba using dlz resolution works well however!! my clients are not able to update the registered DNS entries when running samba_dnsupdate against the samba DLZ named server am getting ; Communication with 127.0.0.1#53 failed: timed out could not talk to any default name server Failed nsupdate: 1 Then bind stops
2019 Feb 28
0
status on samba trusts
Hai Maurik-Jan, Stefan's work can be found here, i'm reading it myself and its really good.
2019 Mar 05
0
status on samba trusts
Hi Stefan, others, Just to report back that things work very nicely now that DNS is using one dns proxy that resolves both AD domains. I am testing now with a 'full' two-way trust, and everyhing seemed to work, including the tests from samba-tool and from windows "domains and trusts" perspective. From an administrative point of view, the fact that your have to add
2019 Feb 28
2
status on samba trusts
Thanks everybody! The sudden burst of help (both on- and offlist) is much appreciated. :-) I'll get back to my test setup next week, and try again with these new insights. MJ On 2/28/19 3:46 PM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai Maurik-Jan, > > Stefan's work can be found here, i'm reading it myself and its really good. > >
2015 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Question about NoWrap flag for SCEVAddRecExpr
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 12:48 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Base is treated as unsigned so
2015 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Question about NoWrap flag for SCEVAddRecExpr
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > >> Base is treated as unsigned so 0xff…ff + 1 would be 0x100…00 > > This is the part I was missing, thanks for pointing out the FAQ. So > the infinitely precise address computed by a GEP is > > zext(Base) + sext(Idx0) + sext(Idx1) … ? Yes, that is the way I read it.
2018 Jun 01
0
DNS not resolving particular host from queries from particular subnet
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:12:43 +0100 Zdravko Zdravkov <nirayah at gmail.com> wrote: > True that! Sorry > > smb.conf > > > > [global] > > netbios name = AD > > realm = XXXX.CO.UK > > server role = active directory domain controller > > server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, > >
2012 Jan 18
2
[LLVMdev] Question about isel patterns
I am looking for a way to define patterns without specifying the type of the root node in the RHS result. I want to be able to write something like this: def : Pat<(i64 imm:$in), (GenDAG imm:$in)>; (GenDAG is a custom function that returns the DAG that replaces the node in the LHS.) A little background: Mips emits a sequence of instructions to load immediate constants that do not fit in
2007 Jun 24
4
It seems the "machine check exception handling" breaks HVM guest
Hi Jan Beulich, > changeset 15414: 3cf5052ba5e5 x86: machine check exception handling With the c/s, when creating HVM guest, I can only see a white Qemu window. :( Can you have a look? Thanks. PS: the serial log follows: (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 02:0 bar 14 size 00001000: f2000000 (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 03:0 bar 10 size 00000100: 0000c101 (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 03:0 bar 14 size 01000000:
2020 May 15
3
Samba and DNS backend question
Hi Rowland, 1. Thanks for you clarification ;) 2. About, my old DLZ configuration is: Versions: bind-9.11 - S.O Centos 7.8 This was the sambadc04 with the old bind dlz backend . [..........] [root at sambadc04 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/named |grep -v '^#' NAMED_RUN_CHROOTED="no" OPTIONS="-4" [..........] The /etc/named.conf [..........] acl "trusted" {
2018 Jun 01
2
DNS not resolving particular host from queries from particular subnet
Hi Rowland. Trying the suggested named.conf broke the local resolve of the storage as well (for clients in 192.168.26.0), so I reverted back to my old one since I have computers here using the storage at the moment. Would you have any other suggestions? On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:12:43 +0100 >
2019 Jun 19
1
Can't access DNS from RSAT
Hello Rowland, Thanks for your reply. This is my named.conf options { listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.1.10; }; directory "/var/named"; dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; memstatistics-file "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt";
2000 Apr 03
0
2.0.7pre3: misc issues
My systems: rh61, 2.2.14 + smbfs-nls.patch. === 1) Samba seems to override unix permissions in a particular case. I get the very same behavior of: http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba-technical/February2000/0476.html === 2) browsing behavior: anonymous login There is a different behavior doing smbclient -L -U% if the server is samba or nt/w2k nt wants a correct user/pass pair if guest account
2020 Feb 19
1
Why are ForeignSecurityPrincipals and Managed Service Accounts empty with no entries?
Resend. ________________________________ From: Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming <ceo at teo-en-ming-corp.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 8:07 AM To: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org>; Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> Cc: Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming <ceo at teo-en-ming-corp.com> Subject: Re: [Samba] Why are ForeignSecurityPrincipals and
2020 Feb 19
0
Why are ForeignSecurityPrincipals and Managed Service Accounts empty with no entries?
Resend. ________________________________ From: Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming <ceo at teo-en-ming-corp.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 8:09 AM To: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org>; Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> Cc: Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming <ceo at teo-en-ming-corp.com> Subject: Re: [Samba] Why are ForeignSecurityPrincipals and
2010 Oct 20
3
rspec error's when checking LayoutLinks from the railstutorials
I am following the rails tutorial: http://railstutorial.org/chapters/filling-in-the-layout#top Basically the test is something like: spec/requests/layout_links_spec.rb require ''spec_helper'' describe "LayoutLinks" do it "should have a Home page at ''/''" do get ''/'' response.should
2014 Sep 21
1
rndc permission denied
Hi, h when I have the following problem with rndc: [root at centos7 ~]# rndc recursing and rndc: 'recursing' failed: permission denied SELinux is disables: named.conf config file is: // // named.conf // // Provided by Red Hat bind package to configure the ISC BIND named(8) DNS // server as a caching only nameserver (as a localhost DNS resolver only). // // See
2018 Jun 01
2
DNS not resolving particular host from queries from particular subnet
True that! Sorry smb.conf > [global] > netbios name = AD > realm = XXXX.CO.UK > server role = active directory domain controller > server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, > winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate > workgroup = XXXX > idmap config XXXX:unix_nss_info = yes >
2009 May 04
1
Syncronization in rails
Hello, Here is the logic that I am trying to achieve. I have a User Model and the business rule is that user can accept maximum 5 friends requests. for this I have an accept method in User Model which looks similar to below code snippet def accept(friend) raise ArgumentError if self.friends.count >= MAX_FRIENDS_ALLOWED ... ... #code to add friend to friends list end As you
2006 Feb 11
2
Logging Bind answers
I am having a mail server problem where the mail to one domain is being sent to the wrong server. When I use "dig masonc.com mx", I get ;; ANSWER SECTION: masonc.com. 86400 IN MX 5 mail.masonc.com. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: masonc.com. 86400 IN NS ns1.picadoo.com. masonc.com. 86400 IN NS ns2.picadoo.com. ;;