similar to: Exceptions to MyNetworks

I am having difficulting getting to www.dovecot.org and wiki.dovecot.org. My browser tells me it can't find them. Anyone know what's up? -- Steven F. Siirila Office: Lind Hall, Room 130B Internet Services E-mail: sfs at umn.edu Office of Information Technology Voice: (612) 626-0244 University of Minnesota Fax: (612) 626-7593

I'm hoping that there are some Gentoo users on this list who will chime in on a bug that is near and dear to my heart. We've created an updated Gentoo ebuild that adds a sieve USE flag and builds dovecot-sieve if the use flag is enabled. The gentoo bug is here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141743 and the ebuild is available as an attachment to that bug, or as a patch

We are currently evaluating the migration from a proprietary, legacy mail server onto Dovecot for 20,000+ virtual domains. This is a big job and we intend to do it by initially proxying connections through to the legacy server, and moving customers over in batches by turning off the proxy feature for them. In the manual it states "This model is still a bit unfinished in current code"

Hi Dovecot People, i have switched my system from courier-imap to dovecot and iam quite happy with it, the performance is well and i had nearly no problems. One little feature iam missing is in Courier i had a folder called "Outbox" there i could paste mails which i want to sent out. In some networks its not always available to sent mails via port 21, i know i could just set up my

Hi guys I'm about to embark on a project replacing a legacy single mail server running proprietary software with a cluster of Dovecot servers. We clearly need a shared mail store for these servers, but we are not happy with simply using a server running NFS as this becomes a single point of failure. What have other people used? AFAICT our options are: * A shared block device (Fibre

Is it possible to automatically authenticate Dovecot users using the same type of mechanism which makes Postfix able to simply check SMTP users using the mynetworks variable? Basically I would like to be able to authenticate users on my designated networks automatically, and require a password for those outside this network. Is this possible? -- --asai

Hi all. Sorry for posting this to the devel list but the website is unclear on this issue. We''re about to purchase Xen Enterprise and would like to run it on Debian Etch (i.e. Debian Etch for the dom0 as well as the domUs). It looks like the deliverable when Xen Enterprise is purchased is a CD image containing a Red Hat installation. Can anyone point us at a supported method of

Deliver from latest 1.1 HG with sieve also from latest 1.1 HG is dying with an assertion failure when it delivers to my mailbox. Other mailboxes on the same system are unaffected, but I can read my mailbox fine through IMAP. Dovecot and sieve were compiled with -march=nocona -pipe -ggdb I've commented out my entire sieve script and the problem still occurs. file index-mail-headers.c: line

hello all reader hello list hello centos network since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails no longer pass through amavisd. amavisd no longer work. c is to say I have no anti-spam and anti virus my postconf and dovecot -n [root at r13151 ~]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases body_checks =

I want to discuss some problems/enhancements for dovecot in a webmail/otp setup. For access to an IMAP server like dovecot I see different client types: a) a "normal" MUA installed in a more or less trusted environment b) remote access via "webmail" from untrusted environments For a) I see with dovecot and other IMAP servers no problems, tricky is the setup for b). If you use

hello all reader hello list hello dovecot network since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails no longer pass through amavisd. amavisd no longer work. c is to say I have no anti-spam and anti virus my postconf and dovecot -n [root at r13151 ~]# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases body_checks

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 Bug ID: 3544 Summary: Support CIDR notation for host pattern matching Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

Just a trivial question... Do the hosts allow and hosts deny clauses (i.e. within smb.conf) support the use of IPv4 CIDR notation (e.g. A.B.C.D/maskbits) ? The specific documentation page I was looking at, i.e.: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch06.html was rather entirely ambiguous on this one small point. When describing the interfaces clause, it says explicitly that CIDRs

I have just installed CentOS 5.1 on my home server and I am trying to set a mail server. I have diligently followed the instructions on the Wiki - How To on the CentOS website (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix). However I cannot send internal email (I haven't yet tried externally). Do you have any suggestions on what to check? To test it I used two normail user: giulio and federica.

In case it's any use for debugging, I get these error messages in dmesg on my NV86 (Quadro NVS 140M) card: [ 21.729435] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [ 21.749414] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0 [ 21.749425] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 [ 21.749432] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 21.749528]

Helo hostname MUST have resolvable hostname. Crazy or not, but i use this. The _access-allow parts for server you really trust. smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination, check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/check_client_access-allow.cidr, reject_unknown_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_hostname, reject_invalid_hostname,

In message <ca330312-5343-b7e5-328a-d2b554330081 at thelounge.net>, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >Am 17.10.2017 um 04:24 schrieb Ronald F. Guilmette via samba: >> Just a trivial question... >> >> Do the hosts allow and hosts deny clauses (i.e. within smb.conf) support >> the use of IPv4 CIDR notation (e.g. A.B.C.D/maskbits) ? >>

I have a few settings that change based on the network that a system is in, and I have a heterogeneous collection of networks (a few /24s, some /25s, a /29 and a couple /27s, and hey look a /16 in rfc1918 space and...). So I can''t do simple regex matches on dotted-quad IP notation and expect to get a complete story. What I''d like is something like, I dunno... $nameserver =

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=854 Summary: xtables_ipmask_to_cidr error code leaks into output of iptables --list Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: iptables

Dear openssh-unix-dev list, in OpenSSH 5.1 you introduced CIDR address/masklen matching for "Match address" blocks in sshd_config as well as supporting CIDR matching in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys from="..." restrictions in sshd. I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would be quite