similar to: imap connection problems

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "imap connection problems"

2007 Mar 05
3
Bug: mbox-sync-parse.c: line 228
[root at mail postfix]# dovecot --version 1.0.rc25 [root at mail postfix]# dovecot -n # /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf ssl_cert_file: /usr/share/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key_file: /usr/share/ssl/private/dovecot.pem login_dir: /usr/local/var/run/dovecot/login login_executable: /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login mbox_write_locks: fcntl auth default: passdb: driver: pam userdb: driver:
2007 Mar 02
2
rc25: need_space assert, core
Timo, I see where at least one other person reported this, but here goes. I went from rc24 to rc25 this morning, and I got an assert and core from my own mailbox withing five minutes: Mar 2 06:52:26 karst dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(jaearick): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 408: assertion failed: (need_space == (uoff_t)-mails[idx].space) Mar 2 06:52:26 karst dovecot: [ID 107833
2007 Mar 02
3
Upgrade dovecot - rpm or spec
His Friends, I've been using dovecot-1.0.alpha5 for a long time, now i would like to update to v.1.0.rc24 on my Red Hat ES 4 machine, so i need an rpm version that i couldn't find on the web. Also now i can build the rpm package via SPECS, which i don't have. Plis, anybody would help? Thanks in advanced, Alfredo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
2007 Mar 01
2
Timeout while logging in
Hi, sometimes there is a timeout, while logging in. Dovecot-rc24 Dovecot uses PAM, PAM uses a LDAP server. Solaris 10 The log, if everything is ok: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=POP3 secured lip=x.x.x.x rip=x.x.x.x resp= auth(default): client out: CONT 1 auth(default): client in: CONT<hidden> auth(default): client out: OK 1
2007 Mar 07
3
1.0.rc26 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz.sig Most importantly this should fix mbox problems in recent RCs. * Changed --with-headers to --enable-header-install * If time moves backwards only max. 5 seconds, sleep until we're back in the original present instead of killing ourself. An error is still logged. - IMAP: With
2007 Mar 07
3
1.0.rc26 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz.sig Most importantly this should fix mbox problems in recent RCs. * Changed --with-headers to --enable-header-install * If time moves backwards only max. 5 seconds, sleep until we're back in the original present instead of killing ourself. An error is still logged. - IMAP: With
2008 Feb 11
2
merging Maildir from old machine to new machine
Dovecot version 1.0.rc26. Situation is essentially a forklift upgrade to make more horsepower available for email. Given a new mail store using Postfix and Dovecot (Maildir), is it possible to transfer from the old mail box (running the same config) or will this generate problems with the various indices maintained by Dovecot? Kind regards and thanks/ldv Larry Vaden Internet Texoma, Inc.
2007 Jul 09
2
Quota exceeded messages
When I try to move messages between folders I get 'Quota exceeded' messages. I installed dovecot without any major configuration and accounts are created with PostfixAdmin. Is there some common setting that I must be missing? Version in use is 1.0 rc26 - Frank
2007 Feb 24
1
(auth) killed with signal 11
Running rc24 and with one user in particular they are getting "(auth) killed with signal 11" when trying to pop email. IMAP works. What causes this? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070224/195f61be/attachment-0002.html>
2007 Mar 14
4
solaris 10 + dovecot (1)
hi... i try to make dovecot (v1.0.r26) in solaris 10 and i have the following problem # ./configure --with-ldap ... ... Install prefix ...................... : /usr/local File offsets ........................ : 64bit I/O loop method ..................... : poll File change notification method ..... : none Building with SSL support ........... : yes (OpenSSL) Building with IPv6 support ..........
2007 May 02
1
upgrading to dovecot 1.0
hi, i'm using dovecot 1.0 rc26 and i want to upgrade to dovecot 1.0; i want to know if i must uninstall previus version or i can install overriding prevus install . Thanks in advance!!!
2008 Jan 14
1
Unexplained MDA bounce backs
I have recently noticed that some of our internal mailer scripts are causing Dovecot-LDA to generate Mailer Delivery Subsystem messages. The following Dovecot-LDA message is generated: ---- Message body ---- Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent. The following reason was given: Unknown error ---- Message body ---- ---- Message header ---- Return-Path:
2007 Mar 07
1
Changed CONTROL= path causes POP3 to fail, whereas IMAP is working (rc25 & rc26)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm testing some configurations, in the process I used a wrong user setting causing POP3 (get new messages) to fail, whereas IMAP was still working. An easy fix was to remove the entire /var/cache/dovecot/1012/ directory, both index and index/control were re-created and do work. So my guess is that the existance of the indexes causes
2007 Mar 22
5
rc2x seems to break Pegasus Mail
Hi guys, I upgraded from rc7 to rc24 a couple weeks ago, and noticed today that Pegasus Mail's IMAP no longer connects. So I put rc27 in, and it worked, but only for a little while... I'm not sure what the problem might be, the logs look fine, and I can still use Horde and Evolution without a problem. Pegasus Mail's error is unfortunately not helpful. Restarting rc27 didn't
2006 Mar 19
1
HFC USB (was MultiBRI in Australia - found one - maybe)
> Hmm, > > I was using 0.3.0 rc24, or the unstable branch. I see 0.2.0 is listed as > 'stable' so maybe I should have used that. Please do keep me informed of > your progress. > > Craig After finally getting chan_misdn to load (missing #include to bitops.h under Debian at least) it still won't load, and won't tell me why even with all the debug stuff
2007 Feb 23
1
rc19 - (_view_lookup_uid_range): assertion failed
Apologies if this is an <=rc19 thing, but am waiting for rc24 to come into Debian unstable/testing before upgrading. After purging ~10 messages from INBOX the index's appeared to go into a broken state. Mail client (Outlook express) reported "unable to read message flags". Logged messages: Feb 23 17:34:58 mailget01 dovecot: IMAP(drawkcab at drawkcab.com): file mail-index-view.c:
2007 Feb 24
2
problem with NFS from Microsoft Windows Services for Unix
Hi all, I'm using dovecot 1.0 RC24 compiled form source on a OpenBSD 4.0, I use IMAP service with maildir storage and my mail client is Outlook 2003. If the root of the user maildir stay on the BSD filesystem everything is right. If the root of the maildir is mount on an NFS drive on Microsoft Windows 2003 server, I always have the same error when I try to move mail (under Outlook) form my
2007 Mar 08
5
1.0rc26: ssl_verify_client=yes ?
Q1) I can't get ssl_verify_client_cert=yes working. The ssl key and cert are signed using our CA. Also the ssl_ca_file has a CRL appended (no revokes yet). Expected behavior: Stop the SSL (the client doesn't have a cert installed) Current behavior: Mail clients accepts SSL and login succeeds. (both Evolution and Thunderbird). My bad? Please advise. Q2) The next step, if dovecot blocks
2007 Mar 22
5
netapp/maildir/dovecot performance
We are seeing some poor performance recently that is focused around users with large mailboxes (100,000 message /INBOX, 80,000 message subfolders, etc). The performance problem manifests as very high system% utilization - basically iowait for NFS. There are two imap servers with plenty of horsepower/memory/etc. They are connected to a 3050c cluster via gig-e. Here are the mount options:
2006 Nov 08
2
centos3.8 - outdated coreutils package
Hello, I have a number centos3.8 installations. Recently I have figured out that version of coreutils is : [ivan at algol ivan]$ rpm -q coreutils coreutils-4.5.3-28.1 while RedHat has released an bux fix errata to that package: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0670.html Actually I discovered that when I encounter bug that should be fixed by this update: