similar to: Problem installing some r-packages via spack

I saw an email about 8.0.1 being not quite out, and planning for 9.0.0. When is 8.0.1 supposed to come out? I installed llvm at develop on x86 on March 30, and its clang says it is version 9.0.0 (trunk 357348). I tried to do another spack install llvm at develop, but it said that I already had it installed. Does that mean there were no changes since March 30, or does spack not look for any

Hello R-devel, Currently on Unix-like systems, Sys.which incorporates the absolute path to the `which` executable, obtained at the configure stage: > ## hopefully configure found [/usr]/bin/which > which <- "@WHICH@" > if (!nzchar(which)) { > warning("'which' was not found on this platform") This poses a problem for the Spack package

Thank you. > On Jul 3, 2019, at 4:04 AM, Justin Clift <justin at postgresql.org> wrote: > > On 2019-07-01 00:22, Marty Itzkowitz via llvm-dev wrote: >> I also tried spack install llvm at develop on a POWER9 (ppc641e) >> machine, but I can not find a compiler that >> will compile it. gcc 4.8.5 is reported as too old, and gcc 7.3.0 and >> 8.1.0 both fail in

Dear everyone, Your code is slow and you are interested in performance optimization for scientific software? Figuring out where’s the bottlenecks guided by performance evaluation tools. If you are interested in porting your code to a HPC hardware platform and architecture, than OpenACC as a user-driven directive-based performance-portable parallel programming model might be a solution. What are

PI OS - Debian12 - Raspberry PI 5 NUT 2.8.1 I'm building from source just downloaded from GITHUB. The error when starting NUT: nut-monitor: /usr/sbin/upssched not found I did a 'find / ' and upssched is not in the filesystem. I've done a make clean, make uninstall. then autogen.sh, make, make install 1. is there an option to make that completely removes everything? In

Hi, It may be useful for testing purpose to know if a generated password hash correspond to a given clear password. This can be useful to check if a hash generated by another program can be verified by Dovecot without any errors. This patch adds the ability the verify a password hash using `doveadm pw` via the `-V` option. ??? $ doveadm pw -s SSHA.hex ??? Enter new password: ??? Retype new

>>>>> Fox, John >>>>> on Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:32:13 +0000 writes: > Dear Herve, > Sorry, I should have said "matrices" rather than "data frames" -- brief() has methods for both. > Best, > John > ----------------------------- > John Fox, Professor Emeritus > McMaster University >

Dear all. I'm creating a new domain using Debian12 and samba 4.20.2. I've created 2 DC and one FS. Checking DNS I can see PTR records for DC servers are wrong (on DNS is recorded 2 and 3 PTR records instead of 242 and 243 that are last IP numbers in IPv4 address DCs) and for FS does not exists. The first one seems to be a bug on DNS record generation. The second one seems to be that I

On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:45:20 +0200 Josep Maria Gorro via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear all. > > I'm creating a new domain using Debian12 and samba 4.20.2. > I've created 2 DC and one FS. > Checking DNS I can see PTR records for DC servers are wrong (on DNS > is recorded 2 and 3 PTR records instead of 242 and 243 that are last > IP numbers in

Harmen, thanks for the additional details, it wasn't exactly clear what this is about. Ivan's post didn't mention that the issue here is the caching, not the path replacement which you are apparently already doing, now it makes more sense. I still think it is dangerous as you have no way of knowing who else is caching values at installation time since there is no reason to assume

Without seeing more details it's impossible to tell, but it might have been me. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6102310d814ad73eab60a88b21dd70874f7a056f#diff-0f9a49c4e31c311a0010e126cd785f08 changed PHI node equality check, but there were some users that implicitly depended on the old definition of the PHI equality, and didn't verify their implicit assumptions with reality,

Hi, after I setup one working Samba today, I tried to do exactly the same in another domain. I created a privileged debian12 container and installed samba. I have a MS Win driven AD (3 DCs). First I had not all in upper case in krb.conf. I learnt uppercase is needed and fixed it. To go sure I left domain, killed the container and started again from scratch (hope nothing is stored anywhere). I

Il 03/12/24 10:13, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:15:36 +0100 > Mitja Tav?ar via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, i have some problems with a recently joined Read Only Domain >> controller. >> >> I had 2 Domain Controllers based on Windows Server 2019 (hosts >> vmw2srvdc1 an vmw2srvdc2). I and i recently

>>>>> Michael Chirico >>>>> on Sun, 15 Sep 2019 20:52:34 +0800 writes: > Finally read in detail your response Gabe. Looks great, > and I agree it's quite intuitive, as well as agree against > non-recycling. > Once the length(n) == length(dim(x)) behavior is enabled, > I don't think there's any need/desire to have

Hi Martin et al. Sorry for not getting back onto this sooner. I've been pretty well buried under travel plus being sick for a bit, but I will be happy to roll up a patch for this, including documentation and put it into a wishlist item. I'll aim to do that at some point next week. Thanks @Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> for engaging with us and being willing to

On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 11:25:35 +0100 Mitja Tav?ar via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Il 03/12/24 10:13, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:15:36 +0100 > > Mitja Tav?ar via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi, i have some problems with a recently joined Read Only Domain > >> controller. >

Dear Herve, The brief() generic function in the car package does something very similar to that for data frames (and has methods for other classes of objects as well). Best, John ----------------------------- John Fox, Professor Emeritus McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Web: http::/socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox > On Sep 17, 2019, at 2:52 AM, Pages, Herve <hpages at

Dear Herve, Sorry, I should have said "matrices" rather than "data frames" -- brief() has methods for both. Best, John ----------------------------- John Fox, Professor Emeritus McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Web: http::/socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox > On Sep 17, 2019, at 8:29 AM, Fox, John <jfox at mcmaster.ca> wrote: > > Dear Herve,

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.3.0-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I've just set up a fresh Jessie system using the installer dated 2014-03-05, then installed and enabled Xen 4.3. I've done this quite a few times before using Wheezy and 4.1. I set up xenbr0, then created a test domU using xen-create-image, which completed without issue. However I was unable to start the new

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.3.0-3 Severity: normal # cpuperf-xen /usr/sbin/cpuperf-xen: 6: exec: /usr/lib/xen-4.3/bin/cpuperf-xen: not found Exit 127 # ls -l `which cpuperf-xen` lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Oct 17 17:24 /usr/sbin/cpuperf-xen -> ../lib/xen-common/bin/xen-utils-wrapper* I don't know what cpu-perf-xen does. But if it is supposed to be in the package, I expect to be