similar to: 1.0rc26: ssl_verify_client=yes ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "1.0rc26: ssl_verify_client=yes ?"

2007 Mar 26
3
proxy host specified as fqdn in userdb
Abstract from http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy > > host=s: The destination server's *IP address*. This field is required. > Note that currently it's required to use an IP address since no DNS > resolving is done. > Hello Timo, Here goes one more item for the v2.0 wishlist: Will it become possible to do dovecot imap proxying based on a
2007 Aug 21
2
userdb override?
Hi, I used to change the mailbox root for some users using a custom userdb file which contains lines like: doe::20000:200::/u/doe::userdb_mail=mbox:/u/doe/Mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u The logfiles shows the mail location stays default ( rc15 worked ): --- dovecot: Aug 21 09:43:49 Info: auth(default): master out: USER 250 doe system_user=doe uid=20324 gid=200 home=/u/doe dovecot: Aug
2007 Mar 07
1
Changed CONTROL= path causes POP3 to fail, whereas IMAP is working (rc25 & rc26)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm testing some configurations, in the process I used a wrong user setting causing POP3 (get new messages) to fail, whereas IMAP was still working. An easy fix was to remove the entire /var/cache/dovecot/1012/ directory, both index and index/control were re-created and do work. So my guess is that the existance of the indexes causes
2017 Sep 13
2
[RFC master-2.2 0/1] Support OpenSSL 1.1 API for setting allowed TLS versions
Hi, I came up with the following patch while trying to figure out a good solution for the situation described in Debian bug #871987[1]. In short, OpenSSL in Debian unstable has disabled TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1 *by default*. That means that unless an application requests otherwise, only TLSv1.2 is supported. In the world of e-mail this is seemingly an issue, as there are still way too many old clients
2007 Aug 30
1
Using NID_x500UniqueIdentifier as ssl_username_from_cert
Hi, please have a look at the attached patch for dovecot-1.0.3 These patch modifies ssl_proxy_get_peer_name() to use the NID_x500UniqueIdentifier as username instead of NID_commonName. The reason is, that the Common Name doesn't have to be unique for the whole mailserver. Example; in germany a lot of people got the first name "Andreas" and the last name "Schulz".
2007 Mar 07
3
1.0.rc26 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz.sig Most importantly this should fix mbox problems in recent RCs. * Changed --with-headers to --enable-header-install * If time moves backwards only max. 5 seconds, sleep until we're back in the original present instead of killing ourself. An error is still logged. - IMAP: With
2007 Mar 07
3
1.0.rc26 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc26.tar.gz.sig Most importantly this should fix mbox problems in recent RCs. * Changed --with-headers to --enable-header-install * If time moves backwards only max. 5 seconds, sleep until we're back in the original present instead of killing ourself. An error is still logged. - IMAP: With
2008 Feb 11
2
merging Maildir from old machine to new machine
Dovecot version 1.0.rc26. Situation is essentially a forklift upgrade to make more horsepower available for email. Given a new mail store using Postfix and Dovecot (Maildir), is it possible to transfer from the old mail box (running the same config) or will this generate problems with the various indices maintained by Dovecot? Kind regards and thanks/ldv Larry Vaden Internet Texoma, Inc.
2007 Mar 14
4
solaris 10 + dovecot (1)
hi... i try to make dovecot (v1.0.r26) in solaris 10 and i have the following problem # ./configure --with-ldap ... ... Install prefix ...................... : /usr/local File offsets ........................ : 64bit I/O loop method ..................... : poll File change notification method ..... : none Building with SSL support ........... : yes (OpenSSL) Building with IPv6 support ..........
2007 Jul 09
2
Quota exceeded messages
When I try to move messages between folders I get 'Quota exceeded' messages. I installed dovecot without any major configuration and accounts are created with PostfixAdmin. Is there some common setting that I must be missing? Version in use is 1.0 rc26 - Frank
2004 Dec 23
8
delivery agent in 1.0?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi :) Is there any plan to include delivery agent in 1.x? I would be very happy, if there would be lmtp delivery agent included with dovecot 1.x... This would make creating large mailsystem cluster creation very simple + indexes would be always up2date. Brane -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
2007 May 02
1
upgrading to dovecot 1.0
hi, i'm using dovecot 1.0 rc26 and i want to upgrade to dovecot 1.0; i want to know if i must uninstall previus version or i can install overriding prevus install . Thanks in advance!!!
2007 Mar 13
1
imap connection problems
Hi, Have encountered some strange behavior of dovecot: after few days of work (5-7 days, ~50 users, imap over ssl or tls) dovecot stops respond with "* OK Dovecot ready.". I.e. connection gets accepted, but no response from dovecot: [ivan at dyn-226 bin]$ telnet imap 143 Trying 192.168.100.9... Connected to imap.n-ix.com.ua (192.168.100.9). Escape character is '^]'. while
2008 Jan 14
1
Unexplained MDA bounce backs
I have recently noticed that some of our internal mailer scripts are causing Dovecot-LDA to generate Mailer Delivery Subsystem messages. The following Dovecot-LDA message is generated: ---- Message body ---- Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent. The following reason was given: Unknown error ---- Message body ---- ---- Message header ---- Return-Path:
2007 Mar 21
1
Unexpected behaviour when deleteing a big mailbox
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, my last tests left me with a mailbox with > 80'000 messages in Maildir. Dovecot served them fine. No problem. I usually use IMAP's "Mark messages a deleted" function and expunge later. Because the "Move to Trash" is default in many MUAs, I decided to try it on this mailbox. I do think that it is hard to
2007 Apr 11
1
dude with maildir location sintaxis under dovecot
hi... i want to use maildir format so like i see un some manuals i create this directory for my virtual users: # ls -la /export/home/vmail/prueba.uy/t* /export/home/vmail/prueba.uy/toto1: total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 vmail vmail 512 Apr 10 15:09 . drwxr-xr-x 6 vmail vmail 512 Apr 9 12:11 .. /export/home/vmail/prueba.uy/toto3: total 10 drwxr-xr-x 5 vmail vmail 512 Mar
2007 Oct 08
1
Migration Issues UW-POP3
I am migrating from UW's POP3 server (mbox), to Dovecote (mbox -> maildir). Anyway, I am concerned about the Logging details offered by Dovecot, as I manage several details from the logging information provided by UW's Syslog information. Here's a sample of the UW information: Oct 7 22:08:39 ns6 ipop3d[15432]: pop3 service init from 66.207.133.233 Oct 7 22:08:39 ns6
2007 Mar 20
5
Stalled imaptest10 process
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, in order to stress my Dovecot test installation a bit, I compiled imaptest10.c. Now and then I see: Logi List Stat Sele Fetc Fet2 Copy Stor Dele Expu Appe Logo 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 33% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 30% 5% 5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1/
2006 Jul 07
2
Authentication by certificats (a bug or my misconfiguration)
Today I've been trying to get dovecot (1.0 rc2) to use certificates for client side authentication. If my memory serves right, beta8 had no problems with it (although it was some time ago and on different machine). Similar setup works perfectly well for postfix (for authentication that is, on the same machine). Originally I thought I overdid some certificate settings (keyUsage, nsCertType,
2007 Mar 07
4
Time moving backwards error
I'm running dovecot on an OpenBSD 3.7 server and after upgrading to RC25, the daemon started exiting with: Fatal: Time just moved backwards (1173221579 -> 1173221578)! This might cause a lot of problems, so I'll just kill myself now. After upgrading to RC26, I've gotten the error: Error: Time just moved backwards by 1 seconds. I'll sleep now until we're back in