Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Hot to get rid of \"DON\'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE\" messages?"
2007 Mar 29
1
locking question
There are three applications that have their mitts on files on my mail
server, which is running AIXV5.3 and UWIMAP and mbox format. The mail
folders and INBOXES are native to that machine, but also are NFS
exported to a login server and a mailing list server. All three
machines are running the lockd daemon.
Everybody wants to lock differently
1) procmail (delivering for sendmail), which
2007 May 04
2
sporadic slow/non response, problems copying to sent folder
After experiencing these symptoms through many of the release
candidates, we've been at v1.0.0 now for a few weeks, and they're still
there. Perhaps a config issue with my setup (mbox locks?). It's really
too disrupting to continue using this way. I've included symptoms,
client info, mta info, log entries and config file. What other
information can I provide? Please
2007 Apr 24
1
locking questions
I have Dovecot 1.0 in trial use by the IT staff, and have some locking
questions
Background, the mail server runs procmail, sendmail and NFS exports the
user homedir and mailbox to a) a login shell host and b) a mailing list
services host. It runs UWIMAP on the usual ports and dovecot on a
arbitrary port number. Because of concern with NFS and file access
contention. I have the following
2003 Sep 16
0
Locking foolishness - Better info
I realized that my last message about locking gave bad information -- or
rather, very little information.
Here's my setup:
- Home directories and user login information are located on an Xserve
running Mac OS X 10.2.6. Home directories are split between 2 different
directories -- /Users and /Students. Home dirs are exported via NFS to the
mail server. User login info is shared via LDAP
2009 Aug 04
2
1.2.3 - fchown failed messages
Hello,
I installed 1.2.3 and we are seeing a few messages in the log files such
as:
---
Aug 4 16:40:24 xyz dovecot: IMAP(john): fchown() failed with file
/home/john/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.log.newlock: Operation not permitted
Aug 4 16:40:24 xyz dovecot: IMAP(john): fchown() failed with file
/home/john/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.tmp: Operation not permitted
---
dovecot -n:
# 1.2.3:
2007 Mar 23
1
upload progress bar don''t work...please help
Hello,
I''m trying to install the upload_progress gem and i can''t see the upload
progress status.
My config is :
apache2 with mod_proxy
mongrel
rails
upload.rb : ##############
require ''rubygems''
require ''drb''
require ''gem_plugin''
GemPlugin::Manager.instance.load ''mongrel'' => GemPlugin::INCLUDE
2007 Mar 19
1
userdb static and doubled homedir problem
With following configuration:
userdb static {
args = uid=10000 gid=10000 home=/home/vmail/domain.tld/%u/./ mail=maildir:~/maildirs
}
and accompanying passdb passwd-file consisting of only user and password, for example
test:{PLAIN}test:
dovecot will access
home=/home/vmail/domain.tld/test/home/vmail/domain.tld/test/maildirs
instead of
home=/home/vmail/domain.tld/test/maildirs
dovecot
2007 Sep 26
1
deliver net_connect auth-master failed: Permission denied
Ok, I've ALMOST got this working ... I can run deliver as a user, but when
I try using it as the default delivery agent from sendmail, I get
deliver(userid): net_connect(/var/run/dovecot/auth-master) failed: Permission denied
Does deliver run as root, as the recipient's ID, sendmail's ID or
sendmail's GID? (I'm running freebsd)
Or am I totally clueless ??
Here is dovecot
2010 Aug 20
0
[PATCH] ocfs2: Don't delete orphaned files if we are in the process of umount.
Generally, orphan scan run in ocfs2_wq and is used to replay orphan
dir. So for some low end iscsi device, the delete_inode may take
a long time(In some devices, I have seen that delete 500 files will
take about 15 secs). This will eventually cause umount to
livelock(umount has to flush ocfs2_wq which will wait until orphan
scan to finish).
So this patch just try to finish the orphan scan
2006 Feb 07
1
locking problems with RHEL 3 and dovecot
I just migrated from a FreeBSD/Sendmail/UW-IMAP setup to RHEL
3/Postfix/Dovecot (1.0a5 currently). Both systems used Procmail as the final
delivery agent (into inboxes or .
Since the changeover, things have *mostly* been going ok, but I've been
having some problems that I think are locking-related.
I'm getting reports from users about IMAP hangs (mostly from Thunderbird).
Sometimes I see
2007 Mar 15
2
flock problems with index files and passwd-file
While experimenting a bit, I found that for some reason, locking indexes
with flock is problematic, but only if user is taken from passwd-file.
The host system is openbsd 3.9, dovecot's configuration is added at the
bottom.
Authentication is from two places - first from mentioned passwd-file,
then from passwd file using bsdauth (in this case, there're no problems
with flock). So, if
2007 Oct 24
2
"Can't sync delivery mail"
Dovecot 1.0.3
Deliver is saying this on two specific emails. Other emails to these 2
users are going through fine. Looking at the mail headers the only
thing questionable I see is:
From: "AMS Publication Division"@ams.org
Is this the problem?
# 1.0.3: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/
protocols: imap pop3
listen(default): *:143
listen(imap): *:143
listen(pop3):
2012 Mar 21
1
dovecot 2.0.19 Panic: file mail-index-sync-ext.c: line 209 (sync_ext_reorder): assertion failed: (offset < (uint16_t)-1)
Had a user who couldn't access his INBOX:
> Mar 21 09:21:17 penguina dovecot: imap([USER]): Panic: file
> mail-index-sync-ext.c: line 209 (sync_ext_reorder): assertion fai
> led: (offset < (uint16_t)-1)
> Mar 21 09:21:17 penguina dovecot: imap([USER]): Error: Raw backtrace:
> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0x342683c660] -> /usr
> /lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0
2008 Oct 30
3
Startup info message
Hi folks,
I'm using the latest Dovecot 1.16 with Postfix for my FreeBSD box. Since
v1.1.4
(if i remember correctly), the following message is displayed whenever
starting Dovecot.
"Info: If you have trouble with authentication failures, enable auth_debug
setting. See http://wiki.dovecot.org/WhyDoesItNotWork"
Besides that, Dovecot works great but I wonder what this message is all
2007 May 05
1
sporadic slow/non response, problems copying to, sent folder
>> symptoms:
>> 1. Coming back to the idle client, and clicking on a newly arrived
>> message, often a long delay (seems like minutes, sometimes) will
>> occur before the message loads from the server.
>> 2. Sending messages, as often as not, the client will stall,
>> sometimes indefinitely, on "copying message to sent folder".
>>
>
2005 Mar 13
1
1.0-test65
http://dovecot.org/test/
If dovecot-auth was crashing with you, this release should fix it. I
don't know when it did though, I just applied a patch from Andrey Panin
with that description :)
Fixed also another dovecot-auth crash with Solaris and maybe some other
systems.
Contains the first attempt of a Dovecot LDA. It's still in pretty ugly
shape, but it should work, more or less. I
2006 Jan 18
0
still strugling
Hi all,
After I posted yesterday, I'm still struggling with dovecot 1.0beta1
I installed it on openbsd with no problem. But I can't get it to
authenticate plaintext on Unixware.
I had to add two include files <sys/types.h> and <sys/mkdev.h> in
compat.h because minor and major where undefined on unixware. I doubt that
could fail...
What's wrong with that conf:
##
2005 Sep 23
0
Moving messages takes a longgggggg..... time. (Timeouts?) dovecot.conf help?
Hi,
I'm trying to get dovecot set up better. I am using 1.0alpha3. It
takes a long long time to move messages for some reason. It seems it
may be a timeout thing, because neither the client or server is using
any cpu time or disk i/o or network to speak of. (To move maybe 400
messages, it seems to take maybe half an hour, maybe longer.) With
alpha 2 I was getting messages from
2010 Jul 26
1
Permanent delete from Spam folder
Dear All,
I want that if someone delete the mail from SPAM folder
mail must be deleted permanently instead of moving the same to Trash
folder.
Is it possible with the dovecot right now ?
Please let me know the solution for the same.
Thanks
2009 Jul 04
0
1.1.16 and global ACLs
I was going to test 1.1.16 so as to see how it handles global ACLs (in
the hope to have a possible comparison with 1.2.0's odd behavior),
when I encountered the problem described hereafter.
Note that just disabling ACLs is sufficient to get back a fully
functional imap binary.
So, should there be some plans for a 1.1.17 version, perhaps could the
info provided here prove somewhat