similar to: [Bug 3756] New: ssh connection breaks after openssl is upgraded

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3755 Bug ID: 3755 Summary: ssh connection breaks after openssl is upgraded Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.7p1 Hardware: 68k OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hi, I'm using ProxyJump via a local sshd (in a separate network namespace) to connect to a remote host. It works fine the first time, but if I connect several times in a row in a short period of time, I suddenly get a "Connection reset by peer" error. This happens to be reproducible. If I wait a few seconds (let's say 15 seconds), the connection is restored. I have tried to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3582 Bug ID: 3582 Summary: Confusing error message when using ProxyJump Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1746 Bug ID: 1746 Summary: Connection Tracking - TC_DROP in SK_BUFF Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: nf_conntrack Assignee:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1747 Bug ID: 1747 Summary: Connection Tracking - TC_DROP in SK_BUFF Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: nf_conntrack Assignee:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3729 Bug ID: 3729 Summary: the new sshd does not work under the supervision of inetd Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.8p1 Hardware: ARM OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: sshd

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3666 Bug ID: 3666 Summary: sshd crash Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Reporter:

Has anyone gotten CID from Bell Canada to work properly with *? We have our * box down at our datacentre in St Louis, and whenever we call it from a Bell Canada Telephone line, all we see is '' for the CID. I did some digging on google and the mailing lists and couldn't find anything pertaining directly to Bell-Canada and * CID, but didn't find much. I did however find :

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:3756 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3756 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f195208ec80d673585ba407154a45b7b7db4537022ea334e3d03a68272d320f1 thunderbird-68.2.0-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm x86_64:

IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing September 8-11, 2015 Chicago, IL, USA http://www.mcs.anl.gov/ieeecluster2015/ **** NEWS **** * 38 full papers accepted out of 157 submissions (24% acceptance rate) * 28 short papers with oral presentations * 30 peer-reviewed posters * 3 keynotes * 6 workshops * Panel on exascale computing * 2 industry sessions with talks from Cray

IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing September 8-11, 2015 Chicago, IL, USA http://www.mcs.anl.gov/ieeecluster2015/ **** NEWS **** * 38 full papers accepted out of 157 submissions (24% acceptance rate) * 28 short papers with oral presentations * 30 peer-reviewed posters * 3 keynotes * 6 workshops * Panel on exascale computing * 2 industry sessions with talks from Cray

Dear OpenSSH developers, a publicly accessible sshd on port 22 generates a lot of log clutter from unauthenticated connections. For an exemplary host on a university network, sshd accumulates 5~20k log lines on a single day (more than 90% of the total amount of syslog lines). That is despite the host having a restricted configuration (no SSH password authentication, firewall rate limit for

On Thursday, September 02, 2010, Frank Heckes wrote: > Hi all, > > for some of our OSSes a massive amount of errors like: > > Sep 2 20:28:15 jf61o02 kernel: blk_rq_check_limits: over max size > limit. > > appearing in /var/log/messages (and dmesg). Does anyone have got a clue > how-to get of the root cause? Many thanks in advance. linux/block/blk-core.c int

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.19 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. NEW FEATURES/CHANGES ==================== Migrated smbget to use common command line parser ------------------------------------------------- The smbget utility implemented its own command line parsing logic. After discovering

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.19 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. NEW FEATURES/CHANGES ==================== Migrated smbget to use common command line parser ------------------------------------------------- The smbget utility implemented its own command line parsing logic. After discovering

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 06:19:28PM +0000, Matt Lupfer wrote: > The event handler calls scsi_scan_host() when events are missed, which > will hotplug new LUNs. However, this function won't remove any > unplugged LUNs. The result is that hotunplug doesn't work properly when > the number of unplugged LUNs exceeds the event queue size (currently 8). > > Scan existing LUNs

Hi, Due to limitations of our Storage we need to set the device queue_depth to 4. I did this with a script that basically does this: echo 4 > /sys/block/sdft/device/queue_depth. But after a few minutes it starts to grow until it reaches 32 again. What could cause that behavior? Furthermore the system doesn' t load my qlogic options. I have set them to: cat /etc/modprobe.d/qlogic.conf

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 01:21:53PM -0600, Greg Edwards wrote: > Commands with protection information included were not truncating the > protection iov_iter to the number of protection bytes in the command. > This resulted in vhost_scsi mis-calculating the size of the protection > SGL in vhost_scsi_calc_sgls(), and including both the protection and > data SG entries in the protection

Dan Gohman wrote: > On Mar 15, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >> Pierre Habouzit wrote: >>> [ please CC: me as I'm not subscribed ] >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:13:34AM +0000, bugzilla- >>> daemon at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >>>> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3756 >>>> >>>> Chris Lattner

Le Thu, 4 Dec 2014 08:42:37 -0500 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> ?crivait: > On Dec 4, 2014, at 5:30 AM, Frantz de Germain <frantz at info.univ-angers.fr> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > does any one know how to change the date of the self tests on APC UPSes ? > > I'd like to be able to choose the day and the hour so that it happens at >