similar to: keeping indexes in tmpfs

I'm using deliver (1.0.5) with Postfix (2.1.6). I made a test for a few minutes in a moderated busy server. While most mails was delivered, a lot of them failed with this error: deliver(userfoo): Oct 15 09:58:31 Error: net_connect(/var/run/dovecot/auth-master) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable Sounds to me something like not enough auth-master to answer every concurrent deliver. Any

I'm using dict quota like so: quota = dict:User quota::file:/[path]/quotas/%u [path]/quotas/ is a tmpfs. The idea is to do less work on disk. Other than forcing dovecot to rebuild quotas on a reboot, are there any downsides? Thanks, Ken -- Ken Anderson Pacific Internet - http://www.pacific.net

I'm finally picking my dovecot project back up now, and after upgrading rc19 to rc27, I sent a test message to an existing account which resulted in log entries like these: Mar 16 08:45:37 node7 deliver(user at example.com): Corrupted transaction log file /var/indexes/example/com/u/us/user/.INBOX/dovecot.index.log: Append with UID 3, but next_uid = 15368 Mar 16 08:45:37 node7

Hey, the following line in fstab used to work just fine for my /tmp: tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw,size=1g,mode=1777 0 0 But since I upgraded to 8.2-PRERELEASE, /tmp will soon run out of space (usually after leaving the box overnight). % df /tmp Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on tmpfs 12 12 0 100% /tmp Yes, what you see here, is not

I have a server where we use tmpfs as a cache for temporary files used by a web application. But occasionally this tmpfs thinks it is full when it isn't. [root at flask-yellow tmpfs]# touch file touch: cannot touch `file': No space left on device [root at flask-yellow tmpfs]# df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on none 393216 19296

Hi, I am running the below command on CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core) # df -hT --total Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/xvda1 xfs 150G 8.0G 143G 6% / devtmpfs devtmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev/shm tmpfs tmpfs 7.8G 817M 7.0G 11% /run tmpfs tmpfs 7.8G 0

Does someone have a working tmp on tmpfs via systemctl enable tmp.mount under CentOS8/RHEL8? This seems to work straight in EL7 ... # LANG=C systemctl enable tmp.mount The unit files have no installation config (WantedBy, RequiredBy, Also, Alias settings in the [Install] section, and DefaultInstance for template units). This means they are not meant to be enabled using systemctl. Possible

Am 22.10.19 um 04:52 schrieb Orion Poplawski: > On 10/21/19 3:42 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> Does someone have a working tmp on tmpfs via >> >> systemctl enable tmp.mount >> >> under CentOS8/RHEL8? This seems to work straight in EL7 ... >> >> >> # LANG=C systemctl enable tmp.mount >> The unit files have no installation config

Sorry this is off-topic, but I'm scrambling to get this system in, google didn't help, and I'm sure someone on this list knows the answer cold. I'm trying to nfs-export a tmpfs disk. I saw a hint from a response about ram disks... which leads to my guess that tmpfs simply doesn't implement some method that nfsd needs. I can probably survive without tmpfs, but I'd like to

Ok, here's the short and sweet version of my dilemma. I have a group of servers mounting a shared NFS device to hold mail data for many different domains. Is it worth the load balancing management nightmare of setting up dedicating smtp, pop, and imap to one server (failing over to another in the group if the server goes down) to keep indexes on local disk? It's very tempting to just

I've set up a 1GB tmpfs filesystem on a system with a single IDE disk and 2GB's of memory. I'm storing a large amount of RRD files (~300MB) on the tmpfs filesystem to make their generation a bit speedier... this part works great. However, I want to rsync these files over from time to time to a directory on the local filesystem (same physical server). I'm using rsync 2.6.4pre3

Hi all, I have some AVC in the logs and wonder how to resolve this: Under EL8 (enforcing SElinux) I have /var/lib/php/session mounted as tmpfs. # tail -1 /etc/fstab tmpfs /var/lib/php/session tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=770,gid=apache,size=16777216,context="system_u:object_r:httpd_var_run_t:s0" 0 0 # df -a |grep php tmpfs 16384 0 16384 0%

Hi, I've seen that in the past, libvirt couldn't start VMs when the disk image was stored on a file system that doesn't support direct I/O having the 'cache=none' configuration [0]. On the KubeVirt project, we have some storage tests on a particular provider which does just that - try to create / start a VM whose disk is on tmpfs and whose definition features

Dear Sirs, I've a question belonging to the run-init utility. I'm trying to boot a full linux system from ram. Therefore I provide a kernel and initrd from a tftp server. The full rootfs is provided through a nfs-server and is at time a cpio-archive. That archive shall be copied to the local client and mounted in a tmpfs partition. After that, I want replace the oldroot bei the root

Am 26.07.20 um 12:23 schrieb Strahil Nikolov: > > ?? 25 ??? 2020 ?. 14:20:19 GMT+03:00, Leon Fauster via CentOS <centos at centos.org> ??????: >> Hi all, >> >> I have some AVC in the logs and wonder how to resolve this: Under >> EL8 (enforcing SElinux) I have /var/lib/php/session mounted as tmpfs. >> >> >> # tail -1 /etc/fstab >> tmpfs

Hi all, As suggested on the forum by Phil ( https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=22594&forum=37&post_id=87597#forumpost87597 ) I would like to contribute a howto on how to put /tmp on tmpfs (or shm as it used to be called). I would also like to add a bit of background information on why you would possibly want such a thing. Here are my wiki details: wiki login:

Has anyone ever mounted their /var/lib/mysql on a tmpfs or ramfs? Are there any performance gains to be made doing this? TIA

tmpfs has a known bug of O(n^2) behavior with lseek(SEEK_HOLE); this is one situation where the noextents filter can come in handy to avoid the performance penalty of exposing accurate extents. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- filters/noextents/nbdkit-noextents-filter.pod | 7 ++++++- plugins/file/nbdkit-file-plugin.pod | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 14

As part of looking into a minor issue with the group listed when using runat(1) on a UFS filesystem for Johannes (my Google Summer of Code student work on new basic file privs), I discovered an even bigger issue with UFS and extended attributes. I''ve cc''d ZFS discuss because I used ZFS as the comparison and I believe that ZFS is acting correctly but even then it might not be

Hello all, I''d like to report a tricky situation and a workaround I''ve found useful - hope this helps someone in similar situations. To cut the long story short, I could not properly mount some datasets from a readonly pool, which had a non-"legacy" mountpoint attribute value set, but the mountpoint was not available (directory absent or not empty). In this case