Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "tdb_expand overflow detected"
2024 Nov 18
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Dan Langille via samba wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using samba416-4.16.11 on FreeBSD 14.1 (on ZFS, in a jail, with
> quotas on those filesystems, etc)
>
> I'm seeing these entries in my logs. Is this something which needs
> action? If not, I'll start ignoring them.
>
> Nov 11 19:00:45 tm samba-dcerpcd[7373]: [2024/11/11
2024 Nov 19
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
On 19/11/24 02:27, Dan Langille via samba wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Dan Langille via samba wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm using samba416-4.16.11 on FreeBSD 14.1 (on ZFS, in a jail, with
>> quotas on those filesystems, etc)
>>
>> I'm seeing these entries in my logs. Is this something which needs
>> action? If not, I'll start
2024 Nov 19
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
> On 19/11/24 02:27, Dan Langille via samba wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Dan Langille via samba wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm using samba416-4.16.11 on FreeBSD 14.1 (on ZFS, in a jail, with
>>> quotas on those filesystems, etc)
>>>
>>> I'm seeing these
2024 Nov 20
1
tdb_expand overflow detected
On 20/11/24 11:55, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hope that helps.
Not much unfortunately.
Running this:
net cache list
will tell you what the cache thinks it contains. If it is filled with
real things, it could indicate where they're coming from. If it fails or
shows a cache full of nonsense, well that is also interesting.
>
> The original messages are long scrolled off the
2018 Jun 17
3
Connection problem due to tdb_lock failed
We are using Samba 4.6.15. We have users not being able to login. winbindd log shows this:
[2018/06/14 14:48:44.300203, 0, pid=3228] ../source3/rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:3292(cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel_with_creds)
netlogon_creds_cli_get returned NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
[2018/06/14 14:53:43.896350, 0, pid=3228] ../lib/tdb_wrap/tdb_wrap.c:64(tdb_wrap_log)
2019 Jun 19
2
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
So I re run the test with domain users gid 14513
Still not working (sssd stopped, nsswitch.cnf with? "files winbind" for
passwd group, # net cache flush + restart winbindd smb)
On the samba server :
# wbinfo -i MYDOMAIN\usertest
MYDOMAIN\usertest:*:10430:*14513*:user TEST:/home/usertest:/bin/bash
In log, I have :
myw7worstation.log
/[2019/06/19 12:04:29.496822,? 1]
2012 Mar 22
2
Debugging tdb_oob log messages in samba 3.6
Hello samba list,
We're trialling Samba 3.6 and on some of our systems I see the following type
of messages in the smbd and winbind logs:
[2012/03/16 17:28:59.038177, 0] ../lib/util/tdb_wrap.c:65(tdb_wrap_log)
tdb(/var/lib/samba/messages.tdb): tdb_oob len 663932 beyond eof at 12288
[2012/03/16 17:28:59.038331, 0] ../lib/util/tdb_wrap.c:65(tdb_wrap_log)
2019 Mar 12
3
sometimes users fails to login
Hello,
I have Samba 4.6 as AD domain member and sometime the users fails to
login, the issue disappear after some minutes.
I have enabled log leve 10 and I can see the following errors:
2019/03/12 09:20:32.280799, 5, pid=15466, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
../source3/lib/username.c:181(Get_Pwnam_alloc)
Finding user BITINTRA\U002489
[2019/03/12 09:20:32.281111, 5, pid=15466, effective(0,
2019 Jun 19
2
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
The 2 commands works :
# getent passwd MYDOMAIN\\usertest
MYDOMAIN\\usertest:*:10430:14513:user TEST:/home/usertest:/bin/bash
# getent group MYDOMAIN\\"Utilisateurs du domaine"
MYDOMAIN\utilisateurs du domaine:x:14513:
I have to put "Utilisateurs du domaine" instead of Domain\ Users because
the Windows AD is a french AD.
Le 19/06/2019 ? 12:32, Rowland penny via samba a
2019 Jun 19
2
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
Hello,
I performed a test in order to get access to my samba share with
winbindd (and not sssd).
For that,
1. I change the gid of domain users from 513 to 15513 (to match with the
domain range 10000 - 14999)
And verify my test user is part of 15513
2. Stop sssd and change nsswitch.conf like this :
/passwd:???? files winbind//
//shadow:???? files//
//group:????? files //winbind//
/
3.
2019 Apr 01
1
gencache.tdb: device busy
On a fresh installed Illumos/Solaris in a VirtualBox Guest I get the following error after starting up samba 4.10:
[2019/04/01 09:51:41.112485, 0] ../../lib/tdb_wrap/tdb_wrap.c:64(tdb_wrap_log)
tdb(/var/samba/lock/gencache.tdb): tdb_open_ex: tdb_mutex_init failed for /var/samba/lock/gencache.tdb: Device busy
[2019/04/01 09:51:41.141396, 0] ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:136(daemon_ready)
2019 Jun 18
2
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
Is it possible to make start DOMAIN range from 500 instead of 10000 ?
I realized that all my gid are in range 500 to 600 and not in range
10000 - 14999
I thought? DOMAIN range 10000 - 14999 was reserved for DOMAIN users
-------- Message transf?r? --------
Sujet?: Re: [Samba] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
Date?: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:25:39 -0300
De?: Edouard Guign? via
2012 Apr 26
1
mutex.tdb locking errors on Solaris 10
Hi,
We are experiencing a problem with Samba 3.6.4 on Solaris 10 update 10. This problem has only recently started since an upgrade to v3.6.3 and was still present after rebuilding to 3.6.4. We are using the version of samba packaged by OpenCSW.
>From a client perspective, the issue is manifested as intermittent very poor performance or intermittent inability to save a file to the share at
2018 Jun 17
0
Connection problem due to tdb_lock failed
On Sun, 17 Jun 2018 12:06:17 +0000
Oren Kishon via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> We are using Samba 4.6.15. We have users not being able to login.
> winbindd log shows this:
>
>
> [2018/06/14 14:48:44.300203, 0,
> pid=3228] ../source3/rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:3292(cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel_with_creds)
> netlogon_creds_cli_get returned NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
2016 Dec 08
2
How to join join Ubuntu desktop to AD
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:54:17 -0500
lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 12/8/2016 1:14 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:03:49 -0500
> > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/8/2016 12:52 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:27:20
2019 Jun 19
0
Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kerberos and NTLMv2 authentication
On 19/06/2019 16:16, Edouard Guign? via samba wrote:
> So I re run the test with domain users gid 14513
>
> Still not working (sssd stopped, nsswitch.cnf with? "files winbind"
> for passwd group, # net cache flush + restart winbindd smb)
>
> On the samba server :
> # wbinfo -i MYDOMAIN\usertest
> MYDOMAIN\usertest:*:10430:*14513*:user
2020 Jun 05
0
Samba-4.11 AD DC initial setup
I have provisioned a AD DC using samba-4.11 and have completed the initial
startup. Reviewing the contents of /var/log/samba4/ I see this in
/var/log/samba4/smbd.log.smbd
. . .
[2020/06/05 15:55:18.663269, 2] ../../lib/tdb_wrap/tdb_wrap.c:64(tdb_wrap_log)
tdb(/var/db/samba4/registry.tdb): tdb_open_ex: could not open file
/var/db/samba4/registry.tdb: No such file or directory
[2020/06/05
2019 Mar 12
0
sometimes users fails to login
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:32:46 +0100
Andrea Cucciarre' via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have Samba 4.6 as AD domain member and sometime the users fails to
> login, the issue disappear after some minutes.
> I have enabled log leve 10 and I can see the following errors:
>
> 2019/03/12 09:20:32.280799, 5, pid=15466, effective(0, 0), real(0,
2013 Nov 15
0
NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS when winbindd under large traffic.
Hi list,
Thanks in advanced.
I have written a winbindd client software to do NTLM authentication by using WINBINDD_PAM_AUTH_CRAP message.
that is to say, my winbindd client is similar to ntlm_auth, but with high performance.
when I test it under large traffic, most of the time they all work well. and the transaction per second can reach more than 900.
but sometimes, winbindd will return
2012 Nov 05
7
VFS ACL with SMB2
Hello,
I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work
properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it
working corectly?
Best regards/Adrian Berlin
--