similar to: UID confusion

Is this Howto http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL actual also for Dovecot 2.x ? Cause i read Dovecot 1.x in the Howto Thank you for any hints / tipps Marko (from cold Hamburg Harbour)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi @ll, i try use acl with imap with dovecot latest but i dont get trough , is there more info online then written in the wiki ? i have a setup like http://wiki.dovecot.org/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL but with this acl dont seems to work , and folders arent reported with acls to i.e thnderbird - -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen Best Regards Robert

Hi @ll, with dovecot latest following http://wiki.dovecot.org/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL i have defined plugin { quota = maildir acl = vfile:/etc/dovecot/acls trash = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-trash.conf } Example dovecot-trash.conf file 1 Spam 2 Trash 3 Sent from wiki The Trash plugin. When saving a message would make user go over quota, this plugin automatically deletes the oldest mails from

hi, i'm migrating 1 mail-server from LDAP+postfix+courier to mysql+postfixadmin+dovecot, on a debian etch machine i have followed this howto : http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL (changed uid and gid for usage in debian, the SVN-postfixadmin didn't work for me, so i used the stable version, and haven't tested the SASL-part yet) this works great, except the

I have installed postfix, dovecot, mysql as per: http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL ..on Debian Etch. I thought mailboxes were created by postfixadmin or postfix but I only get an error: warning: connect to transport dovecot: No such file or directory ..in the postfix log. No /var/vmail/example.com is created. After creating the domain directory and user directory,

Hi, after deciding to use Dovecot 2.0.8 as a postfix LDA using mysql DB I'm running into some issues. I started to follow, http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL but noticed that the auth settings on the config changed, after looking through the dovecot wiki I think I have that issue fixed. However I still can't get the SQL part to work right, below is what I have on the

Better be quick! I am adding FMA4 and XOP now, and if you contribute code before I do, you can spare yourself some XOP merging. - Jan ----- Original Message ----- > From: David A. Greene <greened at obbligato.org> > To: Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at googlemail.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 12:19 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]

Tom , Thank you for correcting me here , All , Please review the changes made and is it ok to commit ?? Thanks ~Umesh On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > Hi Umesh, > > You should send patches to llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu, also each patch > should be its own plain-text attachment. > > -Tom > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:40 AM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > For a while now we (Cray) have had some very primitive cache structure > information encoded into our version of LLVM.  Given the more complex > memory structures introduced by Bulldozer and various accelerators, it's > time to do this Right (tm). > > So I'm looking for some feedback on a

Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at googlemail.com> writes: > On 30.11.2011, at 08:33, Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Hi Jan, >> >>> if I compile with dragonegg and -march=native I get this message: >>> 'bdver1' is not a recognized processor for this target (ignoring processor) >> >> this is coming directly from LLVM which doesn't know about

Dear All, Attached files is related to the changes made to add the Schedmodel for a AMD bulldozer target, Please note that , the model is incomplete but has some of the valuables features implemented. Request to the group or someone from AMD for the comments on the implementation. Thanks ~umesh On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Umesh Kalappa <umesh.kalappa0 at gmail.com>wrote: >

On 30.11.2011, at 08:33, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jan, > >> if I compile with dragonegg and -march=native I get this message: >> 'bdver1' is not a recognized processor for this target (ignoring processor) > > this is coming directly from LLVM which doesn't know about bulldozer yet. > >> Is there any plan to support this cpu ? > > I don't

I am trying to use dovecot. I've got a GFS2 shared volume on two servers with dovecot running on both. On one server at a time, it works. The test I am trying is to attach two mail programs (MUA) via IMAPS (Thunderbird and Evolution as it happens). I've attached one mail program to each IMAPS server. I am trying to move emails around in one program (from folder to folder), and then

I'm running beta7 on two machines, with maildir on NFS. I have lockd running on all machines. I've found that Dovecot is highly unstable with NFS when accessing a mailbox on more than one machine at the same time. Both dovecot machines have: mmap_disable = yes lock_method = fcntl NFS is version 3, exported from a third linux machine. All machines are running 2.6.9 kernel. Any ideas

Hi Dave, Can you describe which passes may benefit from this information ? My intuition is that until there are a number of passes which require this information, there are other ways to provide this information. One way would be to use Metadata. Having said that, I do share the feeling that IR-level optimization often need more target-specific information. For example, vectorizing compilers

Hi folks! It looks like Timo nailed down the NFS issues we've been seeing here in last night's CVS build. Anyone running Dovecot in a high-usage environment should check this out. Here are some relevant ChangeLog updates that seem to address the problem: 2006-05-02 11:11 Timo Sirainen <timo.sirainen at movial.fi> * src/lib-storage/index/maildir/: maildir-save.c,

For a while now we (Cray) have had some very primitive cache structure information encoded into our version of LLVM. Given the more complex memory structures introduced by Bulldozer and various accelerators, it's time to do this Right (tm). So I'm looking for some feedback on a proposed design. The goal of this work is to provide Passes with useful information such as cache sizes,

Hi Mike, Thank you for the link and my bad last mail has the old patch file. Please have look at the attached patch file herewith,which has the latest changes. i'm new to llvm testing framework and cross compilation as such ,Please can you through some lights like references etc ,Which states that how can i cross compile the llvm for Bulldozer and run the performance test against my

Dear all, I've been experiencing this problem and still can't find a solution for this. I want to have a dynamic quota for each virtual user. I've followed instruction from : http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-etch/ But still can't give what I want. But if I use userdb static, I works fluently. Below are my Dovecot

Hi Jan, > if I compile with dragonegg and -march=native I get this message: > 'bdver1' is not a recognized processor for this target (ignoring processor) this is coming directly from LLVM which doesn't know about bulldozer yet. > Is there any plan to support this cpu ? I don't know. Hopefully someone who knows something about this will comment. Ciao, Duncan. >