similar to: Dovecot and Seamonkey/Mozilla "delete attachment"

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the centos mirror: RHSA-2006:0594-02 Critical: seamonkey security update (was mozilla) Files available: seamonkey-1.0.3-0.0.1.5.EL2.c2.1.i386.rpm seamonkey-chat-1.0.3-0.0.1.5.EL2.c2.1.i386.rpm seamonkey-devel-1.0.3-0.0.1.5.EL2.c2.1.i386.rpm seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.3-0.0.1.5.EL2.c2.1.i386.rpm

All, For 4.4 mozilla is out and seamonkey is in. In the old mozilla there was no command mozilla-xremote-client. In the new seamonkey there is a command mozilla-xremote-client. Under mozilla you could do "mozilla -remote "openurl(www.cnn.com)" and it would set the current page to the url. Trying this under seamonkey does not work. however, I just found the new command

I have an XPI that I used to apply to mozilla. seamonkey is now loaded instead of mozilla. even if I do a "yum install mozilla" I still get seamonkey. How do I get mozilla. My XPI does not seem to work with seamonkey... THanks, Jerry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Does the Seamonkey (Mozilla) web browser exist for CentOS 5.4? It seems to be missing from the standard repository. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows heller at deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/

I have searched the bugzilla and seamonkey has bugs when using "-remote openurl(www.google.com)" it always opens a new window. Mozilla did not have this problem. How can I continue to use the old mozilla? Both for system updates and for new 4.4 installs. I need the -remote functionality to not open new windows. Thanks, Jerry

On 09/01/16 10:08, H wrote: > In order to run a certain software package that runs as a java applet I had to install Centos 3.8 on a 32-bit server. After installation I upgraded the installation using yum after repointing the configuration file to vault.centos.org. This worked fine, however, I still have to resolve two problems: > - I'd would like to make the EPEL repository available

In order to run a certain software package that runs as a java applet I had to install Centos 3.8 on a 32-bit server. After installation I upgraded the installation using yum after repointing the configuration file to vault.centos.org. This worked fine, however, I still have to resolve two problems: - I'd would like to make the EPEL repository available but have not been able to find if old

That is correct, not only do I want to, I need to. Thank you for your explanation of the EPEL policy. On January 8, 2016 5:43:55 PM EST, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: >On 1/8/2016 2:21 PM, H wrote: >> That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. > >you WANT to run something completely unsupported from about 10 years >ago >which

On 1/8/2016 2:21 PM, H wrote: > That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. you WANT to run something completely unsupported from about 10 years ago which apparently requires software thats known to be insecure and buggy as all heck. its 2015, not 2005, 10 years is an eternity in the computer industry. whatever this 10 year old application is you're trying

On Jan 8, 2016, at 10:03 PM, Rob Kampen <rkampen at kampensonline.com> wrote: > welcome to the real world of 2016, there are lots of bespoke systems providing real value and definitely not affordable to replace in the cut throat world of a local ISP. This is a sad truth, but it doesn?t mean that CentOS or EPEL should even *try* to support them. If you?re going to run an unsupported,

On Sun, 10 Jan 2016, H wrote: > That is correct, not only do I want to, I need to. It seems like RH 3.8 was around the time of Fedora Core 3-5 so you might be able to install packages from the Fedora archive: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/ Otherwise you could rebuild source packages from there with: rpmbuild --rebuild ... -- Ian

But I did not ask for a current version of Centos to support my usecase, did I? On January 9, 2016 1:04:33 PM EST, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: >On Jan 8, 2016, at 10:03 PM, Rob Kampen <rkampen at kampensonline.com> >wrote: >> welcome to the real world of 2016, there are lots of bespoke systems >providing real value and definitely not affordable to

Hello Dovecot List, I am a bit of a sysadmin novice and this is my first time emailing, so please let me know if I have left some critical information out. I am supporting a small office network supported primarily by linux servers. All of my users are using dovecot as a pop3 daemon on a centOS 5 box, no IMAP users. Seven users are running outlook 2003 on windows XP, two users are running

That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. On January 8, 2016 5:18:36 PM EST, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >On 09/01/16 10:08, H wrote: >> In order to run a certain software package that runs as a java applet >I had to install Centos 3.8 on a 32-bit server. After installation I >upgraded the installation using yum after repointing the

On 01/09/2016 11:43 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/8/2016 2:21 PM, H wrote: >> That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. > > you WANT to run something completely unsupported from about 10 years > ago which apparently requires software thats known to be insecure and > buggy as all heck. its 2015, not 2005, 10 years is an eternity > in the

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1084 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1084.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.s390.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1084 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1084.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.s390.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0980 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0980.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0980 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0980.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-6.el4.centos.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-6.el4.centos.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-6.el4.centos.s390.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0722 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0722.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.3.el3.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-0.3.el3.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-0.3.el3.centos3.s390.rpm