similar to: Updated v1.1 and summer plans

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Updated v1.1 and summer plans"

2007 Apr 17
1
v1.1 plans - sieve?
In the 1.1 plans (http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-April/021974.html) I don't see any mention of sieve... is this intentional? Sieve support is a priority for me... I'm going to have to see if I can get it via exim's support if dovecot's not going to add it in 1.1. Cheers, David
2007 Dec 03
0
De-duplication / Single Instance Storage - WAS: Re: Updated v1.1 and summer plans
On 12/2/2007, Timo Sirainen (tss at iki.fi) wrote: > On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 10:02 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: >> Do you have any idea as to a time frame for when you might be able >> to get to it (Single instance Storage)? Are you thinking post >> v2.0? Even 2.1 or 3.0? > Right now I just want to get v1.1 finished. The main problem with it > is that apparently in
2007 Dec 01
2
Updated v1.1 and summer plans
Timo Sirainen, on 5/21/2007 8:54 AM, said the following: <snip> > Upcoming v1.1 features, more or less implemented in this order: <snip> Hey Timo, I'm loving all of the new functionality - especially the full support for Shared mailboxes and ACLs... but... I don't see any mention of support for SiS (single-instance-storage) as discussed previously on the list, even for
2007 Apr 17
14
v1.1 plans
I think I won't do any actual releases until it's mostly feature complete. Then maybe v1.1.alpha1 or v1.1.beta1. So if you want to test it before then, use CVS or the nightly snapshots. I'm planning on keeping v1.1 almost completely compatible with v1.0. There could be some minor configuration file changes, but for most people v1.0's dovecot.conf should work with v1.1. I want to
2009 Nov 22
3
[LLVMdev] -O0 compile time speed (was: Go)
On Nov 21, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > Chris Lattner writes: >> I'm still really interested in making Clang (and thus LLVM) faster at -O0 (while still preserving debuggability of course). > > Why? I want the compiler to build things quickly in all modes, but -O0 in particular is important for a fast compile/debug/edit cycle. Are you asking why fast compilers
2009 Nov 22
0
[LLVMdev] -O0 compile time speed (was: Go)
Chris Lattner writes: > On Nov 21, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > >> Chris Lattner writes: >>> I'm still really interested in making Clang (and thus LLVM) faster >>> at -O0 (while still preserving debuggability of course). >> >> Why? > > I want the compiler to build things quickly in all modes, but -O0 in > particular is
2007 Jul 12
3
v1.1 status and benchmarks
v1.1 plans have changed a bit. I'll release v1.1.alpha1 soon and hope to have a stable v1.1 in a month or two. The rest of the features that didn't make it into v1.1 will go to v1.2. I'll write more about this when v1.1 alpha is released. I also did a bit of benchmarking. v1.1's performance improvements are looking pretty great, it seems to be twice as fast as v1.0. v1.0:
2002 Oct 07
4
Application
How should I install windows applications on clients joining a samba PDC? THX Davide Parise E-Mail: d.parise@agora.it
2018 Mar 31
0
Migrate from Tinc-VPN v1.0 to TINC-VPN v1.1
El 31 de marzo de 2018 17:58:18 CEST, Rafael Wolf <rfwolf at gmail.com> escribió: >Can you just compile the latest from the git repo on to raspian os? > > > >On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 11:21 AM Ramses <ramses.sevilla at gmail.com> wrote: > >> El 29 de marzo de 2018 23:41:24 CEST, Ramses ><ramses.sevilla at gmail.com> >> escribió: >> >Hi
2007 Aug 07
1
v1.1.alpha2 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz.sig Hopefully the next release can be v1.1.beta1. I'm not aware of any major problems and I think I'm pretty much done with new features (except for dbox). The largest changes since alpha1: * Removed THREAD indexing. It's a bit buggy and I think
2018 Oct 02
2
Help for UID THREAD and SORT optimization
Hello, we are developing a library to show last arrived messages of all threads in a folder with more than 300k messages. As per the RFC 5256, the IMAP thread command has only the option to specify the grouping criteria (REFERENCES vs ORDEREDSUBJECT). So we implemented an algorithm which gets the full UID SORT ordered by date in reverse order then gets all thread relations and then post
2007 Dec 06
3
Roadmap to future
v1.1.0 is finally getting closer, so it's time to start planning what happens after it. Below is a list of some of the larger features I'm planning on implementing. I'm not yet sure in which order, so I think it's time to ask again what features companies would be willing to pay for? Sponsoring Dovecot development gets you: - listed in Credits in www.dovecot.org - listed in
2008 Feb 16
0
v1.1.beta16 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta16.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta16.tar.gz.sig If all goes well, I'll release v1.1.rc1 in a couple of days. Now's a good time to start testing v1.1 :) Changes since beta15: - Squat is finally working and supports expunging messages from it. I've been stress testing it and can't find any problems
2018 Mar 31
0
Migrate from Tinc-VPN v1.0 to TINC-VPN v1.1
El 29 de marzo de 2018 23:41:24 CEST, Ramses <ramses.sevilla at gmail.com> escribió: >Hi everyone, > >I have installed Tinc-VPN v1.0.19-3, that is the last version that >there is in Raspbian 7, installed with the apt-get command. > >I will like know what will be the best way to migrate this version to >Tinc-VPN v1.1 > > >Regards, > >Ramses Hi everyone,
2018 Apr 01
0
Migrate from Tinc-VPN v1.0 to TINC-VPN v1.1
El 1 de abril de 2018 3:34:46 CEST, Lars Kruse <lists at sumpfralle.de> escribió: >Hello Ramses, > > >Am Sun, 01 Apr 2018 01:44:01 +0200 >schrieb Ramses <ramses.sevilla at gmail.com>: > >> [..] >> >> Correct? > >in general, this is exactly the right procedure. > > >> I have installed Raspbian 7 (Wheezy). I will have problems doing
2007 Dec 09
1
v1.1.beta11 released (Problems)
On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:48 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: > > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 20:29:49 +0200 > From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> > Subject: [Dovecot] v1.1.beta11 released > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: <1197224989.922.405.camel at hurina> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >
2007 Dec 22
0
v1.1.beta12 deliver crashes (arvids) Ditto!
On Dec 22, 2007, at 5:00 AM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: (stuff cut out) > Message: 10 > Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:12:30 +0200 > From: arvids <arvids at mpe.lv> > Subject: [Dovecot] v1.1.beta12 deliver crashes > To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> > Message-ID: <200712221112.30760.arvids at mpe.lv> > Content-Type: text/plain;
2018 Mar 31
2
Migrate from Tinc-VPN v1.0 to TINC-VPN v1.1
Can you just compile the latest from the git repo on to raspian os? On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 11:21 AM Ramses <ramses.sevilla at gmail.com> wrote: > El 29 de marzo de 2018 23:41:24 CEST, Ramses <ramses.sevilla at gmail.com> > escribió: > >Hi everyone, > > > >I have installed Tinc-VPN v1.0.19-3, that is the last version that > >there is in Raspbian 7,
2000 Mar 27
2
Problem starting SMB services
This is the error I receive when attempting to start the service. This is from /var/log/messages. Mar 27 11:41:17 portero smb: smbd startup succeeded Mar 27 11:41:17 portero smb: nmbd startup failed Mar 27 11:41:18 portero srvsvcd: execvp: No such file or directory Mar 27 11:41:18 portero smb: srvsvcd startup failed Mar 27 11:41:18 portero wkssvcd: execvp: No such file or directory Mar 27
2008 May 30
4
v1.1.rc6 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc6.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc6.tar.gz.sig This is it. The first v1.1 release that actually deserves the "release candidate" name. It contains everything I require from v1.1.0 release. There are two bugs left that I'd like to get fixed, but they won't block v1.1.0 release: *