similar to: NFS lock contention for dovecot-uidlist

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "NFS lock contention for dovecot-uidlist"

2020 Oct 23
1
dovecot-uidlist invalid data
Hello I have a problem with Invalid data System debian10 dovecot-2.2.36.4 # 2.2.36.4 (baf9232c1): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24.rc1 (debaa297) # OS: Linux 4.19.0-12-amd64 x86_64 Debian 10 Oct 23 15:57:52 dovecot6 dovecot: lmtp(33973,media4_js,2KEXD2Dhkl+1hAAAe3x6RQ): Error: Broken file /vmail/me/media4_js/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist line 6875: Invalid data: In debian9 -
2011 Jan 20
3
Dotlock dovecot-uidlist errors / NFS / High Load
As of late our four node dovecot 1.2.13 cluster has been experiencing a massive number of these dotlock errors: Created dotlock file's timestamp is different than current time (1295480202 vs 1295479784): /mail/user/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist These dotlock errors correspond with very high load averages, and eventually we have to turn off all but one server to stop them from occurring. We first
2020 Jun 23
0
problem with warnings
Hi I have a problem with warrnings in log Yesterday "big gays" change datastore and After this time i get warrnings in dovecot like: Warning: Created dotlock file's timestamp is different than current time (1592878268 vs 1592871191): /vmail/us/username/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist Before that there was no problem with warnnings I have dovecot director with 5 dovecot-nodes and storage
2006 Jun 26
0
[klibc 14/43] Remove in-kernel nfsroot code
The in-kernel nfsroot code is obsoleted by kinit. Remove it; it causes conflicts. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 161e1dc16ec1129b30b634a2a8dcbbd1937800c5 tree c30da837d746fe65d8a13ccf6f27bd381948edb4 parent 018604e070e143657abcf0cb256a1e2dda205d97 author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sat, 20 May 2006 16:24:05 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at
2006 Jun 01
2
Help! Uidlist files are gone and won't come back; imap keeps coredumping!
Folks - Some time ago as I migrated to dovecot 1.0, I ran into all sorts of problems with file locks, and I tried various solutions. Apparently, in the process, I got a bit careless and removed all my dovecot-uidlist files. They're gone. My understanding, however, is that they should come back, but this doesn't happen. I've been forced to run with index=MEMORY in 1.0 for
2005 Aug 25
2
Something other than dotlock for uidlist locking?
If I read the code correctly, only dotlocks are supported for locking of dovecot-uidlist. And I don't see any settings in the config file for it. As it turns out, dotlocks are very slow on my system, due to their implementation via hardlinks. Would it be possible to support other locking mechanisms for locking of the uidlist file? -jdb
2007 Jul 24
2
dovecot-uidlist locking
Hi all, I've a dovecot server setup and occassionally clients cannot get mails from their inbox. When I inspect the maildir for that user, there is stale dovecot-uidlist.lock file, and imap process keeps waiting for release of the lock. Is there any other method to perform locking on dovecot-uidlist instead of using dotlock mechanism? It is creating maintenance problems if I need to remove
2008 Feb 26
3
constant mailbox rebuilding with dovecot 1.0.10
I've recently upgraded to 1.0.10 in hopes that this problem would go away but no luck. I've got some users at my company with large inboxes on maildir (say 22,000 messages). Their mailboxes are hosted on nfs and dovecot is configured to do dotlocking. Still I see messages like this continually in the logs (sometimes every hour or so): server dovecot: IMAP(user): dotlock
2011 Jan 20
1
Fwd: Re: Dotlock dovecot-uidlist errors / NFS / High Load
Stan, Thanks for the reply. In our case we have actually already done most of the work you suggested to no avail. We had rebuilt two new ntp servers that sync against two stratum 1 sources, and all our nfs clients, regardless of using dovecot, sync to those two machines. You bring up the difference between bare metal and hypervisor, and we are running these machines on vmware 4.0. All the
2005 Sep 02
0
nfsstat -m equivalent
Is there an equivalent command to nfsstat -m on Centos 3.4? On solaris it reports statistics for each NFS mounted file system i.e.: /mount/point from host:/some/path Flags: vers=3,proto=tcp,sec=sys,hard,intr,link,symlink,acl,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,retrans=5,timeo=50 Attr cache: acregmin=3,acregmax=60,acdirmin=30,acdirmax=60 On a related topic, how can I make a Centos3.4 nfs server
2012 Jan 07
1
Attribute Cache flush errors on FreeBSD 8.2
I'm running dovecot 2.0.16 on FreeBSD 8.2 with the mail spool and indexes on an NFS server. Lines like the following keep appearing in syslog for access to each mailbox: Error: nfs_flush_attr_cache_fd_locked: fchown(/home/philk/Mail/Deleted) failed: Bad file descriptor This is coming from nfs-workarounds.c line 210, which tracing back seems to be coming from the call to mbox_lock on
2007 Dec 20
4
dotlock errors without using dotlock
I have a few clients that have more than one user in the same mailbox. I have my setup using fctrl for mailbox and index locking. My mail is stored on a network file system (gluster) and my indexes are stored on the local drive. I have a few issues: - My users mailboxes have issues where messages will be mixed up (you go to open a message and it gets a different message) - messages will
2005 May 22
1
[patch 11/12] Unpleasantness in linux/nfs_mount.h
There is a conflict in glibc between <linux/in.h> and <netinet/in.h>: one defines protocols with an enum, the other does the same, but adds a self-define for every enumerated value. #define IPPROTO_IP IPPROTO_IP This means the two cannot be mixed, and since loads of include files refer to <netinet/in.h>, effectively <linux/in.h> cannot be used with glibc. Since
2005 Nov 21
1
lock file 2nd attempt for help
Hi my last post got no replies so i am trying again. FC3 dovecot 1.0 stable, 1 user has a lock file using mbox under /var/spool/mail/username from the lock file the pid files are File Descriptor Type File size Inode Path Current dir Directory 4096 6426371 /home/domain/domain127 Root dir Directory 4096 2 / Program code Regular file 1212428 1229832
2018 Dec 04
3
[2.3.4] Segmentation faults
Thanks for mySql For Squat vs Solr, Solr does not reach Squat by very far in terms of results : If I setup Solr, and search (via the search in Roundbube or Evolution) for a keyword or part of the keyword, the results are complete non sense. The diference between "search in full body" and "search in fields" does not even work. Solr with Dovecot seems very early beta
2018 Dec 04
2
[2.3.4] Segmentation faults
Hi How to solve this ? So many similar segfaults Thank you On 2018-11-30 06:11, Joan Moreau wrote: > ANother (very very long) example : > > # gdb /usr/libexec/dovecot/indexer-worker core.indexer-worker.0.3a33f56105e043de802a7dfcee265a07.21017.1543533424000000 > GNU gdb (GDB) 8.2 > Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or
2018 Nov 29
3
[2.3.4] Segmentation faults
finally managed to locate the dump here the output: # gdb /usr/libexec/dovecot/auth /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.auth.0.3a33f56105e043de802a7dfcee265a07.28130.1543516118000000 GNU gdb (GDB) 8.2 Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
2018 Dec 04
2
[2.3.4] Segmentation faults
> On December 4, 2018 at 8:18 AM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > We don't consider it as "very early beta". We consider it production ready. It is bit more work to set up though. FWIW, Squat has been deprecated since 2.0, so none of this should come as a surprise. https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS > Aki > > > On 04 December
2008 Feb 26
3
nfs locking issues...
I'm running Dovecot 1.1 RC1. I believe I've done all the due diligence for making things working correctly over nfs. But I run into locking issues if I run over nfs. procmail is doing the delivery over nfs. uw-imap was ruining over nfs. dovecot is fine if its on the nfs server (i.e. it has local access to the disk, no nfs) I run into lock deadlocks if I run dovecot over nfs Users
2005 Dec 05
2
dotlock & NFS
Hello, is dotlock supposed to work with NFS? I noticed that the default-locking method causes problems even with nfslockd started. Regards Marten