Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "dovecot deliver tries to setuid but why?"
2006 Dec 03
1
Deliver Root Setuid
Hi,
I just configured my Postfix installation to deliver via Dovecot LDA. But
because I use separate uids for virtual domains I had to set deliver to be
setuid root. Altough I find this as frequent answer to this problem with
deliver LDA I am not a 100% sure - basically because I try to avoid root
setuids as much as I can.
What should be better solution - to have all mailboxes with one owner or
2010 Dec 06
1
waldtest and nested models - poolability (parameter stability)
Dear All,
I'm trying to use waldtest to test poolability (parameter stability) between
two logistic regressions. Because I need to use robust standard errors
(using sandwich), I cannot use anova. anova has no problems running the
test, but waldtest does, indipendently of specifying vcov or not. waldtest
does not appear to see that my models are nested. H0 in my case is the the
vector of
2009 Oct 27
1
SetUID check problem
Running dovecot 1.2.4 on FreeBSD using Postfix. Everything works fine
normally, but deliver is executable by world.
This is not normally a problem, as I don't run deliver SetUID root.
But for whatever reason, when deliver is called by something that IS
SetUID root I get the following error:
/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver must not be both world-executable
and setuid-root. This
2016 Feb 04
1
libvirt.so is not safe to use from setuid programs
Hi,
When trying to connect the HyperVisor from a binary having setuid bit set , then I got following error:
Unable to perform virConnectOpenReadOnly function error(internal error: libvirt.so is not safe to use from setuid programs)
My test software config is the following :
-rwsr-xr-x. 1 root root 3374956 Feb 4 13:45 test
As this test software needs S bit to be able to access O.S.
2018 Jul 06
2
Does anyone use UsePrivilegedPort=yes or setuid ssh(1) ?
Hi.
Does anyone use UsePrivilegedPort or have ssh(1) setuid, and if so for
what use case?
ssh(1) has had code in it to support installing setuid root since
approximately forever, however OpenBSD has not shipped it in that
configuration since 2002 (and I suspect these days no vendor does).
As far as I can tell, all of the reasons for this no longer apply:
- setuid root was needed to bind to a
2010 Apr 07
3
how to mount shares as a user without mount.cifs setuid
I'm running Debian/Squeeze on an AMD64 system. For some reason they have
recently stopped shipping mount.cifs with the setuid bit set. Now it
appears that they have changed the internal settings to prevent it from
running setuid. This means that I can't define the share in fstab with
"user" and connect from my Linux user account. Mounting smb/cifs shares
seems to be blocked
2008 Jan 07
2
do not lose mail when dovecot is dead
Hi!
Recently I've experienced problems with dovecot. Dovecot died silently,
what means is that there are no core files, nor any indication in the
log files, just the "kevent(): Invalid argument" messages. Dovecot just
died, so deliver could not connect to the auth-master socket, which
means that messages couldn't been delivered. The problem is that
postfix thought that the
2007 Apr 24
2
chmod sftp command and setgid/setuid bit
Hi OpenSSH developers,
I'm using OpenSSH on a daily basis and I'm very pleased
with the work you've done.
I am contributing to some Open Source software hosted at Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/tsp
and we recently hit some sftp unexpected behavior:
https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?105838
when using chmod sftp client command
it appears that setuid / setgid bits are
2011 Apr 21
7
[Bug 1893] New: change ssh-keisign to setgid from setuid
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1893
Summary: change ssh-keisign to setgid from setuid
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.8p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Miscellaneous
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2007 Nov 16
1
Problem running a setuid Perl script on CentOS 4.5
I'm trying to create a setuid Perl script (yes, I am aware about the
security implications), but am getting this error:
% cat testsetuid.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -UT
print "My real user id is $< but my effective user id is $>\n";
exit(0);
% ./testsetuid.pl
Can't do setuid (cannot exec sperl)
I am using the stock Perl that came with CentOS 4.5. The problem I
2004 Feb 27
1
setuid rsync
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I trying to create an automated backup from one machine to the other via
SSH. I have setup ssh keys and so on, so everything is pretty much
working. The only thing is, I am trying to perserve file ownership. I
don't want to use ssh keys w/o a password (for obvious reasons), so I
what I did was this:
I setup a chrooted account called
2008 Apr 14
1
install perl with setuid emulation
Dear All,
i would like to know how to install perl with setuid emulation since the
default centos 5 wont install with the setuid emulation
apprecite your help
regards
simon
--
Network ADMIN:
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
2002 Jun 11
4
ssh setuid changes.
Ok, I'm doing a heads up here.
I just applied:
- markus at cvs.openbsd.org 2002/06/11 04:14:26
[ssh.c sshconnect.c sshconnect.h]
no longer use uidswap.[ch] from the ssh client
run less code with euid==0 if ssh is installed setuid root
just switch the euid, don't switch the complete set of groups
(this is only needed by sshd). ok provos@
A few comments about
2019 May 24
2
imap userdb Fatal setuid errors
I?m trying to configure dovecot lmtp in multi-user mode. My error logs are filled with messages saying that an imap process cannot do a setuid to another user:
> May 21 22:28:46 imap(pid 17441 user myuser): Fatal: setuid(512(myuser) from userdb lookup) failed with euid=501(adminuser): Operation not permitted (This binary should probably be called with process user set to 512(myuser) instead of
2006 Oct 21
2
any idea why the mail downloading is slow?
Hi!
I'm using rc10, but had this problem with previous releases too. Not
sure if this is a dovecot problem, but I can not think of anything
else. The mail downloading with pop3 is ~very slow, approx. 20 Kbyte /
sec. no matter how many mails I've got in my mailbox, or how big are
the mails. My ISP provides me a dedicated 100mbit line, and everything
else works as fast as expected eg.
2007 Nov 02
1
Postfix and Dovecot Deliver LDA
Hi all,
Having problems moving from postfix/dovecot/mysq/maildrop existing
intall to dovecot LDA
dovecot -n
# 1.0.5: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
log_path: /var/log/dovecot.log
log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S
protocols: imap pop3
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable(default): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap-login
login_executable(imap): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap-login
login_executable(pop3):
2005 Jul 06
1
setuid/setgid bits
version: rsync v2.6.1 (+ a minor, unrelated patch).
I'm rsyncing files (not as root) and am happy (indeed, for what I
want, delighted) that the files at the target side end up owned by the
account doing the rsync.
However, I've found that if I have a setuid/setgid file on the source
side, the target file ends up setuid/setgid too (but under a different
id!). This happens whether
2013 Oct 14
2
setuid or other ideas
Everyone,
I am working on a Centos 5.9 system. I have an need to be able to
activate a piece of software from /etc/smrsh that is activated when
sendmail delivers the e-mail to this piece of software. I would like
this piece of software to take on the user and group identities that are
different than 'mail' which is what happens now. I want to use a user
and group that is not root), so
2005 Nov 27
1
useradd setuid bit
Hi!
I've a little question:
When the samba create machine account it's uid is 0 (root) or anything
else? I've created a samba jail, and I want to know the useradd binary
should be setuid or not.
Thanks:
--
Szalai ?kos <szalakos@andrews.hu>
Andrews IT Engineering Kft
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type:
2007 Jul 12
1
Using setuid on smbd
Hello list,
I wonder if it is a really bad idea to setuid bit on samba daemons to
make them start with root privileges?
I need it in an embedded systems where the daemons are started by a
non root user and I don't have access to sudo etc and we all know
that smbd should run under root.
Cheers,
henke