similar to: dovecot deliver tries to setuid but why?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "dovecot deliver tries to setuid but why?"

2006 Dec 03
1
Deliver Root Setuid
Hi, I just configured my Postfix installation to deliver via Dovecot LDA. But because I use separate uids for virtual domains I had to set deliver to be setuid root. Altough I find this as frequent answer to this problem with deliver LDA I am not a 100% sure - basically because I try to avoid root setuids as much as I can. What should be better solution - to have all mailboxes with one owner or
2010 Dec 06
1
waldtest and nested models - poolability (parameter stability)
Dear All, I'm trying to use waldtest to test poolability (parameter stability) between two logistic regressions. Because I need to use robust standard errors (using sandwich), I cannot use anova. anova has no problems running the test, but waldtest does, indipendently of specifying vcov or not. waldtest does not appear to see that my models are nested. H0 in my case is the the vector of
2009 Oct 27
1
SetUID check problem
Running dovecot 1.2.4 on FreeBSD using Postfix. Everything works fine normally, but deliver is executable by world. This is not normally a problem, as I don't run deliver SetUID root. But for whatever reason, when deliver is called by something that IS SetUID root I get the following error: /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver must not be both world-executable and setuid-root. This
2016 Feb 04
1
libvirt.so is not safe to use from setuid programs
Hi, When trying to connect the HyperVisor from a binary having setuid bit set , then I got following error: Unable to perform virConnectOpenReadOnly function error(internal error: libvirt.so is not safe to use from setuid programs) My test software config is the following : -rwsr-xr-x. 1 root root 3374956 Feb 4 13:45 test As this test software needs S bit to be able to access O.S.
2018 Jul 06
2
Does anyone use UsePrivilegedPort=yes or setuid ssh(1) ?
Hi. Does anyone use UsePrivilegedPort or have ssh(1) setuid, and if so for what use case? ssh(1) has had code in it to support installing setuid root since approximately forever, however OpenBSD has not shipped it in that configuration since 2002 (and I suspect these days no vendor does). As far as I can tell, all of the reasons for this no longer apply: - setuid root was needed to bind to a
2010 Apr 07
3
how to mount shares as a user without mount.cifs setuid
I'm running Debian/Squeeze on an AMD64 system. For some reason they have recently stopped shipping mount.cifs with the setuid bit set. Now it appears that they have changed the internal settings to prevent it from running setuid. This means that I can't define the share in fstab with "user" and connect from my Linux user account. Mounting smb/cifs shares seems to be blocked
2008 Jan 07
2
do not lose mail when dovecot is dead
Hi! Recently I've experienced problems with dovecot. Dovecot died silently, what means is that there are no core files, nor any indication in the log files, just the "kevent(): Invalid argument" messages. Dovecot just died, so deliver could not connect to the auth-master socket, which means that messages couldn't been delivered. The problem is that postfix thought that the
2007 Apr 24
2
chmod sftp command and setgid/setuid bit
Hi OpenSSH developers, I'm using OpenSSH on a daily basis and I'm very pleased with the work you've done. I am contributing to some Open Source software hosted at Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/tsp and we recently hit some sftp unexpected behavior: https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?105838 when using chmod sftp client command it appears that setuid / setgid bits are
2011 Apr 21
7
[Bug 1893] New: change ssh-keisign to setgid from setuid
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1893 Summary: change ssh-keisign to setgid from setuid Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2007 Nov 16
1
Problem running a setuid Perl script on CentOS 4.5
I'm trying to create a setuid Perl script (yes, I am aware about the security implications), but am getting this error: % cat testsetuid.pl #!/usr/bin/perl -UT print "My real user id is $< but my effective user id is $>\n"; exit(0); % ./testsetuid.pl Can't do setuid (cannot exec sperl) I am using the stock Perl that came with CentOS 4.5. The problem I
2004 Feb 27
1
setuid rsync
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I trying to create an automated backup from one machine to the other via SSH. I have setup ssh keys and so on, so everything is pretty much working. The only thing is, I am trying to perserve file ownership. I don't want to use ssh keys w/o a password (for obvious reasons), so I what I did was this: I setup a chrooted account called
2008 Apr 14
1
install perl with setuid emulation
Dear All, i would like to know how to install perl with setuid emulation since the default centos 5 wont install with the setuid emulation apprecite your help regards simon -- Network ADMIN: -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
2002 Jun 11
4
ssh setuid changes.
Ok, I'm doing a heads up here. I just applied: - markus at cvs.openbsd.org 2002/06/11 04:14:26 [ssh.c sshconnect.c sshconnect.h] no longer use uidswap.[ch] from the ssh client run less code with euid==0 if ssh is installed setuid root just switch the euid, don't switch the complete set of groups (this is only needed by sshd). ok provos@ A few comments about
2019 May 24
2
imap userdb Fatal setuid errors
I?m trying to configure dovecot lmtp in multi-user mode. My error logs are filled with messages saying that an imap process cannot do a setuid to another user: > May 21 22:28:46 imap(pid 17441 user myuser): Fatal: setuid(512(myuser) from userdb lookup) failed with euid=501(adminuser): Operation not permitted (This binary should probably be called with process user set to 512(myuser) instead of
2006 Oct 21
2
any idea why the mail downloading is slow?
Hi! I'm using rc10, but had this problem with previous releases too. Not sure if this is a dovecot problem, but I can not think of anything else. The mail downloading with pop3 is ~very slow, approx. 20 Kbyte / sec. no matter how many mails I've got in my mailbox, or how big are the mails. My ISP provides me a dedicated 100mbit line, and everything else works as fast as expected eg.
2007 Nov 02
1
Postfix and Dovecot Deliver LDA
Hi all, Having problems moving from postfix/dovecot/mysq/maildrop existing intall to dovecot LDA dovecot -n # 1.0.5: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf log_path: /var/log/dovecot.log log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S protocols: imap pop3 login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3):
2005 Jul 06
1
setuid/setgid bits
version: rsync v2.6.1 (+ a minor, unrelated patch). I'm rsyncing files (not as root) and am happy (indeed, for what I want, delighted) that the files at the target side end up owned by the account doing the rsync. However, I've found that if I have a setuid/setgid file on the source side, the target file ends up setuid/setgid too (but under a different id!). This happens whether
2013 Oct 14
2
setuid or other ideas
Everyone, I am working on a Centos 5.9 system. I have an need to be able to activate a piece of software from /etc/smrsh that is activated when sendmail delivers the e-mail to this piece of software. I would like this piece of software to take on the user and group identities that are different than 'mail' which is what happens now. I want to use a user and group that is not root), so
2005 Nov 27
1
useradd setuid bit
Hi! I've a little question: When the samba create machine account it's uid is 0 (root) or anything else? I've created a samba jail, and I want to know the useradd binary should be setuid or not. Thanks: -- Szalai ?kos <szalakos@andrews.hu> Andrews IT Engineering Kft -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:
2007 Jul 12
1
Using setuid on smbd
Hello list, I wonder if it is a really bad idea to setuid bit on samba daemons to make them start with root privileges? I need it in an embedded systems where the daemons are started by a non root user and I don't have access to sudo etc and we all know that smbd should run under root. Cheers, henke