similar to: Login to LDAP from new version FortiClientEMS

Le Fri, 4 Oct 2024 09:27:12 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> ?crivait: > > > > OK, I'll try first the 4.17 version from the backports, and if it's > > not enough I'll upgrade to 4.20. > > I would upgrade to bookworm with Samba from backports, but its your > domain ;-) Well I've upgraded up to 4.20, but no dice :( No

Hi Philip, Thank you very much for your comments. I think I’ve discovered a root cause. The problem was in linking bit code archive files with the module. At some point, std::set<Module*> is used and iterated over. I believe this was the reason why e.g. It worked consistently with ASLR turned off and produced non-deterministic output otherwise. I changed that bit to use vector instead and

Hi Philip, I would like to ask a follow-up question about code generation. Do you know if is expected that if we take the same bit code modules and link them together in the same order (programatically), but on different machines (assuming the same version of LLVM and roughly the same OS), the output may differ with respect to order of function definitions inside module? Thank you very much in

On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:11:37 +0200 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > Le Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:35:04 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> ?crivait: > > > > Yes, I mean Windows 11 or WIndows Server 2022 machines that are > > > registered into the AD. A Win11 PC which isn't AD-connected (but > > > in the same

Hello, I have a weird issue with rsync randomly marking some files as having a different checksum (see sample outputs below - run one after another). You would think it is some kind of corruption / io problem with the files but it doesn't seem so - I have copied files around, changes source to different machines, counted md5s manually 100s of times - always the same. All files except

> I am not a regular samba developer, but I wanted to have psexec > equivalent, so I wrote it, it works but still need some development. > I do not know if patches of such sizes (about 30k) are welcome on > this list so I've put it on web page, with some description: > http://eol.ovh.org/winexe/ > Comments welcome. Hi, this is really great, you can get Windows command

There is a reason most NMS systems used SNMP in the past and REST apis past 7+ years. They don't use CLIs except toy Expect type scripts.. Not just security but better error handling and more. Good luck learning! On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> wrote: > SNMP is mainly used for monitoring, not _server_ automation. > > Also, it's

SNMP is mainly used for monitoring, not _server_ automation. Also, it's inherently insecure for anything else - only SNMPv3 offers any kind of encryption, and it's DES - 56 bit only, and you can easily brute-force it on an average computer. If you could provide some serious articles about why is CLI insecure, I'd be interested to read. Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com On

Al like any open-source or free sofware you need to put the leg work into what you want it to be. My company is actually creating something using TINC and we believe in it. If successful we'll be giving back to TINC monetarily in a big way to make TINC even better so if TINC isn't for you keep an eye on further developments in the future. Thanks, Rafael On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:03

automation refers to day to day vpn management from non-IT layman... not a geek running shell/ansible scrpits. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 8:48 AM, al so <volkswak at gmail.com> wrote: > Just search online why in general that is insecure via CLI vs programmatic > for first class automation.. there is a reason why snmp, rest, ... exist. > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Tomasz

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:19:02PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 12:04 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 07:49:39PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 7:03 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 02:41:54PM

On 2016-06-01 20:07, Kelly Lesperance wrote: > Software RAID 10. Servers are HP DL380 Gen 8s, with 12x4 TB 7200 RPM drives. > > On 2016-06-01, 3:52 PM, "centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of m.roth at 5-cent.us" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > >Kelly Lesperance wrote: > >> I did some additional testing - I

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:07 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com> wrote: > > On 2020-08-19 13:49, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 1:51 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Tomasz, > >> > >> On 2020-08-19 12:16, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >>> Hi Christoph, > >>> >

Thank you Tomasz! The quota per user worked fine now... The problem was that in dovecot.conf I had these lines: userdb static { args = uid=5000 gid=5000 home=/home/vmail/%d/%n allow_all_users=yes } And I just changed to: userdb sql { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf } Now it's working... bye! On Wed, 28 May 2008 21:08:51 +0200, Tomasz Suchodolski <suchodolski.tomasz at

You've mentioned security issues in your previous email, but now you're hopping to management issues. Have you tried Ansible, Chef or Puppet for automation? It works well for hundreds of servers, different services and not just one kind of VPN. Tomasz Chmielewski https://lxadm.com On 2018-03-29 16:10, al so wrote: > Programmatic management with first class APIs is preferred for

Just search online why in general that is insecure via CLI vs programmatic for first class automation.. there is a reason why snmp, rest, ... exist. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> wrote: > You've mentioned security issues in your previous email, but now you're > hopping to management issues. > > Have you tried Ansible, Chef or

This is a late reply to a thread of Tomasz Chmielewsk http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-October/013878.html He asked if some workaround existed for rename of big files. I've made a script (python needed on both sides) that links the guessed files in the right directory and uses the --fuzzy feature of rsync. It is used to mirror a 100Gb archive where files are often renamed. Maybe

Type of tx_ready callback got changed to int to faciliate error condition, but the ARM serial drivers were not modified thus breaking the compilation. Reported-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Wroblewski <tomasz.wroblewski@citrix.com> --- xen/drivers/char/exynos4210-uart.c | 2 +- xen/drivers/char/omap-uart.c | 2 +-

On 2017-02-21 16:39, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > tshark shows "TCP Spurious Retransmission" for cases where curl is not > able to fetch any data. > > > Both tinc servers are running Ubuntu 16.04 (64 bit) with tinc 1.0.26. > > DC1 is Europe (Hetzner); DC2 is in USA (Amazon AWS). > > > > What's interesting, I don't have these timeouts when I

Hi, dovecot's message parser enters an endless loop when fed with certain multipart messages with stray CR characters. parse_next_body_to_boundary() assumes the '\r' might be the beginning of a boundary line, reducing the block size by one: src/lib-mail/message-parser.c: 404 /* no linefeeds in this block. we can just skip it. */ 405 ret = 0; 406