similar to: my debian/ubuntu samba packages: update to samba-ad-dc split

Thanks for your work, Michael!!! On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 8:04?AM Michael Tokarev via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi! > > A while back, with 4.20.1+dfsg-2 version (26 May 2024), > I split AD-DC functionality from samba package to a separate > samba-ad-dc package. Adding a NEWS entry for this, which > suggests to install samba-ad-dc package separately for

Hi Michael, thanks for your effort from me, too... By the way, have you planned to get the Bookworm backports up to 4.21.x? Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Elias Pereira via samba schrieb am 26.10.2024 um 13:30: > Thanks for your work, Michael!!! > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 8:04?AM Michael Tokarev via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi!

On 26.10.2024 16:37, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for your effort from me, too... Thank you for the support as well, it makes me feel excellent :) > By the way, have you planned to get the Bookworm backports up to 4.21.x? Yes, it is waiting for current 4.21.1+dfsg-2 to migrate to testing (with the fixes mentioned in this thread), and I'll push it to

06.11.2024 12:50, spindles seven via samba wrote: > Hi > I tried to update a member server's samba version from 4.20.5 to 4.21.1 using Bookworm-backports and get the following error: > > roy at moggy:~$ sudo apt upgrade > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Reading state information... Done > Calculating upgrade... Done > Some packages

Hi! I just uploaded binaries of samba versions 4.19.7-1 and 4.20.1-5 for ubuntu and debian to the usual location, http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ . There are a few changes in there. First, I changed debian release suffix to be like: 4.20.1+dfsg-5~mjt-deb11 4.20.1+dfsg-5~mjt-ubt24 This should not change anything, just make it easier to track if neded, hopefully. And for 4.20

Hello mjt, I can only speak for myself: For bigger upgrades (e. g. samba 4.19 -> 4.20) Im manually updating a few servers and check if everything works. For smaller updates (e. g. 4.20.1 -> 4.20.2) Im using saltstack to automate updating the servers. It suppresses these messages and this is fine in 99% of all cases because a minor update is not supposed to change much (e. g. split a

Hi I tried to update a member server's samba version from 4.20.5 to 4.21.1 using Bookworm-backports and get the following error: roy at moggy:~$ sudo apt upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if

04.07.2024 21:27, Paul Leiber via samba wrote: > Dear Samba list, > > I have a Samba instance running as an ad-dc on debian bullseye. Some time ago, I changed the standard installation to backports with > > apt -t bullseye-backports install samba > > After a recent update, samba-ad-dc service didn't start anymore. The journal gave the following hint: > > Jul 04

[Not including ellerhold.de address since the MXes in question does not accept connections form my part of the world] 05.07.2024 09:58, Matthias K?hne | Ellerhold Aktiengesellschaft via samba wrote: > Hello mjt, > > I can only speak for myself: > > For bigger upgrades (e. g. samba 4.19 -> 4.20) Im manually updating a > few servers and check if everything works. > >

Hi! I've uploaded samba packages for debian & ubuntu in my repository, to include the fix for recent login/trust issue with 07/2023 windows updates. 4.16 packages will also be available later today (build is in progress now). http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ JFYI. Thanks, /mjt

Replying here as well, since this is a frequent question. I uploaded the updated samba packages to the official debian archives in parallel with updating my repository - exactly the same source packages as are used to build samba for my repository. 4.18 should already be available on sid/unstable, I think. In trixie/testing it will migrate within 5 days if nothing other breaks. Updated bookworm

First, thanks so much for doing this. I used Louis's packages previously and was in a quandary about what to do when those stopped getting updates. Having you fill that gap has been super nice. Thanks! ? Second. I'm on Ubuntu (22.04) I'm currently using your MJT repo. ? I note you list official debian repos that are part of the official debian system... And that would perhaps be better

On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 12:47 +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Thanks for your work on xen packages, I have some question about 4.5 > packages: > I saw a debian/rules that disable blktap2 but > debian/patches/tools-blktap2-prefix.diff is still present and used in > series, if blktap2 is now disable I think is nomore needed. Yes, this can probably go. > I saw also many other patches

Greetings all, I'm trying to create a CentOS 4.4 kickstart CD (not a network install), duplicating what I've done for Fedora Core 3. I am having a cirular dependency for initscripts, which causes initscripts not to be installed (no /etc/inittab when the boot gets to INIT) The cascade is: initscripts-7.39.25.EL-1.centos4 requires /sbin/nash /sbin/nash is in mkinitrd-4.2.1.8-1

We just made the updated packages available in the official debian bookworm archives, see https://lists.debian.org/debian-stable-announce/2023/07/msg00000.html (yes, it is exactly the same package as has been available from my repository, just built within debian infrastructure instead of my local). Thanks, /mjt

Dear Samba list, I have a Samba instance running as an ad-dc on debian bullseye. Some time ago, I changed the standard installation to backports with apt -t bullseye-backports install samba After a recent update, samba-ad-dc service didn't start anymore. The journal gave the following hint: Jul 04 20:05:37 xxx (samba)[5864]: samba-ad-dc.service: Failed at step EXEC spawning

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:50:11 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > on the problematic DC "systemctl status" doesn't even show > "samba-ad-dc". > > Although: > > # systemctl status samba-ad-dc.service > ? samba-ad-dc.service - LSB: Samba daemons for the AD DC > Loaded: loaded

Michael, Maybe I can answer why so few are seeing the NEWS entries you created.? I checked all my Debian systems, and only one has apt-listchanges installed.? The systems were all done via a netinstall .iso.? I don't recall installing apt-listchanges on the one system, but I must have somewhere in time.? So, for any other individuals who installed the OS as I did, there is no NEWS

Hi, When I initially boot my system, it fails to bring up the network. Once booted, if I run "systemctl restart network.service", or even stop, wait a while, then start, it starts up fine and all is well. I'm running Fedora 19 (updated). I followed the instructions on this page to set up a bridged network: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking I note however that I did *not*

Hi, I have recently installed NUT 2.7.3.1 on a freshly installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (64-bit) system, connected via USB cable to APC Smart-UPS 1500 (SMT model). I am trying to make this configuration work for automatic shutdown/restart but it seems that it completely ignores /etc/killpower presence. I know the APC SMT models are problematic but it looks like I could not even make the simplest