similar to: Migrating subscription lists

There are three applications that have their mitts on files on my mail server, which is running AIXV5.3 and UWIMAP and mbox format. The mail folders and INBOXES are native to that machine, but also are NFS exported to a login server and a mailing list server. All three machines are running the lockd daemon. Everybody wants to lock differently 1) procmail (delivering for sendmail), which

I have Dovecot 1.0 in trial use by the IT staff, and have some locking questions Background, the mail server runs procmail, sendmail and NFS exports the user homedir and mailbox to a) a login shell host and b) a mailing list services host. It runs UWIMAP on the usual ports and dovecot on a arbitrary port number. Because of concern with NFS and file access contention. I have the following

It never hurts to ask...... I am bringing up DC on my production mailserver (which runs UWIMAP for production IMAP service) to learn and test it, much as I did when I introduced SSL protected IMAP, using an unpublicized non-standard port. The folder and mailbox location and format will remain the same. Questions: 1) Will DC be building indices for everything or just for the userid that I use

The CFO of our college, a most formidable man, had decided to go Blackberry and Something Functional Must Be Done. We've had some users who we've not supported (and things got better for them when we switched from UWIMAP to Dovecot). BB, of course, has their half-baked sorta-IMAP-compliant client (and we do NOT want the BB Enterprise Server) that persistently keeps grabbing the

I guess the alert function is not part of the spec, because it appears to be unimplemented in Dovecot, even though most clients implement it. Timo, I would hope this would be easy to implement, and it's functionality that will be valuable to every installation. Here's why. America recently had the tragedy of a shooting rampage on a large university campus (yes, America should do

My production imap is currently UWIMAP with mbox.. One of the problems commonly observed is mailbox lock loss, which happens when: a) a VIP has multiple secretaries accessing a single mailbox (actually, they are professional enough to have figured the realities of conflicting access and rarely have a problem), b) somebody leaving their machine on at home and coming in and firing up their work

Don't know if anyone else uses Berkeley derived filesystem quota, but IBM's AIX does. A little over a week after migrating from UWIMAP to DC (with mbox format unchanged) everything is clean except for this one problem: When users go over quota, when they login the next time, the folder list is blank. You can imagine the panicked calls to the Helpdesk. If their quotas are raised or

I've been testing my user community's IMAP clients when I try to login and then transfer a big message from the inbox into a folder in an overquota folder directory. I am using native filesystem quotaing in AIXV5.3 with UWIMAP and comparing my results with what I see with Dovecot 1.0.0. (My Dovecot built without any plugins or quota extensions) Everything matches/works except for Mac

I am bringing more people onto Dovecot...and am beginning to see syslog error messages I've never seen before...what are they/are they critical? 1 =========================== > Jun 12 09:53:21 mercury mail:err|error dovecot: IMAP(gregory): Corrupted index c > ache file /var/dcndx/gregory/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.cache: indexid changed This has the same date stamp as the user's

Hello, we are currently using sendmail, procmail, uwimap and qpopper. We are planing to replace uwimap and qpopper with dovecot. Which seems to be a very good idea :-) But: Sendmail and Procmail will not be replaced. Now I've realized that deliver rewrites existing "From <....> ..." header lines to ">From <...> ..." and adds it's own "From

I would expect this means the end of UWIMAP....which probably leaves DC as open-source IMAP of choice. There were 66 people doing IMAP and Pine/Alpine development that were laid off at UWash due to funding cuts; Mark Crispin, one of the fathers of IMAP, was among those laid off. From the keyboard of: James Morris Lead Engineer, UW Technology University of Washington

<permit me my perhaps foolish preference...an explanation> I run mail service for a small college. I've long joked that if someone stole the mail server, the phone would ring before the alarm (which has a 1 minute delay) did, that the user base expected 25x8x367 coverage. Making updates/upgrades to the mail server feels like a tightrope walk with no net. I always appreciated

Thunderbird (2.0) is all of a sudden checking mail server capabilities and keep posting a popup saying: "Mail Server imap.bard.edu is not an IMAP4 mail server". To the best of my knowledge, neither Tbird nor DC have been updated, though the DC imap host was rebooted today 3 hours ago. Any info on what this is about? DC is currently serving out of a special port and in evaluation

Hi, I have a IR file generated by Clang: ; ModuleID = 'test_load_lib.c' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-f80:128:128-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32-n8:16:32-S32" target triple = "i686-pc-mingw32" declare i32 @a_outside_func(i32) define i32 @test_func() { entry: %call = call i32

dominic adair-jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:14 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >> dominic adair-jones wrote: >>> going to run journalctl this evening when i get in and relay any errors >>> i see. >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 22:45 +0000,

Hi, I have only recently become aware of Dovecot and gave it a try. The previous 0.99.9.1 version didn't work well for me (OpenSSL), I dropped it, but 0.99.10 has come just in time (saw it on freshmeat) and I thought I'd give it another try if it promised SSL fixes, and it's sorta working for me (i. e. it works with mutt, Mozilla, sylpheed, but not cone -- but cone is beta and has SSL

If anyone's interested, especially client developers. It's been a bit quiet there after the initial rush. Begin forwarded message: > From: Randall Gellens <randy at qualcomm.com> > Date: August 1, 2008 5:08:39 AM EDT > To: ietf-imapext at imc.org, morg at ietf.org > Subject: [MORG] IMAP5 List > > At the MORG BOF, a discussion as to if the proposed IMAP

Hi, today I've finished migration from uw-imap daemons to shiny and fast dovecot. With thanks of dovecot my mail server load average drops by factor of ten even with ancient unix mailboxes. ;-) So, the only thing I've discovered is what POP3 uidls are different than ones used in the uw-imap. Luckily, the difference are only in the format string used in uidl response. So, I've

Hello I quite thank you for your advice,but I have to tell that it made no difference too calling "LLVMAddGlobalMapping(ee,LLVMGetNamedFunction(m,"_a_outside_func"),(void*)(&a_outside_func));". 2014-04-04 16:10 GMT+08:00 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>: > Hello > > While there is a symbol in the object file, there is nothing like this >

I don't have an opinion on the URL shorteners, but how about the original question? Redirection can be extremely useful in general. Shortening URLs is only one of its possible applications. FWIW, CRAN uses (303) redirect itself, e.g., https://cran.r-project.org/package=MASS is redirected to https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS/index.html Should these "canonical" CRAN links be