similar to: Syntax checker issues

Greetings - Does CRAN or someone similar make a splint / lint-like syntax checker for R? I realize that both ESS and the debug package and similar tools have debugging and error analysis features, but those appear to require running the code through the R buffer. I'd like something that did basic syntax and object-name verification for code that was to run in batch, as a precursor to

For a change, I am going to try and check the checksum before burning the CDs.... My burner is on a Win2000 box, and I have all 6 of the Centos 5 ISO images there already. So I grab a checker from: http://www.diamondcs.com.au/freeutilities/md5.php And checking the ISO image files with this program, I get different numbers than in the MD5 hash txt file. Can anyone point me to a

Hello, This is updated version of nodatacow patch. To check whether a given file extent is referenced by multiple snapshots, the checker walks down the fs tree through dead root and checks all tree blocks in the path. We can easily detect whether a given tree block is directly referenced by other snapshot. We can also detect any indirect reference from other snapshot by checking

Hi there, I''m currently building a membership application and I want to be able to select, not just all the memberships, but the most current membership from the database on a per user basis. I have linked the tables as shown:- class Membership < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :payment belongs_to :person end class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :memberships

I'm having trouble finding any documentation of the sanitizers, especially the leak checker -- apparently because of the move from code.google.com to github. Every doc has a link for "more information" which goes to code.google.com which just redirects to github and points to a placeholder doc that says lots of links are broken. I haven't found the docs using any google-fu or

hi, I want to know just enter a string value entering a numeric value is make with the function scan () or scan (nmax = ..) but it does not work for string my goal is to enter three string: name and surname and date of birth I try with this code but it shows me errors print ("enter the name") name <- scan (nmax = 1) print ("enter the first name") firstName <- scan

I have a series of checkboxes in a form generated as follows: <% for user in @active_users %> <p><%= user.firstname + " " + user.surname%> <%= check_box ''assigned_tasks'', ''user_id'', {:index => user.id}, user.id, nil %></p> <% end %> I''d like to have one of them selected when user.id is equal to the

I've recently played with the GCC implementation of pointer checker on a real hardware, my recent impressions are here: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerIntelMemoryProtectionExtensions (there is also some old pre-hardware content). In short, I totally agree with what David says above: MPX is a disaster. (Usual disclaimer: my opinion here is too biased) I am glad

Hi, I am sharing the proposal [0] which gives a brief introduction for the implementation of the LLVM DI Checker utility. On a very high level, it is a pair of LLVM (IR) Passes that check the preservation of the original debug info in the optimizations. There are options controlling the passes, that could be invoked from ``clang`` as well as from ``opt`` level. By testing the utility on the

> First, is MPX hardware available now? I wouldn't mind getting my hands on > one. It is available at least in the mobile versions of the recent Intel Skylake CPUs. I am currently playing with Alienware 15 R2 with the following CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6820HK. Interestingly, my preliminary experiments indicate that adding MPX bounds checking via Pointer Checker in gcc is usually

This question likely has a 1 line answer, I'm just not seeing it. (2, 3, or 10 lines is fine too.) For a vector I can do group <- match(x, unqiue(x)) to get a vector that labels each element of x. What is an equivalent if x is a data frame? The result does not have to be fast: the data set will have < 100 elements. Since this is inside the survival package, and that package is on

Hi Ted, Doug said you might have a clang-based checker that would detect when people allocate memory with a BumpPtrAllocator and then construct a class into it that needs destruction. In killing valgrind-found memory leaks in LLVM, I've found several instances of this mistake. They often involve SmallVectors, which only show up as leaks in valgrind if they happen to overflow their static

Smatch complains that "rc" can be uninitialized if we hit the "break;" statement on the first iteration through the loop. I suspect that this can't happen in real life, but returning a zero literal is cleaner and silence the static checker warning. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

Does anyone know of an online tool or program that would call our phone numbers to confirm that they are up? What I'm imagining is something like pingdom.com (a ping checker for web services), except for the phone system. It would call us, confirm an answer, then hang up. If no answer, it would send an e-mail to our cell phones so we knew about it right away. It seems like there would be a

Sorry Achim I didn't want to be rude, but I forgot to answer on your last Suggestion. Using Kerberos is not really an Option for me, because I want to use smartphones as well with no Thunderbird and no Domain Membership. Regards, --- Mit freundlichem Gru? Carsten Laun-De Lellis Hauptstrasse 13 D-67705 Trippstadt Phone: +49 6306 992140 Fax: +49 6306 992142 Mobile: +49 151 27530865

Hi Vedant, Thanks a lot for your comments! >It looks like a lot of the new infrastructure introduced here <https://github.com/djolertrk/llvm-di-checker/commit/9d26ac2557c584f6cf82ac5535fc47f8bd267a27> consists of logic copied from the debugify implementation. Why is introducing a new pair of passes better than extending the ones we have? The core infrastructure needed to track

My static checker complains that this sprintf() can overflow but really it can't. Just silence the warning by using snprintf(). Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> --- v2: the overflow is not possible so just leave the buffer size alone and silence the warning with snprintf(). diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c index

My static checker complains that this sprintf() can overflow but really it can't. Just silence the warning by using snprintf(). Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> --- v2: the overflow is not possible so just leave the buffer size alone and silence the warning with snprintf(). diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c index

Not sure if there is an app like this yet. I want to keep tabs on my web applications and thought of using a 'page checker'/ I was thinking either running a sum on the directory or each file...but thinking a simple date check would be fine. The idea is web application, except the uploads area for photos, never has changes to its files except when I change it. However, if it gets

Hello, As far as I know, there is no MPX pass in LLVM (though the x86-64 backend already declares MPX registers and instructions). I wonder if anyone is currently working on the LLVM pass for MPX instrumentation, similar to Pointer Checker in gcc. If yes, could anyone elaborate on the status and accessability to other researchers? And if any help is needed? Prof. Santosh Nagarakatte, the author