similar to: Crash with 1.1alpha2 when lazy_expunge is enabled?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Crash with 1.1alpha2 when lazy_expunge is enabled?"

2007 Aug 29
2
Bug? Expunging Symlinked Maildir w/ Lazy_expunge Enabled
Hi all, Using Dovecot 1.0.3 on RedHat Enterprise 5 (kernel 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5PAE), and NFS storage, we symlinked a Maildir folder: /mailstore/user/Maildir/.Junk -> /junkstore/user/Junkmaildir Everything works fine, until we try to expunge, which produces: A04 NO BUG: Unknown internal error This only happens if "lazy_expunge" is enabled: mail_plugins = quota imap_quota acl
2005 Feb 18
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM built on VS C++ 2005
> GCC is smart enough to realize it doesn't return. That's because the > declaration of abort() is decorated with __attribute__((__noreturn__)). > > So is GCC smarter than VC++? As it turns out, in VC++ the declaration of > abort() is decorated with __declspec(noreturn). > > Whidbey is not stricter than 2003, it is merely buggier. VC++ has always > complained
2005 Feb 18
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM built on VS C++ 2005
GCC is smart enough to realize it doesn't return. That's because the declaration of abort() is decorated with __attribute__((__noreturn__)). So is GCC smarter than VC++? As it turns out, in VC++ the declaration of abort() is decorated with __declspec(noreturn). Whidbey is not stricter than 2003, it is merely buggier. VC++ has always complained about functions failing to return a
2013 Jan 03
1
assertion failed: (uidmap[src].real_uid == uid)
Hi all, Does anyone have an idea what could cause the below error? Dec 31 17:03:46 bobodioulasso dovecot: imap(bla at bla.org): Panic: file virtual-sync.c: line 542 (virtual_sync_mailbox_box_remove): assertion failed: (uidmap[src].real_uid == uid) Dec 31 17:03:46 bobodioulasso dovecot: imap(bla at bla.org): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x3c14a) [0x7fe492d1314a]
2007 Sep 21
1
dovecot 1.1alpha6 deliver+quota bugs
I was playing around with dovecot-1.1 and maildir++ quotas, and ran into a reproducible error with indexing. This only seems to be a problem for new maildirs. If I send a message without the quota plugin on, and "seed" the index/control files, future deliveries with the quota plugin seem to succeed without errors. Version: 1.1alpha6 OS: Debian etch/x86 (ext3 filesystem) #
2010 Jul 25
2
using Lazy_Expunge to enforce retention policy
Hi, I've been experimenting with using Lazy_Expunge as a tool to enforce document retention policies (by keeping users from deleting emails forever, instead expiring them after a set time). My problem is, how do I keep the user from deleting/expunging mails *inside the expunge folder itself*? I am using dovecot-1.2.10 built from FreeBSD's ports tree, and I am using the following
2014 Oct 30
0
Bug in the combination of Lazy_expunge and acl plugin
Hello Timo, Hello Dovecot Developers, Hello everyone on the list, I think I have some bug, because I haven't found a working configuration till now. I use latest dovecot 2.2.13 from the dovecot-ee repository, with acl and the lazy_expunge plugin. My configuration for shared folders work fine with lazy_expunge disabled. If I enable lazy_expunge and the user (named userA), which I'm
2009 Dec 28
3
disable lazy_expunge for some mailboxes?
How to disable lazy_expunge for certain mailboxes? My problem is I have a public namespace, whose mail is on a different filesystem than user mails. Some users are allowed to expunge on this shared mailbox, but lazy_expunge is stopping that from working since the mail has to cross a filesystem boundary to make it into the lazy_expunge namespace (location is under the user's home directory).
2020 Aug 29
2
lazy_expunge and fts_autoindex
Hi list, I have both lazy_expunge and fts_autoindex activated (with fts-xapian), as follows: plugin { lazy_expunge = EXPUNGED/ } plugin { fts = xapian fts_xapian = partial=2 full=20 attachments=1 verbose=0 fts_autoindex = yes fts_enforced = yes fts_autoindex_exclude = EXPUNGED fts_autoindex_exclude2 = EXPUNGED/* } However, I still see "indexer-worker...: Info: Indexed 1 messages in
2012 Sep 26
1
Plugin "lazy_expunge" and subfolder
Hi Timo, hi all, we want to use the "lazy_expunge" plugin (from dovecot 2.1.10) and had configured it in a test environemnt like described in "http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge" (1 namespace) There are some subfolders from "INBOX" (like "INBOX/SPAM") in a "maildir++" configuration. All actions on first level directories
2007 Apr 16
2
lazy_expunge vs mulberry
I've configured the lazy_expunge plugin exactly like it says on the wiki. I can't seem to configure Mulberry to find the new namespaces. Any hints? I notice that the wiki says to use / as the separator. Mulberry has a setting for this, and the default is '.'. Leaving this as '.' in Mulberry and / in dovecot seems to work fine. (But I still can't access the
2011 Dec 07
1
lazy_expunge plugin and folder subscription trouble
Hello, I wanted to test the lazy expunge plugin together with mdbox. It seems to me that the folder subscriptions file in the mdbox directory was overwritten with only a few folder names every time I added or removed something in the list of subscribed folders, or even if I turned the imap folder subscription feature off and on. Here is my setup: # 2.0.16:
2015 Feb 18
0
lazy_expunge + mdbox
It appears to me that this issue is related to how lazy_expunge and last_instance work with mdbox - that is different from maildir. With maildir, the message is moved to the expunged namespace only when the last copy is removed (example: from trash folder). With mdbox, first time when you move message from one folder to another, dovecot creates a copy in the expunge namespace. When you delete
2018 Mar 02
0
Autoexpunge of lazy_expunge namespace
Hi, I'm using autoexpunge to clean my users' Trash and Spam mailboxes. But I'm also using lazy_expunge to keep a copy of deleted messages. Is there any to configure lazy_expunge namespace to be autoexpunged too? My lazy_expunge configuration is the "1 Namespace" described at https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge -- Angel L. Mateo Mart?nez Secci?n de
2015 Apr 24
0
acl and lazy_expunge plugins are incompatible?
Hello. Before going into deep testing of 2.2.16 (clean install tbd), I would like to know if someone is using succesfully both ACL and Lazy_expunge plugins. Perhaps I had a config error? Thanks, Paolo > Il 3 marzo 2015 alle 16.36 Paolo Cravero <paolo.cravero at csi.it> ha > scritto: > > > Hello list. > Following two previous unanswered requests >
2011 Mar 01
1
lazy_expunge, 2 questions
Hello List, do some tests with lazy_expunge i have 2 short questions. is it possible to set folder for expunged messages to read-only so no user is possible to really delete them? i can use mdbox for expunged-folder. but would'nt it be more functional to use maildir to have possibility to delete separate mails? when using mdbox the clean up by cron would effect always multiple messages
2017 Sep 04
2
lazy_expunge doesn't work since upgrade 2.2.30 to 2.2.32
Ok thx for the info, anyway there are no mail copied to #EXPUNGED/ namespace. Am 04.09.2017 um 13:40 schrieb Aki Tuomi: > Hi! > > On 04.09.2017 14:38, Harald Leithner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> it seams that the lazy_expunge plugin doesn't work for me after the >> upgrade... >> >> 2.2.32 cry's about >> >> plugin {
2020 Aug 29
0
lazy_expunge and fts_autoindex
Maybe try fts_autoindex_exclude = \EXPUNGED On 2020-08-29 14:34, Gregory Heytings wrote: > Hi list, > > I have both lazy_expunge and fts_autoindex activated (with fts-xapian), > as follows: > > plugin { > lazy_expunge = EXPUNGED/ > } > > plugin { > fts = xapian > fts_xapian = partial=2 full=20 attachments=1 verbose=0 > fts_autoindex = yes >
2013 Feb 08
3
DNS caching is not working on CentOS
Hi All: For whatever reason I can not get dns caching to work on any of my centos boxes. Running Centos 5 and 6. Any thoughts on why these will not run? The services start fine but when telling to perform a dig using itself as the resolver the queries fail (See below). Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ed [root at qmail ~]# ps -aux | grep pdns-recursor Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a
2009 May 27
2
libtheora 1.1alpha2 (thusnelda) release
I'm pleased to announce the second alpha release of our next generation encoder for the free Theora video format, codename "thusnelda". The second release incorporates a number of changes which improve both compression efficiency and execution speed. This release includes working MSVC project files, but the assembly optimization hasn't yet been ported, so performance there will