Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Version 1.1 Alpha 2 Various Stuff"
2007 Dec 12
2
MIME Decoding Problem
I am having a recurring problem with Dovecot 1.0.8 failing to MIME-decode
certain messages. The client is Mulberry 4.0.8. The messages causing the
problem seem to be MIME messages with "no parts". I.e. the message has
some MIME encoding, but is just included as the message body. The kind of
effect I will see is a proliferation of untranslated =xx codes, or in
some cases an untranslated
2004 Feb 10
1
Dovecot and Mulberry
FYI. Does Dovecot implement BODYSTRUCTURE?
An eval copy of Mulberry can be downloaded from
<http://www.cyrusoft.com/mulberry/>.
------------ Forwarded Message ------------
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:56 PM +0100
From: Lennart Petersson <lennart at informatik.gu.se>
To: mulberry-discuss at cyrusoft.com
Subject: Dovecot and Mulberry
I've recently changed my imap-server
2008 Jan 20
4
v1.1.beta14 released (Compile Error)
On Jan 20, 2008, at 12:15 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote:
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:48:09 +0200
> From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>
> Subject: [Dovecot] v1.1.beta14 released
> To: dovecot at dovecot.org
> Message-ID: <1200836889.12450.99.camel at hurina>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
2007 Sep 26
3
v1.0 vs 1.1b re: Postfix and Dovecot LDA
In running the various 1.0.n versions of Dovecot's LDA with the
instructions in the wiki for using LDA with Postfix [on OS X 10.4]
things went well using the instructions as-is (no setuid problems).
This changed in moving over to the 1.1 beta. The LDA refused to work
failing with the error "setgroups() failed: Operation not permitted"
as I mentioned in a previous message.
2004 Dec 19
3
Cannot access a file with Mulberry from a dovecot server if the mail does not end with a newline character.
I use Mulberry 3.1.6 on Windows to read my mails with dovecot 0.99.12
Solaris 9. There are some mail which I cannot read. When I try to open
such a mail, dovecot quits and restarts (I can see that with ps,
nothing is logged). The Mulberry log just looks like this:
| --> #7.2300 Sun Dec 19 12:59:33 2004
| A00009 FETCH 695 (BODY.PEEK[1])
| * 695 FETCH (BODY[1] {61}
|
| --> #7.2300 Sun Dec 19
2005 Sep 06
3
Misbehavior with Dovecot and Mulberry
I'm having a bit of misbehavior wherein Dovecot seems to refuse to
cooperate with my Mulberry MUA. By and large, everything works great.
I can move mail back and forth happily. I can compose a note and copy
the outgoing mail to my Dovecot "Sent" folder using my default Mulberry
settings. But if I reply or forward a mail, I get a Mulberry error popup
saying that it
2007 Apr 16
2
lazy_expunge vs mulberry
I've configured the lazy_expunge plugin exactly like it says on the wiki.
I can't seem to configure Mulberry to find the new namespaces. Any hints?
I notice that the wiki says to use / as the separator. Mulberry has a
setting for this, and the default is '.'. Leaving this as '.' in Mulberry
and / in dovecot seems to work fine. (But I still can't access the
2004 Aug 23
2
MIME structure intermittently lost
I'm using Dovecot-0.99.10.5-0.FC2 on Fedora Core 2 on the server, and
Mulberry 3.1.6 over Win2kSP4 on the client. Intermittently messages with
multiple parts show up as a single text part. I'm not sure if it's Mulberry
or Dovecot. I just turned on IMAP logging and restarted Mulberry and a
message with two text/plain parts that wasn't showing the 2nd part is now
displaying it
2004 Mar 31
0
Mulberry problem
I've been chasing a problem with Mulberry which now actually seems to be a
Dovecot server bug.
The problem manifests itself when manipulating embedded rfc822 messages,
and the analysis comes down to the fact that a FETCH BODY[2] command
returns the same thing as FETCH BODY[2.1]. Both return just the text of the
embedded message, whereas FETCH BODY[2] should return everything including
2004 Apr 03
0
Bug fix - message/rfc822 attachments
Greetings
I've attached a patch that fixes a bug in Dovecot relating to rfc822
attachments. This problem shows up in Mulberry (which hammers the IMAP
protocol more than most!).
The problem is that FETCH BODY[n], where "n" is the number for the
message/rfc822 part, returns the wrong information. It returns the message
without the headers, whereas it should return the entire
2001 Apr 18
2
Configure error 2.2.0 - no locking
I've got Redhat 6.2 kernel 2.2.18 and have been running samba 2.07.
When I try to configure samba 2.2.0, the configure bombs out with
an error
ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe
with what I think relevant lines from the configure output are:
checking for Linux kernel oplocks... no
checking for fcntl locking... no
Is there something I have to enable in the Kernel for
2007 Aug 14
3
use of deliver from procmail advisable?
Hi list,
I understand that dovecot's deliver does a little more than deliver:
it also updates the dovecot metadata stored with each Maildir. Thus,
if I use deliver as opposed to procmail's internal Maildir delivery,
it seems that the IMAP server later has less work to do since the
metadata is can use are up to date.
Doing this, however, incurs an extra process for each mail
delivered. I
2003 Nov 14
1
Calls drop after 10 seconds
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
I setup a new system this morning running on FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE. Using 2
Cisco 7960's we found that the call connects and we can talk for about 10
seconds, then the call drops.
-- Executing Dial("SIP/4340-49da", "SIP/4248|20") in new stack
-- Called 4248
-- SIP/4248-b52c is ringing
--
2004 Sep 14
3
Logging IMAP transactions
Mulberry has the ability to log the IMAP exchange client-side. Is there an
equivalent logging feature in Dovecot (0.99) to log the IMAP exchange
server-side?
My problem is that Mulberry is displaying some complex MIME structures
incorrectly (eg. nested/forwarded messages) but it seems to go away if I
close a folder and re-open it. I'm suspecting that Dovecot is reporting the
wrong
2004 May 23
4
Serve list archives by dovecot IMAP
Has anyone considered setting up a Dovecot public server to serve the list
archives by IMAP? Or does Dovecot not do anonymous read-only access?
(I note by comparison that the Cyrusoft Mulberry list archives are served
by an IMAP server. <http://www.cyrusoft.com/mulberry/support/anonimap.html>)
It should be sufficient to set up Dovecot on some server in the dovecot.org
domain and
2009 Feb 12
3
Can't remove folder (no thunderbird issue)
Hi,
first of all: yes, I already dug the internet but didn't find a solution - that's why I'm asking you.
My provider uses dovecot, although I can't tell you more about the version - sorry. Mail is stored in mbox format.
My trouble:
I was unable to create subfolders and googled a bit. A proposed solution was to append a slash at the end of the folder name.
I used Thunderbird to
2010 May 19
6
dovecot2 latest beta5 acl not working properly ?
Hi
i tested acls with some clients
horde/imp mulberry thunderbird squirrelmail kmail
and i couldnt get it run proberly
i have no problems testing setacl etc with plain
telnet session, and i have no error in verbose logging
but it looks like acl is only working partly with some clients
so show acls is working mostly but setting only partly
horde/imp and mulberry dont show any acls
any idea?
--
2003 Jul 08
2
search throwing "Sequence out of range"
Mulberry client-side message filtering can be persuaded to search for a
nonexistent message ...
<tag> UID SEARCH UNSEEN UNDELETED UNDRAFT 12 (OR FROM "Cron Daemon
<sthen at eeyore.37.spacehopper.org>" SUBJECT "Cron <sthen at wide>
/home/sthen/pingme")
Dovecot 0.99.10 returns this ...
<tag> NO Sequence out of range: 12
I *think* the correct
2003 Jul 07
2
Date sort-order ignoring timezone, and a few Q's.
Timo, thanks for writing and releasing Dovecot. I've recently
discovered it and have been very impressed at the speed and balance
between flexibility and simplicity.
I had to make a packet-trace to be sure that encryption with OpenSSL was
working correctly, since it all 'just worked' first time without complex
configuration, which I don't think I've ever seen before ;-) LDAP
2003 Jan 22
3
brian.casey@mscsoftware.com - Out of office
Is it possible to suspend this user from getting mail for a week otherwise we are going to get loads of "out of office" reports???????
Cheers
-----Original Message-----
From: brian.casey@mscsoftware.com [mailto:brian.casey@mscsoftware.com]
Sent: 22 January 2003 13:34
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] I am out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 01/21/2003