similar to: MD5 mis-match

Hi, I did some performance testing with dovecot and qpopper, if anyone is interested.. Hardware: Dual Xeon 2.8 with HT enabled (dmesg sees 4 cpu-s), 1 GB RAM, SCSI RAID 1 with 2x Maxtor Atlas 10K V disks. Software: CentOS 4.3, Qpopper 4.08 in standalone mode vs Dovecot 1.0-0_19.rc6, ext3 filesystem Mailbox format Mbox, tested Pop3 with PAM authentication My setup had 15 test users with 15

Hi. Does anyone know of a good imap stress testing tool? And one which supports SEARCH commands? I have to compare Courier and Dovecot. I already did some tests using a modified postal/rabid package. I would be thankfully for any hints. Best regards. Erny Yaco Sistemas Spain

Hi, I don't know how to compile Dovecot from src rpm;s - in fact I tried and failed miserably. The only other src rpm I have ever built was postfix, and I ran into a whole bunch of errors trying to build an rpm from the src rpm at ATRpm. Anywho, I was wondering if one of you wonderful Dovecot members would be willing to create an RPM for CentOS 4.5 that includes ldap and ssl. Or, if

I've been working on setting up a Dovecot server with a maildir mailboxes stored over NFS. Initially, everything was working great, and then I started seeing this error as previously discussed on the list in my maillog: (mail_index_expunge): assertion failed: (!t->view->external) Timo, in another thread, suggested to remove line 247 in mail-index-transaction.c in the test52

On 03/02/2015 02:38 AM, Oliver Welter wrote: > Guys, dovecot is open source - if you desire a feature that the upstream > programmer did not include, pay him a bounty to do so or send him a > patch to be included. Period. We can discuss and mightbe somebody will > fork if he is not willing to accept such a solutuion for any political > reason. > > I am really tired of reading

Hey guys, After many trials and tribulations I have now got some fairly stable NFS clients serving dovecot-lda and pop3/imap. Over a 9 hour postal/rabid stress test only saw 5 errors for the 4 servers. Wondering if anyone can shed a bit more light on what they mean exactly. I have tried to find "Resource temporarily unavailable" and "No locks available" in the src to get

I found the proxy performance page in the Wiki. It's interesting to see such good performance for the proxy! However, I was trying to duplicate the tests and am not clear how. Anyone know what a typical test setup would look like? I need to document/test that I can setup a proxy able to handle 100-200 sessions per second which the folks around here are skeptical of. I emailed Tomi directly

From: Dag Wieers > Sorry to interrupt but he was describing how you appeared in previous > postings. And I have to say that I felt the same way reading some of your postings. Really? Then I'll re-read them since there's been a second confirmation. Just know that I wasn't trying to make it about good/bad. I'm just trying to make the point that companies aren't just

From: Feizhou <feizhou at graffiti.net> > I still remember the FIRST Linux GUI installer for a Linux distro. It > came on the Caldera Openlinux 2.2. It worked. It was really nice. Actually, the first distro with a GUI installer was Yggdrasil, circa 1993. It installed on 8MB of RAM using X and Athena/FVWM. > The Novell guys that were behind Caldera deserve plenty of respect for

On 02/04/16 19:21, Sonic wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Luke Barone <lukebarone at gmail.com> wrote: >> When I use systemctl start nmbd smbd I get no >> output. > Actually that's good - it means it worked - starting both nmbd and > smbd. And it's the proper way to run these services (since you're > using systemd). Wrong On debian there is a

hi have a little problem of configuration I have a network with a server (192.168.0.1) and other pc one is 192.168.0.20 i want to reject all output from 192.168.0.20 for port 4000 (tcp and udp) i want accept incoming packet on port 4000 but reject outgoing packet on port 4000 so could you give me a solution please ? thank you PS : I hope you undersatnd waht I want because im frecnh and my

Hi all, I work for Codeweavers.net <http://www.codeweavers.net/> - not to be confused with the US CodeWeavers of CrossOver fame. We produce enterprise software, mainly for the finance sector. We are looking for a developer to take on a young project that I started. I''m becoming the company''s senior network admin for the next 12 months at least, so we need

I'm looking at migrating a small Netware 3.12 server to a Linux box with samba for a small office. They use a DOS program called `ACCPAC' to do their accounting; both the program and it's data reside on different exported volumes on the netware system. I set up a linux box (for testing- deployment later, maybe) to make sure the program would run with samba before going ahead and just

Hi All. There have recently (well, today :-) been changes to OpenSSH Portable's auth-passwd.c from OpenBSD to accomodate forced changes of expired passwords. (Rabid password expirers shoulon't get excited yet, it's currently bsdauth only, but support for other platforms should start trickling in shortly). As part of that, some individual platforms have gained their own

Is there any reason why /etc/hosts would be missing the line, 127.0.0.1 localhost? I just spent an hour trying to figure out why I could not connect to postgresql using ``psql -h ...'', finally figuring out that the /etc/hosts file was the problem. Bill -- INTERNET: bill at celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, Dave McGuire wrote: > On 03/02/2015 02:38 AM, Oliver Welter wrote: >> Guys, dovecot is open source - if you desire a feature that the upstream >> programmer did not include, pay him a bounty to do so or send him a >> patch to be included. Period. We can discuss and mightbe somebody will >> fork if he is

Hi all! I have got a vpn connection set up using FreeSwan and shorewall. Everything works fine but I want to add another subnet to the whole. This means that 1 box will get two net-to-net connections. I want to limit the services on one subnet however. Cuurently I have defined a vpn zone for the current connection and allow all vpn<->loc traffic. How would I go about in tightening the

Dear R users, sorry for this general email and I am sure it has been asked way too many times. IT departements in big companies only want to support the big standards. Whatever big standards means apart from being expensive. We are in the process of trying to get a risk management project for a big conservative company in Germany. As part of the project we would use R to run simulations,

For v1.1, probably applies to v1.0 code pretty easily too: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/078d9dde99c8 The other rquota patches had authunix_create_default() call. Is this needed/useful? The client is now always created+destroyed for each quota lookup. I'd think it would be faster if it was created only once, but does it then break something? If the above isn't done, clnt_create()

After updating to Rails 1.2.1 using gem, I updated my project using Rake. Next, I tried verifying the rails version in my app. If you execute "Rails -v", it reports 1.2.1. But if you execute "ruby script\about" it reports Rails 1.1.6, or if you previously used Edge Rails, it report 1.2.0. Does this look like part of the update didn''t take? I created a fresh