similar to: ACL question

I'm using a virtual mailbox setup. Lets say my users have mailboxes in /home/vmail/domain/%u. What I'm trying to do is setup one namespace that points to /home/vmail/domain and contains everyones mailboxes that I can subscribe to. Is this possible? I tried using a symlink to /home/vmail/domain but it doesn't work because its looking for the dotFoldername. The only way I could

I have successfully setup shadow_copy for normal shares on our samba test server. However, I cannot get it working for the homes share because of its uniqueness. Here is the homes share: [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 browseable = no fstype = XFS 1.2 vfs object = shadow_copy

I'm using the lazy expunge plugin as configured in: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge The page claims users can undelete messages without assistance from a sysadmin. How is this accomplished? When I try to subscribe to the folders under the EXPUNGED namespace, nothing happens. ~Cory Coager

Hi, I am trying to get sieve working with dovecot. Dovecot itself is working fine, and I have the following config: root at master:/var/log# dovecot --version 1.0.rc2 root at master:/var/log# dovecot -n # /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S protocols: imap ssl_disable: yes disable_plaintext_auth: no login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable:

Hi, I run dovecot (2.1.7) on debian wheezy in conjuniction with postfix, samba4 (as ldap backend) and sogo. I configured folder sharing but have an few issues. With my current config users can share the inbox and other folders. If the acl allows creatings subfolders this does work for all folders beside inbox. What i want to archiev is the following: If an user shares his inbox, others

On 11/06/19 16:44, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > > On 11/06/19 14:54, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/06/19 13:29, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via

I have an Active Directory virtual setup and am using LDA to deliver to local recipients. Today I found a big problem with my configuration and not sure if this is fixable. Some of the users have multiple email addresses and the %n variable for user doesn't match their actual username. So if I have realname "Joe Bob" with a username of "joe" and an email of "jbob at

Hi Timo my tests resulted in inheritance is given if a userfolder has set some acl to its new created subfolder , which is nice if some userfolder has its acl from global acl there is no inheritance to its new created subfolders, that subfolders will always created with full owner rights i am not really sure if its a good idea to have inheritance from global acl and if its hackabel what is your

On 11/06/19 13:29, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, http://wiki.dovecot.org/ACL mentions: "Currently there is no ACL inheritance." However this applies to a folder inherit ACLs to existing subfolders; when you share a folder and a non-owner creates a sub-folder within, no ACLs are set, hence, the creator cannot access the new folder. Could the "create mailbox"-process

Hi, we recently purchased a NAS (QNAP) with Samba version 3.5.2. In order to assign permissions on subfolders we enabled Posix ACL's. The problem is that we need to allow only a certain group to do this. The ACL entries in our smb.conf are the following: acl compatibility = auto acl check permissions = Yes acl group control = Yes acl map full control = Yes

Read wasn't the question. Question was about removing children but not the parent. parent-folder -> not removable |_ Children1 -> |_ Children2 -> both removable I don't know how Samba deal with that, but that's not the point for now. For now you have to understand NTFS permissions a little bit (I have not the knowledge to write something like a lesson about NTFS

On 30.01.2024 16:51, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > On 1/30/24 16:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:13:41 +0100 >> Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces >>> Windows compatibility when defined

Hi, using ACL plugin with dovecot 1.1.1 I expected that a Maildir was listed as * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "Foldername" if "create" (k) permission is not set in ACLs and there doesn't exists any subfolders. But to my surprise, dovecot gives the following output: * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Foldername" Therefore the client (here:

Hi, I'm trying to disallow the creating of subfolders for some special folder for all users. Using ACL plugin for this seems to work at first glance but is not a full solution or is buggy as it allows the creation of sub-subfolders. I'm using the following ACL and namespace separator is "/": $ cat folder owner lrwstie Note: no "k" permission ("k" =

Hi I have a share running on a domain member. My domain root user is linked to the domain Administrator (user map). When I go on windows to the share as Administrator I can access it. Then I change the acl settings. I give domain users access to the share. For some reason the changes are not visible on the unix system getfacl returns: root at dna:/data# getfacl /data/share/ getfacl: Removing

Hi All, I am trying to achieve ACL set in Public folders, I have public namespace in dovecot.conf like this namespace public { separator = / prefix = Public/ location = maildir:/var/mail/public/ subscriptions = no } and now under public folder I have two subfolders .test and .test1 . I have created dovecote-acl under .test so that it can be seen and subscribe. but I can't see

Hi, i ve got a problem with recursive acl, using not a vfile global backend. ( no default acl) In my understanding every folder(directory) needs a seperate dovecot-acl files with permissions. This works fine, but my tests showed using a shared namespace like i.e. namespace shared { separator = / prefix = "users/%d/" location = dbox:/usr/local/virtual/%d/ inbox = no list

Using brand new dovecot 2.1.5 I still have a problem with the inheritance of acls. Setting: - maildir with private INBOX and public folders. - users maildir directory (/home/mail/user/ahelmcke) contains dovecot-acl file - public folders root directory (/home/mail/Fax) contains dovecot-acl file When creating a subfolder of the public folder the dovecot-acl files gets copied to the subfolders

Hi everyone, I am having some trouble with shared folders in trying to replicate how we use them with a Cyrus backend. The auth database is Samba4 active directory, so I am using an LDAP lookup to authenticate and forcing the UID and GID to be all the same. I have a post-login script that sets the group ACL, and this seems to be working fine. /mnt/mail is an NFS mount to a FreeNAS machine, and