similar to: dovecot 1.1b4 not listing public folder children

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "dovecot 1.1b4 not listing public folder children"

2007 Oct 21
3
assertion failed: (mailbox_list_is_valid_existing_name(_list, name))
When I was initially testing dovecot 1.1b2,3 I had ACLs turned on and encountered this problem below. I had them turned off until now, I'll need to have ACLs working before I can widen testing. I'm not sure how to make "env MAIL=maildir:~/Maildir gdb /tmp/imap" load the ACL plugin so I assume that is why it does not crash; not getting any log either from that, maybe I made a
2007 Oct 27
2
Segfault when opening a public folder, dovecot 1.1 beta4
I was trying to debug this with gdb, but I'm not sure how to make env MAIL=maildir:~/Maildir MAIL_PLUGINS=acl ACL=vfile gdb /tmp/imap understand the #shared/decs namespace from below so I can SELECT it. I have a number of maildirs under #ahared/decs, I tried opening at least 2 of them but dovecot gives sig 11 without a direct error about the problem. I don't think this was exactly the
2007 Oct 27
4
do 1.1b4 assertion failed: (mailbox_list_is_valid_existing_name
I think this is where I left off last weekend. Instead of this happening at the base of one of my shared mail namespaces, it happens when I try to select a top level folder inside the namespace, or try to directly select an entire path to a folder. This only happens when ACL is enabled. Let me know if I need to provide more. Thanks. Oct 27 16:03:27 gribble dovecot: IMAP(mcdouga9): file
2010 Dec 16
3
namespace and list=children inconsistencies
Hi, after setting up a new Dovecot server with shared and public namespaces, both with hidden=no and list=children, I see some inconsistency in the folder listing. . NAMESPACE * NAMESPACE (("" "/")) (("Shared/" "/")) (("Public/" "/")) . OK Namespace completed. . LIST "" * * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/"
2010 Dec 30
1
Renaming IMAP folders does not affect children
Hi, we're using dovecot2.0 since August and very happy with it. Just recently Thunderbird users reported problems when renaming folders, and it seems that RFC 2060 (sec. 6.3.5) requires children of a renamed folder to be renamed, too. This however does not happen: Talking IMAP I get: * LIST (\HasChildren) "." "INBOX.NNN1" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "."
2007 May 07
6
Dovecot not handling r/o mailboxes completely, and problem with ACL as a workaround
First of all, I think dovecot is really fantastic and I have thanks for all the hard work. I think it will be the best fit for my ~5000 users when I have it setup completely. We normally have approx 500 concurrent IMAP connections during the day. I am trying to convert from courier-imap to dovecot, but I have an issue with public namespace folders that are not writable by certain users.
2007 Nov 17
2
unlink_directory(....Trash.NewFolder) failed: Directory not empty
I noticed the following this week. No idea how long its been happening because I have not tested deleting folders hardly at all. Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a folder "NewFolder", click on it in thunderbird so an index dir is created: ls -ldi Maildir/.NewFolder/ 1504062 drwx------ 5 mcdouga9 egrstaff 4096 Nov 16 19:44 Maildir/.NewFolder/ ls -ldi
2003 Nov 13
2
Children, HasChildren
Hello, I'm using dovecot 0.99.10.2 on a debian box. Mailstore is maildir. If I list the IMAP hierarchy in mutt (debian, 1.5.4+20031024-1) it shows all my plain mailboxes as having subfolders - while none of them have. I straced mutt and this is the IMAP exchange (a bit reformatted for readability): write(6, "a0001 LSUB \"\" \"%\"\r\n", 19) = 19 read(3, "
2007 Nov 21
3
Users w/o acl access appear to be subscribed to public folders (1.1b8)
I noticed this today, I had a user outside of our department test out dovecot. They were using squirrelmail and I noticed that dovecot thinks this user is subscribed to ALL public folders even though a dovecot ACL prevents all access. I'm pretty sure access is still denied. I was able to reproduce this with a guest account I added: l lsub "" "#shared/decs/%" * LSUB
2023 Feb 22
1
Restored mail folders conflict with renamed original ones
On 22/2/2023 2:30 ?.?., Aki Tuomi wrote: > Can you please try > > doveadm exec imap -u username_of_the_user > 1 LIST "" "*" > > and see if it is there? Here is the output: # doveadm exec imap -u userx * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND
2016 Jul 03
2
Shared mailboxes not showing up in shared namespace
Aki, you were right. It was at /usr/lib/dovecot Here is the output: root at mail:~# /usr/lib/dovecot/imap -u m.markov * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT
2010 Jun 21
1
doveadm search: Error: Syncing mailbox foo failed: Mailbox doesn't exist: foo
Hi Timo, doveadm reports errors for \Noselect mailboxes. What I have: 1 LIST "" * * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Templates" * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "INBOX" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "INBOX/Lists" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "INBOX/Lists/vmm" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/"
2019 Jul 16
2
Unexpected result from LIST EXTENDED command
I am executing this command below to dovecot-2.3.5-6.cp1178.x86_64 server Notice that some status responses are missing (For folders INBOX.Archive, INBOX.spam.&-BD0EOQQ9BDkEPQ-). I wonder If this is a bug or working as expected In rfc5819 there is this: If the server runs into unexpected problems while trying to look up the STATUS information, it MAY drop the corresponding STATUS reply. In
2012 Mar 08
1
Shared folder prefix listed multiple times with dovecot 2.1.1
Hi, after upgrading from 2.0.18 to 2.1.1 I noticed that I could not use shared folders with mutt anymore. 2.1 lists the shared namespace prefix once per user sharing an folder in LIST "" "%". I also noticed, that with 2.1 the user folder (Shared/<username>) is no longer tagged as \NoSelect. Is this the intended behaviour and mutt simply cannot cope with it or is it a
2009 Mar 24
1
LIST command claims children exist in empty folder
Dovecot 1.2 (8834:5284f45c249a) Should list return \HasChildren if no folders exist under it? I'm using mbox format. 2 create testfolder/ 2 OK Create completed. 3 list "testfolder/" * * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "testfolder/" 3 OK List completed. 4 list "testfolder/" % * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "testfolder/" 4
2007 Oct 02
2
Folder renaming oddities.
Hi Timo, We are observing some weird behaviour when we try to rename an inferior folder, followed by the superior folder. These folders have an asterisk in the name. * LIST (\HasChildren) "." "*Own Family" * LIST (\HasChildren) "." "*Own Family.Tour" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "*Own Family.Maid" * LIST (\HasNoChildren)
2016 Jul 02
2
Shared mailboxes not showing up in shared namespace
I don?t seem to have that install on my Debian machine. But I have done this: 1 LIST "" % * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" confirmed-spam * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" Archive * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Sent) "/" Sent * LIST (\HasChildren \Trash) "/" Trash * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" Spam * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" Archives * LIST
2008 Feb 06
1
imap fs quota (rpc) won't work?
In the past I dabbled with the imap quota plugin with the fs backend because I wanted to report usage to my users (not limit them). At the time, the quota plugin would make dovecot crash when trying to write to a folder (I can bring up this report if needed). However, in a later beta of dovecot 1.1 I tried quota again but I cannot get it to report any results. I've been wanting to use
2010 Oct 27
2
Problem with namespace (maybe bug?)
Hi! Could you tell me what is wrong with an "existence" of mailbox? Please see the two examples: . list "" "*" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Trash" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Junk" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Sent" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Drafts" * LIST
2007 Nov 06
3
Various uidlist and index errors with 1.1 on NFS
Two nights ago I took a leap and extended my testing of dovecot 1.1 by replacing 1.0 for the approx 15 users I had on 1.0. At that time I also for the first time tried dovecot 1.1 in a load balanced 2 server configuration with indexes on NFS. I was hoping I did this right, using the mail_nfs params and 1.1 so fchown etc would flush the access cache, but I am getting a number of messages and