similar to: Messages not marked as read

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Messages not marked as read"

2007 Apr 02
2
How to integrate dspam and dovecot
Hello all, I am currently setting up a new mail server with Qmail, OpenLDAP and Dovecot in CentOS-4.4. Qmail version is 1.03, OpenLDAP is 2.3 and Dovecot version is dovecot-1.0-3_50.rc27(RPM). I have successfully installed and tested it. But I have two issues with the current setup: #1. I am using dovecot LDA and configured the OpenLDAP such that the mail be delivered to the virtual users
2003 Oct 02
2
Patches
As the freeze for Debian sarge slowly approaches I want to make sure the Dovecot packages are in as good condition as possible. I see there have been a number of patches since 0.99.10. I have added the following patches: * segfault when user home directory is empty * Proper PAM service name * Make suid work on 2.6 kernels Any other patches thatI ought to add. Or better yet, will there be a
2004 Dec 06
1
Can't download Honey
Hello everybody, I can't download Honey from theora.ogg via torrent. The error message I got is : [16:58:19] Problem connecting to tracker - <urlopen error (111, 'Connection refused')> The command i tried was : btdownloadcurses.py --max_upload_rate 350 --url http://www.theora.org/torrents/Honey-small.torrent Please help me. Thanks in Advance regards Manilal --
2011 Aug 08
2
How to make dovecot-lda/deliver mark a message as seen
Hello everybody, I am using dovecot 2.0.13 and have a special case here in which I want a mail that is delivered locally with dovecot-lda to be marked as "seen". In dovecot 1.1.7 I succeeded to achive this, by modifing deliver.c so that upon adding a -S switch to the command arguments, the flag MAIL_SEEN was added to the call of mailbox_copy(). This seemed to work pretty good.
2003 Sep 29
1
Handling of X-Status flags
Hi all, I've done a bit of searching and haven't seen anybody else coming across this problem yet: I noticed that Dovecot uses the opposite flags for marking messages as deleted and draft to most other MUAs I've seen or used: With PINE, mutt and uw-imapd at least, messages are marked with X-Status 'D' for Deleted, and 'T' for drafT. Dovecot reverses this behaviour,
2006 Dec 06
2
Changing the Seen Flags
Hi , Can we change the setting on dovecot so that the Seen mail flag S should be saved where everybody can see that and not in the dovecot.index file As we are facing problems with public folder read/unread mails. Any help is appreciated Thanks, Amardeep
2005 Sep 18
2
Maildir quota's
Hey, is http://www.dovecot.org/patches/1.0/quota.tar.gz supposed to work with maildir quota's for virtual mailboxes? Using it with dovecot-lda (cvs) results in DSN Your message was automatically rejected by Sieve, a mail filtering language. The following reason was given: Internal quota calculation error Thanks, Lieven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was
2008 Aug 01
1
namespaces at v1.0.15
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, i need to create a public maildir folder for virtual users so i did this: dovecot-1.0.15: namespace public { prefix = public/ separator = / location = maildir:/var/mail/shared:INDEX=/var/mail/shared/%u/index/:CONTROL=/var/mail/shared/%u/control/ } namespace private { separator = / prefix = inbox =
2005 May 20
1
pop3/commands.c query
Is this correct ? cmd_rset() if (mail_update_flags(mail, MAIL_SEEN, MODIFY_REMOVE) < 0) break; Args seems to be switched. /Jens ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 'This mail automatically becomes portable when carried.' ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Jens L??s
2010 Apr 07
1
Per-user flags for shared folders
As I see in 2.0 there willn't be ability to control which flags should be shared, and which should be per-user. But may be there is some plans to implement settings to control that? It'll be great if you can write in dovecot-shared file which flags should be per-user. It's very usefull for group mailboxes, when each user should work with such mailbox like with their own. Now I
2009 Aug 11
1
dovecot-1.2.3 (managesieve) crash with backtrace
>From the log: Aug 11 09:07:23 postamt dovecot: IMAP(zensy): Panic: file mail-index-transaction-view.c: line 106 (tview_apply_flag_updates): assertion failed: (map->hdr.record_size <= tview->record_size) Aug 11 09:07:23 postamt dovecot: IMAP(zensy): Raw backtrace: imap [0x80f0411] -> imap [0x80f0482] -> imap [0x80efe29] -> imap [0x80c839b] -> imap [0x80cea95] -> imap
2008 Jun 27
3
Keeping \Seen flag private
Hi all, I wanna to set up shared folders for a couple of users and I'd like that everyone could keep the \Seen flag as private. So if user #1 reads some messages and user #2 not, those messages appear as "unseen" to #2 and "seen" to #1. I've implemented shared folders using namespaces with every user having their own "control" and "private"
2008 May 19
2
no bookeeping using public folders
Using dovecot 1.0.10. In the config: namespace public { separator = / hidden = no prefix = Flock/ location = maildir:/home/baratin/PublicMaildir:CONTROL=~/Maildir/control/Flock:INDEX=/var/dovecot/index/%u/Flock } This should be a public mail folder owned by "baratin", "read only" for all other users. Every user has his/her own control and index area
2008 May 28
6
Error using antispam plugin
Hi When activating antispam plugin in imap protocol, when sending an email, Evolution/Thunderbirdkeeps infinitely "Sending authentication information", and Dovecor logs shows "dovecot: May 28 10:14:35 Error: child 6910 (imap) killed with signal 11"; lots of empty folders in /tmp are created with names like "antispam-mail-ZvyWeZ". I am using Dovecot1.1 rc15 compiled
2008 Oct 09
5
Panic 1.1.4
Hi List, try 1.1.4 and have new Panics in Log. Hoped that 1.1.3 finishes this errors... Oct 8 21:56:28 dd10636 dovecot: IMAP(username): Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib/dovecot/imap Oct 8 21:56:28 dd10636 dovecot: IMAP(username): Module loaded: /usr/lib/dovecot/imap/lib20_mail_log_plugin.so Oct 8 21:56:28 dd10636 dovecot: IMAP(username): Effective uid=857, gid=628,
2006 Jan 31
1
beta2: strange assert
Hi, My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format, mailboxes NFS mounted from another S9 system, imap. I got the following assert yesterday: Jan 30 19:57:15 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file index-mail-headers.c: line 258 (index_mail_parse_header): assertion failed: (part != NULL) Jan 30 19:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file index-mail-headers.c: line
2014 Mar 11
2
Panic: file mail-index-map.c: line 547 (mail_index_map_lookup_seq_range): assertion failed: (first_uid > 0)
Version: 2.2.12 OS: Debian wheezy x86_64 2014 Mar 11 20:06:53 ptb-test imap(flor_hardy): Panic: file mail-index-map.c: line 547 (mail_index_map_lookup_seq_range): assertion failed: (first_uid > 0) 2014 Mar 11 20:06:53 ptb-test imap(flor_hardy): Fatal: master: service(imap): child 2760 killed with signal 6 (core dumped) GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation,
2014 May 03
1
CONTEXT=SORT
Any reason this is not listed in the CAPABILITY string? I see it listed as a TODO here: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap But it seems to work fine (as of 2.2.12): 1 UID SORT RETURN (CONTEXT COUNT) (SUBJECT) UTF-8 UNDELETED * ESEARCH (TAG "1") UID COUNT 12 1 OK Sort completed (0.000 secs). 2 UID SORT RETURN (UPDATE COUNT) (SUBJECT) UTF-8 UNDELETED * ESEARCH (TAG "2") UID
2003 Oct 09
1
Problem with DTMF 'looping' / mis-dials (X100P card)
Hi all, I'm having a problem with * being very finicky about the length of DTMF key-presses during menus, voicemail, etc. Basically, short (<100 ms) tones are ignored, anything between 100ms (or so) and about 300ms is correctly detected, and anything >300ms is interpreted as multiple presses of the same key. This is terrible for callers who are trying to get to the correct
2010 Jun 04
3
SORT with unknown charset bug?
I'm not sure this is a known bug. I'm using dovecot 1.1.19. C: s SORT (DATE) blah ALL UNDELETED OR HEADER SUBJECT {4} S: + OK C: asdf HEADER FROM {4} S: + OK C: asdf S: * SORT 1 2 4 5 3 6 7 (... all messages in folder) S: s NO [BADCHARSET] Unknown charset I think there shouldn't be "* SORT... " response. -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak http://alec.pl gg:2275252