Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Messages not marked as read"
2007 Apr 02
2
How to integrate dspam and dovecot
Hello all,
I am currently setting up a new mail server with Qmail, OpenLDAP and
Dovecot in CentOS-4.4. Qmail version is 1.03, OpenLDAP is 2.3 and
Dovecot version is dovecot-1.0-3_50.rc27(RPM). I have successfully
installed and tested it. But I have two issues with the current setup:
#1.
I am using dovecot LDA and configured the OpenLDAP such that the mail
be delivered to the virtual users
2003 Oct 02
2
Patches
As the freeze for Debian sarge slowly approaches I want to make sure
the Dovecot packages are in as good condition as possible. I see there
have been a number of patches since 0.99.10. I have added the following
patches:
* segfault when user home directory is empty
* Proper PAM service name
* Make suid work on 2.6 kernels
Any other patches thatI ought to add. Or better yet, will there be a
2004 Dec 06
1
Can't download Honey
Hello everybody,
I can't download Honey from theora.ogg via torrent. The error message I got is :
[16:58:19] Problem connecting to tracker - <urlopen error (111, 'Connection refused')>
The command i tried was :
btdownloadcurses.py --max_upload_rate 350 --url http://www.theora.org/torrents/Honey-small.torrent
Please help me.
Thanks in Advance
regards
Manilal
--
2011 Aug 08
2
How to make dovecot-lda/deliver mark a message as seen
Hello everybody,
I am using dovecot 2.0.13 and have a special case here in which I want a
mail that is delivered locally with dovecot-lda to be marked as "seen".
In dovecot 1.1.7 I succeeded to achive this, by modifing deliver.c so
that upon adding a -S switch to the command arguments, the flag
MAIL_SEEN was added to the call of mailbox_copy(). This seemed to work
pretty good.
2003 Sep 29
1
Handling of X-Status flags
Hi all,
I've done a bit of searching and haven't seen anybody else coming
across this problem yet:
I noticed that Dovecot uses the opposite flags for marking messages
as deleted and draft to most other MUAs I've seen or used:
With PINE, mutt and uw-imapd at least, messages are marked with
X-Status 'D' for Deleted, and 'T' for drafT. Dovecot reverses this
behaviour,
2006 Dec 06
2
Changing the Seen Flags
Hi ,
Can we change the setting on dovecot so that the Seen mail flag S should
be saved
where everybody can see that and not in the dovecot.index file
As we are facing problems with public folder read/unread mails.
Any help is appreciated
Thanks,
Amardeep
2005 Sep 18
2
Maildir quota's
Hey,
is
http://www.dovecot.org/patches/1.0/quota.tar.gz
supposed to work with maildir quota's for virtual mailboxes? Using it
with dovecot-lda (cvs) results in DSN
Your message was automatically rejected by Sieve, a mail
filtering language.
The following reason was given:
Internal quota calculation error
Thanks,
Lieven
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was
2008 Aug 01
1
namespaces at v1.0.15
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
i need to create a public maildir folder for virtual users so i did this:
dovecot-1.0.15:
namespace public {
prefix = public/
separator = /
location =
maildir:/var/mail/shared:INDEX=/var/mail/shared/%u/index/:CONTROL=/var/mail/shared/%u/control/
}
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix =
inbox =
2005 May 20
1
pop3/commands.c query
Is this correct ?
cmd_rset()
if (mail_update_flags(mail, MAIL_SEEN,
MODIFY_REMOVE) < 0)
break;
Args seems to be switched.
/Jens
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
'This mail automatically becomes portable when carried.'
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jens L??s
2010 Apr 07
1
Per-user flags for shared folders
As I see in 2.0 there willn't be ability to control which flags should be
shared, and which should be per-user. But may be there is some plans to
implement settings to control that?
It'll be great if you can write in dovecot-shared file which flags should be
per-user. It's very usefull for group mailboxes, when each user should work
with such mailbox like with their own. Now I
2009 Aug 11
1
dovecot-1.2.3 (managesieve) crash with backtrace
>From the log:
Aug 11 09:07:23 postamt dovecot: IMAP(zensy): Panic: file mail-index-transaction-view.c: line 106 (tview_apply_flag_updates): assertion failed: (map->hdr.record_size <= tview->record_size)
Aug 11 09:07:23 postamt dovecot: IMAP(zensy): Raw backtrace: imap [0x80f0411] -> imap [0x80f0482] -> imap [0x80efe29] -> imap
[0x80c839b] -> imap [0x80cea95] -> imap
2008 Jun 27
3
Keeping \Seen flag private
Hi all,
I wanna to set up shared folders for a couple of users and I'd like that
everyone could keep the \Seen flag as private. So if user #1 reads some
messages and user #2 not, those messages appear as "unseen" to #2 and "seen"
to #1.
I've implemented shared folders using namespaces with every user having their
own "control" and "private"
2008 May 19
2
no bookeeping using public folders
Using dovecot 1.0.10. In the config:
namespace public {
separator = /
hidden = no
prefix = Flock/
location =
maildir:/home/baratin/PublicMaildir:CONTROL=~/Maildir/control/Flock:INDEX=/var/dovecot/index/%u/Flock
}
This should be a public mail folder owned by "baratin", "read only" for
all other users. Every user has his/her own control and index area
2008 May 28
6
Error using antispam plugin
Hi
When activating antispam plugin in imap protocol, when sending an
email, Evolution/Thunderbirdkeeps infinitely "Sending authentication
information", and Dovecor logs shows "dovecot: May 28 10:14:35 Error:
child 6910 (imap) killed with signal 11"; lots of empty folders in
/tmp are created with names like "antispam-mail-ZvyWeZ".
I am using Dovecot1.1 rc15 compiled
2008 Oct 09
5
Panic 1.1.4
Hi List,
try 1.1.4 and have new Panics in Log. Hoped that 1.1.3 finishes this
errors...
Oct 8 21:56:28 dd10636 dovecot: IMAP(username): Loading modules from
directory: /usr/lib/dovecot/imap
Oct 8 21:56:28 dd10636 dovecot: IMAP(username): Module loaded:
/usr/lib/dovecot/imap/lib20_mail_log_plugin.so
Oct 8 21:56:28 dd10636 dovecot: IMAP(username): Effective uid=857, gid=628,
2006 Jan 31
1
beta2: strange assert
Hi,
My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format, mailboxes NFS mounted from
another S9 system, imap. I got the following assert yesterday:
Jan 30 19:57:15 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user):
file index-mail-headers.c: line 258 (index_mail_parse_header): assertion
failed: (part != NULL)
Jan 30 19:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user):
file index-mail-headers.c: line
2014 Mar 11
2
Panic: file mail-index-map.c: line 547 (mail_index_map_lookup_seq_range): assertion failed: (first_uid > 0)
Version: 2.2.12
OS: Debian wheezy x86_64
2014 Mar 11 20:06:53 ptb-test imap(flor_hardy): Panic: file mail-index-map.c: line 547 (mail_index_map_lookup_seq_range): assertion failed: (first_uid > 0)
2014 Mar 11 20:06:53 ptb-test imap(flor_hardy): Fatal: master: service(imap): child 2760 killed with signal 6 (core dumped)
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation,
2014 May 03
1
CONTEXT=SORT
Any reason this is not listed in the CAPABILITY string?
I see it listed as a TODO here: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap
But it seems to work fine (as of 2.2.12):
1 UID SORT RETURN (CONTEXT COUNT) (SUBJECT) UTF-8 UNDELETED
* ESEARCH (TAG "1") UID COUNT 12
1 OK Sort completed (0.000 secs).
2 UID SORT RETURN (UPDATE COUNT) (SUBJECT) UTF-8 UNDELETED
* ESEARCH (TAG "2") UID
2003 Oct 09
1
Problem with DTMF 'looping' / mis-dials (X100P card)
Hi all,
I'm having a problem with * being very finicky about the length of
DTMF key-presses during menus, voicemail, etc. Basically, short (<100
ms) tones are ignored, anything between 100ms (or so) and about 300ms
is correctly detected, and anything >300ms is interpreted as multiple
presses of the same key. This is terrible for callers who are trying
to get to the correct
2010 Jun 04
3
SORT with unknown charset bug?
I'm not sure this is a known bug. I'm using dovecot 1.1.19.
C: s SORT (DATE) blah ALL UNDELETED OR HEADER SUBJECT {4}
S: + OK
C: asdf HEADER FROM {4}
S: + OK
C: asdf
S: * SORT 1 2 4 5 3 6 7 (... all messages in folder)
S: s NO [BADCHARSET] Unknown charset
I think there shouldn't be "* SORT... " response.
--
Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak http://alec.pl gg:2275252