similar to: Problem in mbox-sync.c

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Problem in mbox-sync.c"

2008 Dec 04
1
assertion failed in 1.1.7 file mbox-sync.c: line 1305 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates)
Dovecot 1.1.7 is running so smoothly that I gave up checking its log files daily. :) I've just had a look, and among the usual "IMAP(username): FETCH for mailbox Sent UID xx got too little data: xx vs xx" messages (that means that unfortunately sometimes some messages are still written truncated) I saw this assertion failure: file mbox-sync.c: line 1305
2005 Oct 20
2
1.0.alpha4 released
The actual alpha4 release this time. With a few changes since the pre-release. The important changes again: - Default lock_method changed to flock instead of the old fcntl. Solaris users will need to set it back to fcntl. This makes sure that Dovecot's indexes aren't accidentally used with NFS. - IMAP: We might have sent extra EXPUNGE messages when output buffer got full. This could
2012 Jan 10
1
Panic: file mbox-sync.c: line 1348: assertion failed
Hallo, I have the following problem with doveadm: # gdb --args /opt/local/bin/doveadm -v mailbox status -u userxy/g029 'messages' "Software-alle/AK-Software-Tagung" GNU gdb 5.3 Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
2004 Jun 18
3
1.0-test17
http://dovecot.org/test/ Just mbox fixes since 1.0-test16. The logic is simpler and more correct now. Can anyone break it anymore? I actually tested it a while with Evolution and several mailboxes and it didn't break at least immediately. :) Now maybe a few more days and I dare trying this thing myself with my real mboxes (yes, I'm still using them). Dovecot mailing list archives could
2013 Aug 05
1
Corrupted mboxes with v2.2.4, posix_fallocate and GFS2
Hi, on a clustered Dovecot server installation that was recently moved from a shared GPFS filesystem to GFS2, occasional corruptions in the users' INBOXes started appearing, where a new incoming message would be appended directly after a block of NUL bytes, and be scanned by dovecot as being glued to the preceding message. I traced this to the file extension operation performed in
2006 Dec 14
2
604995471 7500 routers / upgrade issue
Hi Benjamin: I think that the following link will give you an idea for what you need to know: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/620/roadmap_b.shtml This is for the naming: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1818/products_tech_note09186a0080101cda.shtml In this case 11.1CC goes to 12.0T and 12.0T migrate to 12.1 mainline. Do not you worry you will not loose anything with the new
2006 Nov 12
2
assertion failed: (need_space == (uoff_t)-mails[idx].space)
I'm running Dovecot dovecot-1.0.r13 on FreeBSD (FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE- p10). Mail is stored in mbox format (dovecot.conf after the msg). Procmail delivers mail to subfolders under ~/.mail, locking using dotfiles. One folder in particular for one user has an mbox file ~/.mail/Cron. Quite often, I'll see that procmail processes are stacking up because ~/.mail/Cron.lock exists, and
2005 May 16
2
Assertion Failure in mbox-sync.c
I've been getting a few of these errors on a couple different mboxes. This is using the CVS version as of May 14. So far, these are the only errors and it looks like most/all of the older ones are gone. (maybe I shouldn't say that ;-) dovecot: May 16 17:41:07 Error: 20973 IMAP(todd.bluegenesis.com): file mbox-sync.c: line 1165 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates): assertion failed:
2005 Aug 16
2
test80: assert/core debug info
Timo, Attached is gdb information from core dumps related to the following assert in test-80: IMAP(username): file mbox-sync-update.c: line 442 (mbox_sync_update_header_from): assertion failed: (ctx->mail.uid == 0 || ctx->mail.uid_broken || ctx->mail.uid == mail->uid) My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format. test-80 compiled with gcc 4.0.1 using the following configure options: CC=gcc
2007 Jan 05
2
Dovecot rc15 crash in mbox-sync-update.c
Here is another crash we've been seeing recently in rc15 on Solaris 10. (gdb) bt full #0 0xff1c12a4 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #1 0xff140040 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #2 0x000786a8 in t_buffer_alloc (size=688976) at data-stack.c:346 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "file %s: line %" #3 0x00078190 in t_pop () at data-stack.c:149 frame_block = (struct
2009 Jul 05
1
mbox sync failure2
Hello, list, I'm new here and also new to Dovecot. On Friday evening (perhaps not the best moment...) I sent the following question but it seems to have been lost somehow: Yesterday I had to reboot my server machine and I think there was an email client connected from the LAN during the reboot which I did not notice then. Now that mailbox is no longer accessible: as soon as I try to
2017 Jun 06
2
2.2.29.8: YACD (Yet Another Core Dump)
I'm getting this in my logfile, should I worry?: Jun 06 12:28:47 imap(paco_mcs): Error: Next message unexpectedly corrupted in mbox file /var/spool/mail/paco_mcs at 639279728 Jun 06 12:28:47 imap(paco_mcs): Error: Unexpectedly lost From-line from mbox file /var/spool/mail/paco_mcs at 639279728 Jun 06 12:28:47 imap(paco_mcs): Panic: file mbox-sync.c: line 1338 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates):
2013 Jan 11
1
libvirt RPC error
Hi, I'm using qemu+ssh://username at hostname/system as the remote URI. Libvirt seems to be communicating fine until some 2 minutes (we poll every 5 seconds) and then it throws up RPC error and many counters are wrong. But if I collect on localhost the counters seems to be coming fine. Test and testvm are guests on the local machine where as Win8 and Ubuntu* are remote URI's connected
2006 Jan 24
0
1.0beta2: mbox_sync assert
Timo, My first assert in beta2. Syslog said: Jan 24 09:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): Cached message offset 94625 is invalid for mbox file /var/mail/m/user Jan 24 09:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file mbox-sync.c: line 1471 (mbox_sync_do): assertion failed: (!sync_ctx->mbox->mbox_sync_dirty || (flags & MBOX_SYNC_UNDIRTY) == 0) Gdb
2017 Jul 26
0
Issue on install - file mbox-sync.c: line 1371 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates): assertion failed: (trailer_size <= 2)
First of all apologies for using such an old version - I am trying to upgrade slowly and have had to go through this version first. As you can see I am getting an error in the log file as : file mbox-sync.c: line 1371 (mbox_sync_handle_eof_updates): assertion failed: (trailer_size <= 2) Raw backtrace: imap [0x80acdc1] -> imap [0x80accdc] -> imap(mbox_sync+0x14e9) [0x8079a29]
2006 Aug 01
1
Inconsistent handling of CRLF in APPEND
One of the recent 1.0 commits relating to CRLF handling (maybe 2006-06-24) has changed the behaviour of APPEND when using mbox files with ordinary plain text emails. When a client stores a new message using an APPEND command (eg. saving a draft or copy of a sent message), it uses CRLF consistently as a line-ending throughout the literal data block over the wire - both for the header and the
2011 Aug 24
3
Catch22: user needs space to fix out of space condition
A mail user reported that he filled up his INBOX (despite reminders he was approaching his filesystem quota), and furthermore, he could not fix the situation because he couldn't expunge message he marked for deletion. The dovecot logs revealed the cause dovecot: imap(user): Error: open(/var/mail/user.lock) failed: Disc quota exceeded This created an impasse where a user cannot free
2010 Mar 14
3
Removing Duplicates
Hi all, I am starting fresh with a local repository of mails, which almost certainly have duplicates in them. I am going to use maildirs, and ensure all mails are input with CRLFs. The question is: does anybody know how I can find and remove duplicates, either while injecting mail with IMAP, or afterward? I can use tools to find duplicate Message-IDs, but don't know of a way to remove
2005 Aug 25
2
Something other than dotlock for uidlist locking?
If I read the code correctly, only dotlocks are supported for locking of dovecot-uidlist. And I don't see any settings in the config file for it. As it turns out, dotlocks are very slow on my system, due to their implementation via hardlinks. Would it be possible to support other locking mechanisms for locking of the uidlist file? -jdb
2006 Jun 26
1
mbox locking
Hello, I'd like to make sure my understanding of the mbox locking strategy is correct : - "mbox_dotlock_change_timeout" directive : a process seeing that an already locked (by another process) mbox he want to access hasn't change for this amount of time, allows himself to override the lock ? If it's using fcntl, is it only possible to override ? -