similar to: ActionWebService: XMLRPC Server Multicall possible?

Hello i have some trouble getting my webservice to run . I have the following webservice : class DirectSpoolAPI < ActionWebService::API::Base api_method :add, :expects => [{:html=>:string},{:from=>:string}], :returns => [Customer] end class DirectSpoolService < ActionWebService::Base web_service_api DirectSpoolAPI def add(html,from) Customer.find(:first) end

I testing Puppet 0.19.3. If we decide to use it, we''d deploy it across several thousand hosts. The method described for creating client certificates described in the documentation - running "puppetd --server <server> --waitforcert 60 --test" and "puppetca --sign <client>" - is not practical for our installation. I''ve tried creating

Hi all, I dug around a bit, may have missed it. Is there a method automatically generated by ActionWebService (or XMLRPC::Server) that a client can use to list all available service methods (perhaps along with docs)? Or do I have to roll that myself? Thanks, Dan This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this

Moritz Muehlenhoff writes ("Re: Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214"): > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 05:06:07PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I have fixed these in stretch but the jessie package remains unfixed. > > I think I may be able to find some backports somewhere. Would that be > > useful ? Is anyone else working on this ? > >

Moritz Muehlenhoff writes ("Re: Xen package security updates for jessie 4.4, XSA-213, XSA-214"): > Yes, the distribution line should be jessie-security, but please send > a debdiff to team at security.debian.org for a quick review before > uploading (I have no idea whether dgit supports security-master). Here is the proposed debdiff (actually, a git diff) for xen in jessie. My

Hello, I have seen some odd behaviour of my Web Services code plus some ''similar'' postings to this list, so I believe this may be a bug in Rails. But I''m failry new to RoR, so maybe I''m doing something wrong. I''ll explain: I have a WS API defined, communicating with a remote system that expects a stucture: When defined like this (all

Hi Rich I'm running openstack compute node on powerpc ubuntu 13.10 and openstack controller node on ubuntu x86 machine.Initially when I tried booting VM from controller node onto powerpc compute node,the nova-compute service which is responsible for booting VM on compute node was searching for libguestfs-test-tool.After compiling linguesftfs for powerpc,the nova-compute resulted in the

Hi List- I''m brand new to xen but an old hand with Linux. With a fresh, clean, Gentoo installation on this box, I''m attempting to install xen using the gentoo-standard: emerge xen but the process is failing with an error that''s very similar to one reported by another user (A Streetcar Named: see

hi all, i have been trying to study web services using rails so far i succesful with server implementations in REST,SOAP,XML-RPC but the client code is troubling me. i have done most of the coding as per the rails book agile web development i.e implementations of the servers and when i invoke them they give result but when i try to acces them through another controller it gives time out error

Hi all, This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native), primarily because of the ptent = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, pte); ptent = pte_modify(ptent, newprot); /* ... */ set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte,

Hi all, This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native), primarily because of the ptent = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, pte); ptent = pte_modify(ptent, newprot); /* ... */ set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte,

Hi all, This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native), primarily because of the ptent = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, pte); ptent = pte_modify(ptent, newprot); /* ... */ set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte,

Problems start before any of the kaiser code executes, though it could still be related to CONFIG_KAISER since that has effects beyond kaiser.c. --- (early) Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset (early) Initializing cgroup subsys cpu (early) Linux version 2.6.32-696.18.7.el6.x86_64 (mockbuild at c1bl.rdu2.centos.org) (gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-18) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Thu Jan 4 17:31:22 UTC

Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),

Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),

Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),

I''ve attached a python script that collects stats from DomUs (HVM and PVM). I hope this would be useful for somebody else. See comments for more info. regards, Diego -- -------------- Diego Woitasen XTECH _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, I am using XEN-4.1.2 and linux-2.6.32 as dom0. After I upgraded stackless python from 2.5 to 2.7 (and rebuilt xen). XenAPI became unusable, I spent some time to investigate XenAPI,py, it looks fine. So, I guess xend has problem with python 2.7, because it always returned method unknown. Do I have to tweak xend to let it support python 2.7? Thanks, Eric /root # python Python 2.7.5 Stackless

Hi all, a newbie question. I''m trying to install lenny guest image (in an img file) on my lenny Dom0 by following the http://wiki.debian.org/Xen: xm create -c xm-debian.cfg install=true install-mirror=ftp://ftp.XX.debian.org/debian i created the xen-lenny-image.img using dd, format is ext3. disk is defined as (cfg file): disk =

This is my question: it is possible to call from one phone many others phones in the same time, like an "active" MeetMe function? I.e.: I make a call with a specified number. Asterisk lets ring many telephones together (like a group call). Then anyone that answer can hear and speak like MeetMe. Thanks for any answer. Alex