similar to: --enable-headers-install problem in 1.0.5

Hi List, Plis, where can i find an updated version (for recently dovecot v1.0.0) of dovecot.spec, needed to build an rpm for RH 4? Thanks in advance, Juan Carlos

Has anyone done configuration of apache webserver with Tomcat 5.5.7 I cannot integrate them together?> Any help will be appreciated Regards Vaneet Vaneet Sharma executive manager iDeasTank Limited an iwg business dolphins'' court po 388 valletta, m-malta/europe mobile: +356 9943 8263 skype: CALLVANEET fax: +356 9952 8888 phone: +356 9942 8888 vaneet@iwg.info call me on

We're stuck on RHEL 4.x, so we're currently working on a plan to live in harmony with .99 for another year or so. With that said, the plan is below. Let me know if you have any other recommendations. [ ]Convert to high-performance mode vice high-security to reduce overall resource usage. [ ]Implement iptables throttling for new connections to prevent denials of service. [ ]Covert from

I'm sitting here working away on various unrelated projects and watching patch after patch after patch flow in from Timo to fix all sorts of problems people are reporting. A coding madman on fire. Thanks Timo, you rock. I appreciate the time you spend on this software, I'm sure everyone else does as well. :) -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com

Team, Is anyone aware of a Red Hat Network alike system of server package update status that could be adapted for CentOS3? I'm not interested in the complete management aspect (channels, scheduling remote updates, etc) but merely the ability to see your list of systems and determine which are out of date with XXX packages. If you happen to manage a large-ish number of RHES3 systems, you

> [jhg at helios RPMS]$ rpm -q dovecot > dovecot-1.0-1_42.rc21.fc5.at but: > dovecot: Feb 05 10:49:21 Info: Dovecot v1.0.rc19 starting up

Build team -- what's our current outlook on the 4 Final release shaping up to be (ie, this week, next week, a month..)? Should it be further out, would it be relatively painless to 'upgrade' (so to speak) from the current RC1 to Final when it rolls around? thanks! -te (I have a new project server waiting in limbo, would like to at least get started - nonproduction) -- Troy

We're going to replace an older Solaris7/Netbackup/TapeRobot server with a new Centos box using backup-to-disk-to-tape (probably using Arkeia). The specs are up in the air, but generally: - CentOS/RHEL friendly (3Ware SATA? SCSI?) - 2U/3U/4U-ish form factor - hotswap RAID5 - dual PS, hotswap a plus - USB2.0 port(s) (*) To give you an idea of where I'm starting to look, take a gander at

A new employee started today, when logging into his new mailbox this morning during a walk-through I got a nasty server error response in Thunderbird - something I never see, DC runs smooth as butter for us. Checking the server log I see this: == snip == dovecot: Jul 09 09:38:54 Error: IMAP(xxxxxxx): Maildir /home/x/xxxxxxx/Maildir sync: UIDVALIDITY changed (1183406107 -> 1183999134)

I'm reading the wiki et el. regarding indexes, but can't come up with a coherent answer to the setup and what will happen. I want to take the indexes and move them off of NFS (~/Maildir) and place in /var/spool/dovecot/indexes, but not have to hand create everything (user homes, mail folders) So, I create a parent folder /var/spool/dovecot/indexes that has the appropriate permissions

Playing with the new idxview I got this error running against my INBOX dovecot.index.cache file. What exactly does it mean? Full output: # /usr/libexec/dovecot/idxview dovecot.index.cache -- INDEX: dovecot.index.cache version = 1.8 base header size = 0 header size = 1170103198 record size = 1170103283 compat flags = 7 index id = 0 flags = 26512 uid validity = 0 next uid = 2460778624 messages

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, for a nice v1.0 release, there are some glitches in the example: 1) # allow shell access for users. See doc/configuration.txt for more information. #valid_chroot_dirs = There is no "doc/configuration.txt" (anymore) 2) spots like: #login_executable = /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login The path is where the file belongs to in a

Hi I am trying to do a staged migration over to dovecot, but having troubles at the first hurdle. I setup the proxy feature to redirect most of our users back to the current Courier imap/pop server, and it's partly working, but I'm getting some serious errors using Thunderbird and IMAP. Now, I had expected the proxying to be fairly transparent and basically just dovecot doing an

hello all, i am trying to rpmbuild samba source 3.0.11-1 and ran into this error and can not figure out what is wrong. the follow error as follows libads/kerberos_keytab.c: In function `ads_keytab_flush'': libads/kerberos_keytab.c:429: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See

I'm trying to recompile the source RPM from the FC3 version of cvs (http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/3/i386/SRPMS.updates/cvs-1.11.17-4.src.rpm), as the version shipped on RHEL/CentOS/etc has a known bug (version 1.11.2-unix "cvs watch on" doesn't work). The initial configure is failing with this obscure error: configure:2257: checking for C compiler default output file

Here's a strange one. I have a user who's using Thunderbird 2.0.0 and assigning multiple tags (keywords) to emails, which are getting "lost" (I'll explain) when he leaves the folder and comes back. I can reproduce this on *his* account myself, but cannot reproduce it on *my* account (separate new TBird 2.0.0 profiles on Windows XP). Use the two TBird default tags

Hi all! I am trying to get dovecot-1.0.rc15 to create files with mode 660 in my virtual mailboxes. I set umask=0007 in dovecot.conf, restarted dovecot (/etc/init.d/dovecot restart) and send me an e-mail but it is still 600. "dovecot -n" says "umask: 7" How come the zeros are not displayed? Is this by intention or is something wrong? Here is the complete output: #

Dovecot version: 1.0.rc7 OS: Red Hat Fedora Core 6 CPU: x86 Filesystem: Linux I have recently upgraded from Fedora Core 4 to Fedora Core 6 (the FC6 was a clean install, not an upgrade). Prior to the upgrade, I used Dovecot to handle IMAP email that talked to Outlook clients. After the FC6 install and copying the .imap* files to the newly recreated user accounts, Outlook is not seeing the

I have a need to use the unsupported kernel for one feature only (AFP/Appletalk support). Never having had to use it before, I''m unsure of what''s all in it other than reading it''s config file. From those that do use it -- is it considered stable enough to use in lightweight production? I''m debating the use of it versus wasting my time rebuilding the normal

One of the changes my beta testers are testing is switching from NIS to LDAP for login/auth/homedir lookups; all is working perfectly, Dovecot + PAM/nss_ldap is A-OK. No issues here, we've been using LDAP lookups on other servers for years. I'm wondering about load, specifically if when I switch the entire company over, will the new authentication load stress my LDAP server to the