similar to: Question About Rsync and Modification Times

You are using rsync -a which copies (preserves) the timestamp. Meaning that rsync will copy the file then back-date it to the timestamp of the source file. Most copying tools do not do this though cp's -a does it too. Note that your itemized output says that the timestamp is different meaning that the file has changed since rsync last ran. Without the -a (or the included -t) the

Hi Kevin, The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of transfer and leaving it that way. Then any time I rerun that command it always updates the timestamp since it is always making it the time of transfer. I have a source file the has a modification date of 2015 and when I rsync it to day with -a the copied

That isn't how rsync should work with -a. Is something preventing it from backdating the file? What is the filesystem? Can you try copying your 2015 file with cp -a? On 10/9/24 14:56, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the > copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of > transfer

I have a Cyber Power LE1000DG UPS I got from Best Buy this weekend. I plan to use it with a TrueNAS scale system, and it is connected via USB. Vendor link: https://www.cyberpowersystems.com/product/ups/battery-backup/le1000dg/. TrueNAS has you pick a UPS driver. I could not find any "LE" related models on https://networkupstools.org/stable-hcl.html (which is the list TrueNAS uses). Per

I have a Smart-UPS RT 3000 XL connected via serial cable to TrueNAS TrueNAS-9.2.1.2-RELEASE-x64 (002022c) which runs on FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p3. When I start the NUT service, I get the message: Oct 20 01:53:50 truenas notifier: very old or unknown APC model, support will be limited Which I interpret as an indicator of less than optimal operating mode. I suspect that the model identifier is not

Really nice write-up on the Samba-based Open Source project ! https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/07/an-easy-mode-for-zfs-we-test-the-truenas-core-12-0-beta/ Congratulations to the FreeNAS/TrueNAS folks ! Jeremy.

Hi, The problem I found is not in what rsync, but on the error handling: How to reproduce: On server side I setup a tree and share using rsync + xinetd, of course, for security reason I use chroot option. Now I push this symlink: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 nov 10 16:28 horsroot -> /bin/ Now I try to do: ./rsync -avPH --copy-unsafe-links draco::test/ /tmp/rsyncdest/ (Of course the

Hi I have a bunch of FreeNAS servers and a TrueNAS HA server all spamming the logs with these messages every minute about their own source name (examples below). These boxes are on two physically separate networks, and I find it unlikely both networks should have some sort of undetected loop. Any ideas on how to debug this? Samba version is 4.1.18. FreeNAS box on network A " Jan 5

I've setup rsync 3.0.0 pre5 on distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr (rsync server) and upload the same into mandriva cooker (development distribution). Someone reported this failure: rsync -auvPH --delete --exclude-from="/home/rfox/exclude.txt" distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr::mandrivalinux/devel/cooker/i586/ . receiving incremental file list rsync: hlink.c:253: check_prior: Assertion

Hi everyone. I'm looking to solve an issue with Samba on a NAS being accessed with TreeSize Pro. Using that program to scan through millions of files is eating up memory on swap and eventually crashing the system. It's scanning mounted CIFS shares on the NAS running TrueNAS with samba version 3.6.9 We have a test case and have been able to replicate the issue on another machine. The

Hello and welcome! Just recently there was a trip down the memory lane with another device with Richcomm-based hardware, and ultimately nutdrv_qx driver happened to support that one: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2395 Some key take-aways were: * try starting the driver with bumped debug verbosity (e.g. from command line, or using a `debug_min` setting with NUT v2.8.0 and

Heya, first time posting to a mailing list so please excuse me if I do something wrong :) I'm new to NUT and trying to get things working on my TrueNAS, I have a "Vultech 1500VA" UPS which comes with the software "PowerManager II" and it seems to be using the "richcomm_usb" driver. There are 5 devices in the compatibility list and I tried all of them, sadly to

Once upon a time, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> said: > The FreeNAS Mini from iX Systems is a good deal more expensive, but > the ones I've worked with have been reliable and well suited to > running ZFS with good performance. I just retired a TrueNAS (the iX Systems "enterprise" version of FreeNAS, on hardware they sold pre-configured), and I don't

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:47 PM Jeremy Allison via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Really nice write-up on the Samba-based > Open Source project ! > > > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/07/an-easy-mode-for-zfs-we-test-the-truenas-core-12-0-beta/ > > Congratulations to the FreeNAS/TrueNAS folks ! > > Jeremy. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this

Greetings - I am trying to document the "value" section of a function. The function returns a list, but the list itself also has attributes. I would like to itemize the list entries, and itemize the attributes, but in between I would like to have a sentence or two about the attributes in general. However, for some reason this intermediate sentence won't show up in the compiled

IIUC, the new philosophy of symlink times is that -t preserves them to the extent that they are settable; when they aren't, it's just as if -t wasn't given. But rsync breaks this principle in the following case. Suppose rsync is configured with HAVE_LUTIMES enabled but the lutimes call doesn't actually work (I simulated this via the attached patch). When rsync recreates a

Once upon a time, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> said: > - They?re serious server-grade machines, not borderline flimsy boxes competing largely on price. Built in and supported from Silicon Valley, not China. :) iXsystems sells rebadged SuperMicro stuff, nothing special (not made in Silicon Valley). We bought an iXsystems TrueNAS (commercial version of FreeNAS +

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 11:48:32PM +0100, Torkil Svensgaard wrote: > Hi > > I have a bunch of FreeNAS servers and a TrueNAS HA server all > spamming the logs with these messages every minute about their own > source name (examples below). > > These boxes are on two physically separate networks, and I find it > unlikely both networks should have some sort of undetected

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 08:11:07AM -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > What does --itemize-changes say about these files? > > Also, what is --atimes? Is this the Apple modified rsync for OSX? > > On 03/28/2016 07:51 AM, Albert Berger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > when the daily system backup with rsync is

On Nov 18, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: > > Once upon a time, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> said: >> - They?re serious server-grade machines, not borderline flimsy boxes competing largely on price. Built in and supported from Silicon Valley, not China. :) > > iXsystems sells rebadged SuperMicro stuff, nothing special (not made