similar to: Question About Rsync and Modification Times

You are using rsync -a which copies (preserves) the timestamp. Meaning that rsync will copy the file then back-date it to the timestamp of the source file. Most copying tools do not do this though cp's -a does it too. Note that your itemized output says that the timestamp is different meaning that the file has changed since rsync last ran. Without the -a (or the included -t) the

Hi Kevin, The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of transfer and leaving it that way. Then any time I rerun that command it always updates the timestamp since it is always making it the time of transfer. I have a source file the has a modification date of 2015 and when I rsync it to day with -a the copied

That isn't how rsync should work with -a. Is something preventing it from backdating the file? What is the filesystem? Can you try copying your 2015 file with cp -a? On 10/9/24 14:56, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the > copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of > transfer

Hello, I?m running TrueNAS 24.10.2.2, which uses Samba 4.20.5-truenas. I have a mixture of Mac, Linux, and Windows SMB clients in my network that talk to the TrueNAS server over SMB. Apologies in advance for the slightly long-winded setup to my question; I wanted to explain how I got here. I?d like to be able to use Server-Side Copy (SSC) (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Server-Side_Copy)

There are two styles of SSC: - the "normal" protocol style called copy-chunk, where the copy is requested in IO ranges by the client and performed server-side - the Apple way enabled by fruit:copyfile where the client requests the *whole* file to be copied in one request to be performed by the server The problem with the latter is that for large file the copy takes some time and

I have a Cyber Power LE1000DG UPS I got from Best Buy this weekend. I plan to use it with a TrueNAS scale system, and it is connected via USB. Vendor link: https://www.cyberpowersystems.com/product/ups/battery-backup/le1000dg/. TrueNAS has you pick a UPS driver. I could not find any "LE" related models on https://networkupstools.org/stable-hcl.html (which is the list TrueNAS uses). Per

I have a Smart-UPS RT 3000 XL connected via serial cable to TrueNAS TrueNAS-9.2.1.2-RELEASE-x64 (002022c) which runs on FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p3. When I start the NUT service, I get the message: Oct 20 01:53:50 truenas notifier: very old or unknown APC model, support will be limited Which I interpret as an indicator of less than optimal operating mode. I suspect that the model identifier is not

Hi, The problem I found is not in what rsync, but on the error handling: How to reproduce: On server side I setup a tree and share using rsync + xinetd, of course, for security reason I use chroot option. Now I push this symlink: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 nov 10 16:28 horsroot -> /bin/ Now I try to do: ./rsync -avPH --copy-unsafe-links draco::test/ /tmp/rsyncdest/ (Of course the

Really nice write-up on the Samba-based Open Source project ! https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/07/an-easy-mode-for-zfs-we-test-the-truenas-core-12-0-beta/ Congratulations to the FreeNAS/TrueNAS folks ! Jeremy.

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:32:03 +0100 Carlos Alberto Balseiro Mayi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > ? > HI everyone. > > I've been analyzing a problem with an embedded Linux/FPGA device that > in some cases was failing to run properly when using files from a > samba share. After some time I've found it is related to Samba bug > 12783 and setting

These are a combination of "temp" and "real" files. The user is deleting/moving PDFs, InDesign and image files. I'm presuming hidden files are also getting deleted when the real files are. The filesystem has been solid (XFS) up until the switch to SMB. From: itdept_head <itdept_head at grown-up.com> To: Cc: "samba at lists.samba.org" <samba at

? HI everyone. I've been analyzing a problem with an embedded Linux/FPGA device that in some cases was failing to run properly when using files from a samba share. After some time I've found it is related to Samba bug 12783 and setting kernel oplocks on global fix the issue. But while looking at that I have found a strange behavior I can't understand. I have guest ok = yes on the

Hi I have a bunch of FreeNAS servers and a TrueNAS HA server all spamming the logs with these messages every minute about their own source name (examples below). These boxes are on two physically separate networks, and I find it unlikely both networks should have some sort of undetected loop. Any ideas on how to debug this? Samba version is 4.1.18. FreeNAS box on network A " Jan 5

Thanks a lot for your analysis. I just wanted to add that I think we are not using at all? The client is an embedded Linux/FPGA machine and it doesn't have mount.cifs . I think it is using https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LinuxCIFSKernel . It comes default with kernel 5.15 but I tried with a 6.10 and same problem happens. Best Regards, Carlos A. Balseiro El 2025-01-18 11:32, Rowland

I've setup rsync 3.0.0 pre5 on distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr (rsync server) and upload the same into mandriva cooker (development distribution). Someone reported this failure: rsync -auvPH --delete --exclude-from="/home/rfox/exclude.txt" distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr::mandrivalinux/devel/cooker/i586/ . receiving incremental file list rsync: hlink.c:253: check_prior: Assertion

Hi everyone. I'm looking to solve an issue with Samba on a NAS being accessed with TreeSize Pro. Using that program to scan through millions of files is eating up memory on swap and eventually crashing the system. It's scanning mounted CIFS shares on the NAS running TrueNAS with samba version 3.6.9 We have a test case and have been able to replicate the issue on another machine. The

Hello and welcome! Just recently there was a trip down the memory lane with another device with Richcomm-based hardware, and ultimately nutdrv_qx driver happened to support that one: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2395 Some key take-aways were: * try starting the driver with bumped debug verbosity (e.g. from command line, or using a `debug_min` setting with NUT v2.8.0 and

Heya, first time posting to a mailing list so please excuse me if I do something wrong :) I'm new to NUT and trying to get things working on my TrueNAS, I have a "Vultech 1500VA" UPS which comes with the software "PowerManager II" and it seems to be using the "richcomm_usb" driver. There are 5 devices in the compatibility list and I tried all of them, sadly to

Tripp-Lite SMARTINT2200VS TRUENAS Shell: root at truenas[~]# upsc ups battery.charge: 100 battery.voltage: 54.40 battery.voltage.nominal: 48 device.mfr: Tripp Lite device.model: TRIPP LITE SMARTINT2200S device.type: ups driver.name: tripplite_usb driver.parameter.pollinterval: 10 driver.parameter.port: /dev/uhid0 driver.parameter.synchronous: no driver.version: 2.7.4 driver.version.internal:

Once upon a time, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> said: > The FreeNAS Mini from iX Systems is a good deal more expensive, but > the ones I've worked with have been reliable and well suited to > running ZFS with good performance. I just retired a TrueNAS (the iX Systems "enterprise" version of FreeNAS, on hardware they sold pre-configured), and I don't