similar to: little submissions feature request

Hi everybody, we're currently in the process of drafting our new mailserver-setup. Instead of a single-server-setup we'd like to have two equal servers behind a loadbalancer like LVS and shared mailhomes on NFS. We'd like to use dovecot for POP/IMAP, dovecot-deliver as LDA. - It's probably the best idea to direct SMTP and POP/IMAP always to the same server behind the

I''m trying to set up the Depot app from Agile Web Development and I got this error after C1 - Creating a Cart. The exact error looks like this: ------------------------------------------------------------------- NoMethodError in StoreController#add_to_cart You have a nil object when you didn''t expect it! You might have expected an instance of Array. The error occurred while

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1736 Bug ID: 1736 Summary: nftables - dynamic update for verdict map from the packet path Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

Hi, I have question i have loadbalancer that's connects every x seconds to my pop3 and Imap to see if it's still working. Every time it connects I see its ip is there a way to say don't log ip x.x.x.x ? With kind regards, Bas van den Dikkenberg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:50:16PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: > you should avoid this > one solution is to use loadbalancers with persistance We had been using a loadbalancer with persistence to reduce the problems, and today I switched to everything running on a single box to avoid any cross-node contention. Unfortunately, the problem still happens, even when they were all running

Hi all, I've 4 servers with dovecot and ldap authentication behind a loadbalancer (Alteon). To connect to dovecot, client need to use a vip of the loadbalancer. To connect to the ldap server, dovecot need to use the loadbalancer cause there are several ldap server. The loadbalancer close a connection without activity during 30mn Dovecot lauch several authentication process who have

Hi all, i''m having a somewhat stupid problem I can''t get rid of. we''ve a server that accepts incoming world connections from a load balancer (10.10.10.4) to port 80, and we still want to serve incoming ssh/http from the firewall (10.10.10.1) routed to this host (10.10.10.90) and their reply packets of cause shall be send out through the firewall. unfortunately, both

Hi Anyone know of there is an rpm available for this? Trying to build a loadbalancer from the LVS project for a webserver farm and struggling with ipvsadm <http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/kernel-2.6/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm> on 4.2 thanks

Hi Friends I am facing an issue with dovecot configuration and i am describing it in a nutshell. We have a dovecot setup under ultramonkey load balancer and in loadbalancer we have a check defined for pop service which queries mysqldatabase for a particular user name/password after every 2 minutes to check if service is live or not.. Things are fine till here . Now The catch is if somehow that

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:05:46 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 20 Nov 2017, at 10.50, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: > > > > AFAIK no complex director stuff would be needed then, right? > > The second sentence implies that using file locking should also be enough, > > which dovecot does. >

We like to set up our mail system in two datacenters but the wiki<https://wiki.dovecot.org/Replication> says "Shared folder replication doesn't work correctly..." I'm thinking about using an external loadbalancer to ensure that only one host will get connections. Normal operations: client ==imap=> loadbalancer ==imap=> host1 ==replication=> host2 Host1 or

Hello Mongrels, Building on the last messages about Fastthread, can we get a detailed survey of the different ways people are deploying their applications? It will help with near-future Mongrel development. Please include the following things: * Framework, if any (Camping, Merb, Rails, Nitro, Ramaze, IOWA, Rack...) * Mongrel version * Mongrel handlers used (rails, dirhandler, camping,

> I have 2 test servers with the below configuration. > > ========================== > Linux OS - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > Dovecot version - 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63) > Postfix version - 2.10.1 > ========================== > > Trying to create High Availability. > > I have added both of the above servers behind a F5 load

Il 16/07/20 12:40, Gerald Galster ha scritto: >> Some missing infos... >> >> - As load balancer I'm using a pair of keepalived with simple setup and >> not the DNS >> - Load balancer algorithm is "Weighted Least-Connection" >> - About 20 domains and 3000 email >> - I'm monitoring my backend servers with poolmon >> - The backend

Hello, I have finished setting up the load balancer with IPROUTE ... also patch the kernel to support DGD and now it''s working fine with the valuable guide at LARTC website, Julian Anastasov, and the kind people in this mailing list. Now I would like to launch a web server and a ftp server to the public but I''m stuck into a problem and really need your help. Currently internal

Hello Zed ! I''ve experimented a simple but limited performance tweak in the mongrel rails loader. With the following apache 2.2 mod proxy loadbalancer setup : # Redirect all non-static requests to cluster RewriteCond %{DOCUMENT_ROOT}/%{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ balancer://mongrel_cluster%{REQUEST_URI} [P,QSA,L] We can assume that mongrel is called only when the

Hi! I''ve been using Mongrel in a Rails setup with HAProxy as a loadbalancer. I used to use Pound, but HAProxy is much more performant and has the very nice option to limit the amount of requests sent to the backend servers/processes. In practice, this means that a new incoming request will not be sent to a Mongrel that''s already busy processing a request. There''s

Hi list, We, an OSS advocacy group, setup a Xen 3.1 machine composed of : . a 64 bits dom0 running Debian stable amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running OpenBSD amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running NetBSD i386 This machine is to be hosted and reachable from the Internet, but it will only have one public IP. Naturally, our first tought was to port-forward using iptables / netfilter. We didn''t really

Hello All, We are struggling to find a solution to a problem we are encountering with a load-balanced email setup. Currently, we have a Coyote loadbalancer, and 3 Postfix/Dovecot nodes that then get their information from a mysql database. The problem is that after a couple weeks, we start seeing NFS locking issues occur, which then takes email completely down, requiring a site visit to

Hello, Attempting to setup a CA primary/standby as well as seperate puppetmaster servers (all running Apache/Passenger) behind another Apache/Passenger type load balancer. Clients are not getting certs:- err: Could not request certificate: Could not intern from s: nested asn1 error Clearly an SSL issue but not something I know a great deal about. loadbalancer.conf # Puppet Load Balancing