similar to: 1.1b13 build

On Dec 22, 2007, at 5:00 AM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: (stuff cut out) > Message: 10 > Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:12:30 +0200 > From: arvids <arvids at mpe.lv> > Subject: [Dovecot] v1.1.beta12 deliver crashes > To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> > Message-ID: <200712221112.30760.arvids at mpe.lv> > Content-Type: text/plain;

On Jan 20, 2008, at 12:15 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:48:09 +0200 > From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> > Subject: [Dovecot] v1.1.beta14 released > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: <1200836889.12450.99.camel at hurina> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >

On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:48 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: > > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 20:29:49 +0200 > From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> > Subject: [Dovecot] v1.1.beta11 released > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: <1197224989.922.405.camel at hurina> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >

In running the various 1.0.n versions of Dovecot's LDA with the instructions in the wiki for using LDA with Postfix [on OS X 10.4] things went well using the instructions as-is (no setuid problems). This changed in moving over to the 1.1 beta. The LDA refused to work failing with the error "setgroups() failed: Operation not permitted" as I mentioned in a previous message.

Some preamble information? OS X 10.4.10 (all updates) Power Mac Dual G5, 2.0 Postfix with Dovecot SASL, Dovecot LDA, Dovecot imaps (openssl) Mail clients Apple Mail v 2.1 SquirrelMail v 1.4.10a Thunderbird v 2.0.0.6 Mulberry v 4.06 For various versions of Dovecot, from 0.9m up through 1.0.3 things went well, no memorable big problems, with one exception: Mulberry v 4.0.8 would/will not

From the digest: On Aug 14, 2007, at 1:04 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: other messages cut out? > > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:03:58 +0200 > From: martin f krafft <madduck at madduck.net> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] use of deliver from procmail advisable? > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: <20070814170358.GA17390 at

On Nov 28, 2007, at 10:59 AM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: > Message: 8 > Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 07:49:13 -0800 > From: snowcrash <schneecrash+dovecot at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] 1.1beta9 'make' fails on osx/Tiger, but OK on > osx/Leopard (multiple definitions of symbol _hash_create) > To: "Timo Sirainen" <tss at iki.fi> >

On Oct 16, 2007, at 6:05 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: (various messages snipped) > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:14:04 -0700 > From: Bill Landry <bill at inetmsg.com> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Squirrelmail Problem with 1.1 Beta 3 > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: <47150D7C.6040409 at

On Nov 2, 2007, at 9:48 AM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:00:56 +0100 > From: spammy <spam at rogerp.org> > Subject: [Dovecot] Postfix and Dovecot Deliver LDA > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: <472B1178.2060200 at rogerp.org> > Content-Type: text/plain;

asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com wrote: > Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:38:04 +1000 > From: Rob Hillis <rob@hillis.dyndns.org> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Softphone that supports central > provisioning? > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: <462B2CFC.50709@hillis.dyndns.org>

Hi list, I understand that dovecot's deliver does a little more than deliver: it also updates the dovecot metadata stored with each Maildir. Thus, if I use deliver as opposed to procmail's internal Maildir delivery, it seems that the IMAP server later has less work to do since the metadata is can use are up to date. Doing this, however, incurs an extra process for each mail delivered. I

(Yes, Really .... w/ gcc v4.2.1, like i said in the first place) > Actually, the 1.1 beta v9 builds just fine under Tiger (PPC and > PPC64) if you use the official Apple sanctioned gcc v 4.01 they ship > with both Tiger and Leopard. If you do download and use gcc 4.2.1 from > the GNU folks you might want to pass along the error / bug reports to > them instead of Apple, but I

Also check the top of Authentication processes section: ## ## Authentication processes ## # Executable location auth_executable = /path/to/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-auth -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2447 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Branislav Baca wrote the following: Hello, I'm using postfix(2.4.5) and dovecot(1.0.5), and till now I have been using postfix deliver agent. Now I have tried to reconfigure postfix to use the dovecot LDA, but I'm getting some strange error: Try this: socket listen { master { path = /path/to/run/dovecot/auth-master mode = 0600 user =

Just a quick note: The new 1.1-b6 is working fine on OS X 10.5. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2447 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071105/a710e0ea/attachment-0002.bin>

Hi list, it's been 2 months now since my initial posting (s.b.). I wonder if I could get at least a "still working on it" statement from the devs or something like that? On 22.02.2018 16:42, Patrick Cernko wrote: > Hi list, > > this question was already posted a few years ago > (https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-November/098585.html). I > already asked the

>>> From: Bill Cole <dovecot-20061108 at billmail.scconsult.com> (stuff cut out) > > That looks like a bug. A program that calls setgroups() must be > running as root. It seems to me that a code path leading to such a > call should probably be able to identify that issue before the call > and provide a better failure message than translating EPERM into its >

Hello, when receiving mails for multiple recipients via LMTP, I often see the following messages on our servers: > May 22 11:06:10 sinon dovecot[44304]: lmtp(119718): Connect from $IP$ > May 22 11:06:11 sinon dovecot[44304]: lmtp($USER1$)<119718><2HnmOgIR5Vym0wEA22L5Rg>: msgid=<$MSGID$>: saved mail to INBOX > May 22 11:06:11 sinon dovecot[44304]:

On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 13:21 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 16:12 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > > > > >/ <------------> > > />/ ?[Jul 21 12:53:56] NOTICE[4881]: chan_sip.c:16416 handle_request_invite: > > / Call from 'devcentos5x64_to_ebox4300' to extension > > 'mediaport_audio_visual' rejected

I have reported on bugzilla, link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943399; But this seems to only support ovirt. Then?opened an issue on CentOS community;link: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=18131; Thanks. jasonrao From: centos-virt-request Date: 2021-03-16 20:00 To: centos-virt Subject: CentOS-virt Digest, Vol 159, Issue 2 Send CentOS-virt mailing list submissions to