similar to: Dovecot 1.08 seems very slow

Hello, we're experiencing an odd issue after combining two vDisks used for mail storage into one big new LVM. We've done this in the past successfully and didn't experience a lot of problems. We stopped all services (dovecot/postfix) to ensure that mailbox contents (Maildir) will not be changed, rsynch'ed the mail to the new disks and restarted everything. When we restarted

Hi All, I've got a brand new dovecot installation. I'm new to dovecot, so please be gentle :-) Anyway, I'm getting some errors when I try to connect to dovecot. I've tried searching the web and haven't been able to find a lot of information. Here's the config info: # dovecot --version 1.1.2 # dovecot -n sudo dovecot -n # 1.1.2: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf base_dir:

I have an Infortrend RAID box I'd like to see as one big 6TB partition, but I only can get 2.2TB partitions to work. I was trying to do this with an Adaptec controller but apparently they are only (any of them) 48 bits wide. Does anybody have a working system for SCSI/Centos over 2.2TB? Milt Mallory Topix.com 650-461-8316 Always consider the issues of progressive enhancement and

Hi. I had to update the BIOS of a Silicon Image 3512A Serial ATA controller. I''m not using RAID. When I run the updater program (updflash.exe), it asks me to choose flash memory from a list, something like: AMD Am29F010B (1 Megabit), AMD Am29LV01B (1 Megabit), etc. How can I find out which is flash memory of the controller? Thanks Marcelo

There used to be a CUI tool to configure printers from a server without X running. Is there still that tool but renamed to something else? Or do you have to use VNC and X to remotely configure printers starting with 5.x?

Hello all this is my first post to this list so i would like to than you all in advance for your time and consideration. I am in the process of building a new server and have purchased some used hardware. There seems to be some hardware issuses and i am hoping nothing was damaged during shipping. However i am in contact with intel and we are tring to figure out the exact problem via email. So

Hi, i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on my thinkpad . i have enough ram ie 2 gb and good processor Core 2 duo.2.5 ghz T9300 evrey thing seems to be running very slow. any help would be welcome thanx Sumit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear All, I need CentOS 4.4 and RHEL4 Update 3 Step-by-Step Text Mode Installation Screen Shots. Please send me the following Installation Screen Shots Details or link Regards -S.Balaji

Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Thank you, Best regards, Adrian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3092 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080831/2ebe58b8/attachment-0005.bin>

Dear All, I have been using centos 5.1 for quite some time as out DNS and mail server and been workin fine i use sendmail as my mail server i did setup a backup mail server as per docs and ran th dns test from http://www.checkdns.net and it says both the mail servers are fine but i would like to know the following how would i really know if my main primary server is down all my mails r goin

Why are there so many Fedora 6 packages in CentOS 5? Are there something wrong with the build system? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5766 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070413/2a65a831/attachment-0004.bin>

i (and others) have missed messages on centos-devel as well. did other people not see the 4.7 announcement message? i'm wondering if the centos list server is having some kind of issue.

I have had this problem on and off since RedHat 6, and I always worked through it, but I thought I would ask. When you have multiple network interfaces, how does the system determine the default route? Or is it the first, (or last) interface that comes up? On the problem systems I have to add a "route add default..." statement in some systems in the rc.local to get them to work right.

Hi, VMWare has been a great tool for me to experiment with CentOS 3 and CentOS 4. However, I'm running into issues with CentOS 5. First, it is *extremely* slow to boot (as in it takes over an hour to boot CentOS 5 on a machine that boots CentOS 3 & 4 in less than one minute). Then, after an hour of slowly watching the messages go by on the console and the CPU of the host machine pegged

Hi, ive walked into a enviroment where the previous admin has being using pop and making the email clients leaving a copy of the mail on the workstation.. Now overtime these mailboxes (mbox format) have grown between 1,5 to 1,8 Gigs large I want to convert all these mailbox to IMAP (only 15) and want to know whats the largested suggest folder size per user dovecot IMAP runs smoothly with

We currently had dovecote 99 running and ran into some issues with it, mainly our pop3 sessions timeout and were slow. I upgraded to the latest version and im serving imap with pop3 using pam. Heres my pam file: [root at pop etc]# cat /etc/pam.d/dovecot #%PAM-1.0 auth required pam_unix.so nullok account required pam_unix.so The problem I'm having is I can authenticate to

Environment: - CentOS 5.1, - Apache 2.2.3 - php 5.1.6 - phpMyAdmin 2.11.6 - MySQL 5.0.22 Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products. All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an error: "Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server". I'll forgo all the paths I followed trying to get this to work and cut

Hi, I've just turned from Fedora Core to Centos 5, And would like to know the 'official' way/mechanism to upgrade a bunch of Centos 5 machines. My basic situation is: hundred of machines will be installed with Centos 5.0 by means of kickstart. and then the machines will always uses Centos 5.0 kickstart images for initial installation, not Centos 5.1, Centos 5.2, etc. So my

Hi, the latest upstream version of samba rpms for 5.2 is samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1. In the Centos 5.2 updates tree there is only samba-3.0.28-0.el5.8 which also is already part of the 5.2 os tree. Could it be that the updates tree just carries the wrong rpms? Best regards, Bernd

In centos 4 we used tail in the following way: tail +83 file That would tail the contents of the file starting at line 83. In centos 5 that same command complains about the file +83 not being found. It appears that the + option in tail doesn't work the same way in centos 5. Is there another easy way to grab the contents of a file starting at a certain line number and beyond.