similar to: procmail/formail --> Maildir

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1400 matches similar to: "procmail/formail --> Maildir"

2013 Feb 25
1
Procmail/Formail problem on 6.3
Hi! In the process of making mysystem work again, having just done a reinstall of 6.3 x86_64. I have a considerable collection of procmail recipes for filtering mail in various ways, and since the upgrade none of 'em is working. procmail passes every mail thru spambayes, which gives back a rating on spamminess. this happens, so it's not as if procmail is simply punting. that is
2009 Feb 02
1
OT: procmail recipe question
I'm trying to use procmail and I'm having trouble getting it to set some headers. I have one mailing list that sets ?Newsgroups: in the header and I want to remove it. I have the following test recipe: :0 * ^Subject:.*\<testing * ^(Mime-Version:|Content-) | formail -IMime-Version: -IContent- If I understand it correctly, it should remove the Mime-Verion and Content headers. The
2009 May 17
0
procmail & formail
Dear all, i have a mail server & vpopmail. Now, i want to copy from each message to a directory.i find a way to do it. i put following line in .qmail-default : |formail -X "" > ~/text.txt Of course above line is test.Given line doesn't retrieves Return* header field. My question: How i retrieve entire email same itslef? Yours, Mohsen
2009 Mar 13
1
procmail recipe
hi all I am trying to filter emails to a user (weather) based on the subject: :0 *^Subject:.*Weather | /usr/bin/formail | /path/to/executable *^Subject:.*Tornado | /usr/bin/formail | /path/to/executable All it does is deliver the email to the weather inbox. For testing I tried. echo 1 | mail -s "Tornado" weather Enabling verbose and log file gives me: From root at
2009 Oct 17
3
Wish-list: X-Delivered-To headers generated by dovecot-deliver
Would it be sensible/"cost effective" to make dovecot-deliver generated X-Delivered-To header(s) based on command line parameter(s)? [after striping such existing headers, before consulting sieve] I need it to: a) *clearly* mark POP/IMAP account fetched by fetchmail [with fetchmail using directly dovecot-deliver in --mda option] b) cleanly implement "shared mailboxes" with
2007 Jun 07
2
procmail, and the care and feeding of mailing list content received
Some threads just go on too long. Personally I think a troll has hijacked the main centos list again and is inducing food fight behaviours while that troll perfectly 'innocently' asserting that it is just respoding to all email. see: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645 for a discussion of the problem of 'capture' in FOSS projects. But if one loses
2015 Oct 28
2
sieve vacation - 2 questions
Hello, still trying to move from procmail to sieve, but there are new problems. Currently we use procmail for autoresponder and let user choose timerange, in which responder should work. May be you set up today your responder for 2 weeks in future where responder start and stop automatically without further manuell intervention. In procmail this is done by simple scripting and comparison of
2008 Sep 17
5
Converting from MBOX to Maildir broke procmail and Spamassasin and halted incoming mail
I could use some help here - As I use Dovecot I started here when trying to figure out why I could not add new mail folders under my Mac's Mail program, but could under Thunderbird. It was quickly pointed out that my system was set up to use MBOX and not MAILDIR, and some helpful links and notes were sent back and forth giving me a good clue as to how to perform the conversion
2018 Feb 24
6
Really slow IMAP performance
Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> writes: >> On 24 February 2018 at 15:47 Neil Jerram <neil at ossau.homelinux.net> wrote: [...] >> > Feb 24 10:24:24 arudy dovecot[1712]: imap(neil): Warning: >> > Transaction log file >> > /home/neil/dovecot-mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.log was locked >> > for 98 seconds (Mailbox was synchronized) [...]
2014 Jun 28
2
Procmail to Sieve translation
Hello, I'm trying to move from procmail to dovecot sieve. I found the translation script at http://www.dovecot.org/tools/procmail2sieve.pl It works well except the following use cases: * ^From:.*myemail at mydomain.com.* | formail -I"X-Priority: 2 (high)" -I"X-mydomain-com-seen: yes" | $SENDMAIL -oi \ myemail at mydomain2.com \ myemail at mydomain3.com :0c *
2014 Aug 14
1
Segfault with indexer-worker using Tika/Solr
Using Dovecot 2.2.13 with Tika 1.5 on Centos 5 64bit Tika is throwing an exception for some reason, which seems to be causing Dovecot's indexer to segfault. I'm using mdbox/gzipped compressed mail and private indexes for the shared folder. I'm importing mail via formail/dovecot-lda: formail -s /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d admin -m Public/TestSubFolder? < /tmp/Inbox.mbox
2020 Jun 11
2
Pigeonhole-sieve auto-reply
Is it possible to have a sieve script reply with a press message to certain emails (and only certain emails) based on sieve matches? I see a lot on vacation replies, but I want something more specific. Something along the lines of procmails formail command? Everything I?ve searched for is about vacation r filing replies into the same folder as the original message.
2007 Aug 27
4
processing Dovecot maildirs with shell scripts
Hello, I have a postfix server which uses procmail as its delivery agent to deliver incoming messages to several maildirs. For several reasons, not really relevant here, I need to process/refilter/sort again the content of these mailboxes before delivering the messages to the _other_ maildirs which Dovecot sees and serves to local or remote imap users. Basically, I need to write some shell
2003 Aug 10
7
More about Accounting
I should also mention that Accounting rules are not stateful -- each rule only handles traffic in one direction. So for example, if eth0 is your internet interface and you have a web server in your DMZ connected to eth1 then to measure HTTP traffic in both directions requires two rules: DONE eth0 eth1 tcp 80 DONE eth1 eth0 tcp - 80 Associating a counter with a chain allows for aggregation.
2012 Jul 12
3
ot: execute a script via email?
anyone has any tips what's best way to execute a script via email ? I have a wget script that fetches some pages, and, emails me the output, there is no paramters passed, it's all in the script I'll like to email in and action the script to get the results email -- Voytek
2004 Mar 26
2
The Status: header is forced
Hi, I started testing dovecot for our next POP/IMAP server (nearing production state), and noticed that the Status: header is always added, with a value of 'O' or 'RO'. This happens in `lib-index/mbox/mbox-rewrite.c'. This does not seem to happen in the Maildir case. Is the Status: header really needed in every case? This breaks mutt which displays mails with a 'O'
2007 Nov 22
2
dovecot loading during boot
I have two RHEL4 email servers running postfix/MailScanner which use dovecot. They work great. But during bootup the nfslock script in my init.d loads rpc.statd and calls portmap to get a port number. Portmap keeps giving rpc.statd the imaps port number (993). I then have to stop my mail server services, manually start dovecot, then restart the mail server services and everything goes merrily on
2012 Feb 21
2
duplicates with multiple To/CC and sieve redirect copy
Hi, In one installation we are using sieve "redirect :copy" to create copy of the incoming email (local boss gets copy of its employees mails). There is a problem when the incoming email has multiple To/CC entries with local users. Multiple copy/redirects are created (one for each employee) and there are multiple copies in "boss" account. Each of this emails has the same
2014 Jun 11
1
Asterisk 12 AMI Hold Event
I'm trying to capture when a call is placed on and removed from being on hold through the AMI in Asterisk 12.3. In previous versions, the Hold event contained a 'Status' field which indicated if the call was going 'On' or 'Off' hold. However, in 12 not only am I not seeing the Status field, but I am not seeing any AMI Hold event that corresponds to removing the call
2009 Jun 11
3
How to reply to a digest
I'm receiving the centos-request in digest mode. Using Fedora 10 and Evolution. When I tried to reply to a centos-request message inside the digest, the result doesn't seem to look right. I cut/paste the proper subject line (replacing the CentOS Digest, Vol NN, Issue nn text), but some have complained that this approach doesn't allow the original question and replies to be threaded.