similar to: Server Push, with Active MQ?

I''m working on the plugin for RBatis and a new little thing I''m toying around with called ActiveMessaging (sorry, David I stole the name from you from the TW AwayDay ;-)). Anyway, in both these applications I want to be able to have reloadable classes that don''t extend any of the standard built in ones. So, I don''t mean to offend the Eminent Core Members by

Hi all I am working on a heavy engineering project. And the requirement is that I needto do a lot of process before I store the data to the db. Now the question is that I want to do the process that I am doing but I want to do it in the background. What I actually mean to say is that..I just want the user to get a msg that Records Saved. But in real I want the process to go on in background.

I''m trying to install mcollective on an environment for the first time and I''m having troubles: MC client (also the puppet master) activemq.xml <!-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. The

Im new to puppet and installed it in my home lab to mess with, when i installed it i used the hostname rather than FQDN so went back and changed puppet and reran the certificate tool to regenerate the certificates etc, the agent works fine now but i am getting an mccollective error i think, is there anything in the config i need to change for mccollective after altering the name to the FQDN?

I am currently trying to get mcollective 2.2.4 up and running on RHEL 6 activeqm appears to be running and bound to the correct port, I see the server and client connections to the activemq box. However when I run mco ping all "seems to go well" except I get "No responses recieved" and above that I get the following log messages, debug 2013/05/29 17:02:12: activemq.rb:233:in

Can anybody tell me what exactly ActiveMQ does? Is it a storage of messages produced by producer and ready to consume by consumer? M i understanding it correctly or not? Please tell me? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Hi all, I want to Connect to IBM MQ from Rails/Ruby, can it be done? and get the messages from the Queue, then i want to use this message in ruby/rails. Is there a direct way of doing the above job?? If so any packages are available? If there is not a way currently, and any thoughts of how we can do the above job indirectly through some other means or round about ways or workarounds can be

I have a puppet server and various puppet agents. I want to do mcollective stuff. So please anyone tell me what should i install on puppet server and agent to run mcollective? Is there any need to install ActiveMQ also and where should i install it? Thanks in advance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe

Hi everyone, I run MCollective 1.2.1 together with ActiveMQ 5.5 under Scientific Linux 6.1 on Amazon EC2. Overall it works like a charm, but sometimes (eg. 1/30) discovery fails. Still the exit-code of mco will be 0, which is a problem for me as I use MCollective e.g. to trigger deployments from Jenkins. I would like to ask for some feedback on the following ideas, that could fix this problem.

I'm trying to make my github processing better, but I'm missing something. I have the following: if address :all :contains "from" ["github.com"] { addflag "github"; addflag "MyFlags" "github"; set "mailbox" "GitHub"; if address :matches :user "to" "*" { set "GHUser"

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 11:12 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm not sure I agree with the no-code standard. I agree with minimal code, but I think an incubator should be established enough to be discussed concretely (e.g. "what is" vs "ideals"). > > I hear what you’re saying, but I think we can handle this as part of

Hi, I am writing scripts for deployment of our software and I am also using MCollective on linux. I hope to use MCollective in order to reduce the requirement of opening a putty session to each VM and running the puppet agent manually the first time (when its registers/ creates keys etc). The problem I see with this is that I need to log in to each machine and install/configure mcollective

This looks to be a reasonable starting point. A couple of nit picks, none are blockers. 1. I'd hold off on handing out the sub-domain for the moment. This feels more official than we probably want for a random incubator.  I reserve the right to change my mind here, but maybe we should delay this part until we see what actual incubators look like?  As an alternative, maybe

Hi All, I have a working installation of a Puppet Master (CA) with Puppet agents, this using The Foreman. I really see the usage of Puppet this way but because The Foreman supports pushing your classes/templates to you nodes (agents) and uses the depricated Run/Kick for it I''m looking into Mcollective. Mcollective is supported by The Foreman since 1.2, the version I''m

Hi all, I''ve been looking at a potential problem, as documented here: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/19241 To do with a leak within the KahaDB persistence layer of ActiveMQ. Specifically, there are reports of the db.data file growing unbounded: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3956 I''m hoping to find out information from other PuppetDB users to see if this is

I''ve been trying to find information, suggestions, etc. for how to combine scaling Puppet with the use of management tools like Dashboard/Foreman and MCollective. Our current thinking for an initial deployment is two VMs as Puppet Master worker nodes fronted by a pair of NetScalers. However, I''m not sure how to go about implementing Dashboard or Foreman and MCollective servers in

I''ve been thinking a lot about running mcollective on my production servers recently, especially about its nice integration with puppet (using facts and so on). However I''ve got some concern about its scalability - how publish/subscribe middleware scales in terms of speed and flooding the network. I run about 2000 servers. Has anyone got any experience running mcollective on

hyperv_net: - set min/max_mtu virtio_net: - set min/max_mtu - remove virtnet_change_mtu vmxnet3: - set min/max_mtu CC: netdev at vger.kernel.org CC: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org CC: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys at microsoft.com> CC: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> CC: Shrikrishna Khare

hyperv_net: - set min/max_mtu virtio_net: - set min/max_mtu - remove virtnet_change_mtu vmxnet3: - set min/max_mtu CC: netdev at vger.kernel.org CC: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org CC: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys at microsoft.com> CC: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> CC: Shrikrishna Khare

From: Aaron Conole <aconole at bytheb.org> The virtio committee recently ratified a change, VIRTIO-152, which defines the mtu field to be 'max' MTU, not simply desired MTU. This commit brings the virtio-net device in compliance with VIRTIO-152. Additionally, drop the max_mtu branch - it cannot be taken since the u16 returned by virtio_cread16 will never exceed the initial value of