similar to: Plans for 1.1beta14 release?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Plans for 1.1beta14 release?"

2008 Feb 06
1
imap fs quota (rpc) won't work?
In the past I dabbled with the imap quota plugin with the fs backend because I wanted to report usage to my users (not limit them). At the time, the quota plugin would make dovecot crash when trying to write to a folder (I can bring up this report if needed). However, in a later beta of dovecot 1.1 I tried quota again but I cannot get it to report any results. I've been wanting to use
2008 Feb 06
2
(message_parse_header_next): assertion failed:, +(IS_LWSP(line->value[0])) 1.1beta14
I noticed these happen when one of my users searches his Trash folder which he doesn't empty. He uses thunderbird and it is reproducable. Feb 5 22:47:39 boomhauer dovecot: IMAP(username): file message-header-parser.c: line 350 (message_parse_header_next): assertion failed: +(IS_LWSP(line->value[0])) Feb 5 22:47:41 boomhauer dovecot: child 8022 (imap) killed with signal 6 Feb 5
2008 Jan 20
4
v1.1.beta14 released (Compile Error)
On Jan 20, 2008, at 12:15 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:48:09 +0200 > From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> > Subject: [Dovecot] v1.1.beta14 released > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: <1200836889.12450.99.camel at hurina> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >
2007 Nov 17
2
unlink_directory(....Trash.NewFolder) failed: Directory not empty
I noticed the following this week. No idea how long its been happening because I have not tested deleting folders hardly at all. Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a folder "NewFolder", click on it in thunderbird so an index dir is created: ls -ldi Maildir/.NewFolder/ 1504062 drwx------ 5 mcdouga9 egrstaff 4096 Nov 16 19:44 Maildir/.NewFolder/ ls -ldi
2008 Jan 20
1
v1.1.beta14 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta14.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta14.tar.gz.sig School has started since beta13 release and I've been a bit busy with it and trying to get my sleeping times fixed (0-2h sleep doesn't seem to be enough). My interest in algorithms has also grown a bit recently. I'm thinking about majoring in CS /
2007 Oct 21
3
assertion failed: (mailbox_list_is_valid_existing_name(_list, name))
When I was initially testing dovecot 1.1b2,3 I had ACLs turned on and encountered this problem below. I had them turned off until now, I'll need to have ACLs working before I can widen testing. I'm not sure how to make "env MAIL=maildir:~/Maildir gdb /tmp/imap" load the ACL plugin so I assume that is why it does not crash; not getting any log either from that, maybe I made a
2007 Oct 27
2
dovecot 1.1b4 not listing public folder children
ACL plugin still disabled. The folders listed below definitely do have Children. telnet session problem example in 1.1b4: * OK Dovecot ready. ? login mcdouga9 password ? OK Logged in. 9 LIST "" "#shared/decs/%" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "#shared/decs/support" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "#shared/decs/receipts" * LIST (\HasNoChildren)
2007 Oct 27
4
do 1.1b4 assertion failed: (mailbox_list_is_valid_existing_name
I think this is where I left off last weekend. Instead of this happening at the base of one of my shared mail namespaces, it happens when I try to select a top level folder inside the namespace, or try to directly select an entire path to a folder. This only happens when ACL is enabled. Let me know if I need to provide more. Thanks. Oct 27 16:03:27 gribble dovecot: IMAP(mcdouga9): file
2007 May 07
6
Dovecot not handling r/o mailboxes completely, and problem with ACL as a workaround
First of all, I think dovecot is really fantastic and I have thanks for all the hard work. I think it will be the best fit for my ~5000 users when I have it setup completely. We normally have approx 500 concurrent IMAP connections during the day. I am trying to convert from courier-imap to dovecot, but I have an issue with public namespace folders that are not writable by certain users.
2008 Jan 23
2
PATCH: compile dovecot-1.1.beta14 with gcc 2.95
Hi, I patched dovecot-1.1.beta14 to compile under gcc 2.95. __builtin_expect and __attribute__((malloc)) are only available since gcc 3.0, and __builtin_types_compatible_p since 3.1. Also the flexible array members (char a[]) are not available for gcc 2.95. So I replaced them with zero-extent arrays (char a[0]), which should also work, but that is gcc specific. A general pointer (char* a) should
2008 Jan 25
2
proxy logging
Hi, I'm testing dovecot 1.1.beta14 on two debian etch with drbd+ocfs2[active/active], I use qmail+vpopmail(userdb) and three front-end with openbsd 4.2 with dovecot 1.1.beta14 as proxy with passdb sql through vpopmail database. Is posible to add logs into vpopmail.vlog from proxys?, like "update vlog blah blah..." or in other sql database? I tried with post login scripting but I
2007 Oct 27
2
Segfault when opening a public folder, dovecot 1.1 beta4
I was trying to debug this with gdb, but I'm not sure how to make env MAIL=maildir:~/Maildir MAIL_PLUGINS=acl ACL=vfile gdb /tmp/imap understand the #shared/decs namespace from below so I can SELECT it. I have a number of maildirs under #ahared/decs, I tried opening at least 2 of them but dovecot gives sig 11 without a direct error about the problem. I don't think this was exactly the
2009 Aug 29
2
Quick and dirty server optimized for IMAP upload speed?
Early next week I need to upload over 100,000 emails to an IMAP server as quickly as possible from an Outlook client. I am looking for any methods I can use to (temporarily?) speed up the rate at which dovecot can accept and store IMAP uploads, whether it be storing on local disk, ram disk, etc. I can setup a temporary server on a laptop for example and once the upload has finished I can use
2007 May 25
2
Quick question on multiple access to dovecot indexes
I have up to 4 servers that will run dovecot behind a load balancer, which means the same user might be accessing the same mailbox from multiple servers, and it seems like dovecot doesn't like multiple access to the dovecot indexes for the one user since I currently have them stored in a nfs home directory. Is this a bad thing? Must I keep a seperate index location per server? Just today
2007 Oct 21
2
two small low importance issues in 1.1b
Item 1: I store the indexes and control in their own directory. I noticed in 1.1: 1192 ./private/indexes/.INBOX 32 ./private/indexes/.Trash 1228 ./private/indexes 4 ./private/control/.INBOX/.INBOX 84 ./private/control/.INBOX 4 ./private/control/.Trash/.Trash 12 ./private/control/.Trash 100 ./private/control 1332 ./private .INBOX/.INBOX and .Trash/.Trash
2007 Nov 21
3
Users w/o acl access appear to be subscribed to public folders (1.1b8)
I noticed this today, I had a user outside of our department test out dovecot. They were using squirrelmail and I noticed that dovecot thinks this user is subscribed to ALL public folders even though a dovecot ACL prevents all access. I'm pretty sure access is still denied. I was able to reproduce this with a guest account I added: l lsub "" "#shared/decs/%" * LSUB
2007 Nov 06
3
Various uidlist and index errors with 1.1 on NFS
Two nights ago I took a leap and extended my testing of dovecot 1.1 by replacing 1.0 for the approx 15 users I had on 1.0. At that time I also for the first time tried dovecot 1.1 in a load balanced 2 server configuration with indexes on NFS. I was hoping I did this right, using the mail_nfs params and 1.1 so fchown etc would flush the access cache, but I am getting a number of messages and
2008 Jun 19
2
sig11 in 1.1rc5 fts
This happened from one user near noon on the 17th and 19th (today) of this month. From the backtrace it looks like they were searching, but I won't know for sure unless I need to ask them. Is this possibly fixed already? I just haven't upgraded dovecot in a while due to lack of problems. The sig11 happened a few dozen times, a few seconds apart each day. I have one coredump from
2007 May 24
2
dovecot-shared tries to fchown index+control files but fails
I have some public mailboxes setup in 1.0.0, location = maildir:/egr/mail/shared/org:CONTROL=%h/Maildir/dovecot/public/control/org:INDEX=%h/Maildir/dovecot/public/indexes/org I also have a dovecot-shared file in the maildir folders so messages that are added to the inbox get a decent set of default permissions. However, I think dovecot is also trying to fchown the index files (stored in a user
2007 Nov 17
1
crash with fts_squat on an identified email
I have some folders with a good amount of spam. While demonstrating full text search to a user, we found a folder that would crash dovecot while doing a fts. While splitting up the mailbox to narrow it down, I found there are a good number of messages in that folder that all made it crash in the same manner. I figured I'd narrow down a single one, get that fixed, then retest the rest. I