similar to: Custom 'quota exceeded' message + Sieve script from database

Hi, We have dovecot 1.1.20 running on Fedora 7 with mail and indexes on NFS. On our delivery server we are getting "status=bounced (Command died with signal 6: "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver")" We are fetching these mails from another server which has Centos 5.2 installed. We have mail_nfs*=yes and mmap_disable=yes settings in dovecot.conf. Please let me know why the

Deliver from latest 1.1 HG with sieve also from latest 1.1 HG is dying with an assertion failure when it delivers to my mailbox. Other mailboxes on the same system are unaffected, but I can read my mailbox fine through IMAP. Dovecot and sieve were compiled with -march=nocona -pipe -ggdb I've commented out my entire sieve script and the problem still occurs. file index-mail-headers.c: line

I just transferred the files in my home directory from an x86_64 machine to an i686 machine. This included the .dovecot.sieve and .dovecot.sievec files in my home root, and the Dovecot index files in my ~/Maildir directory. Everything seemed to be working until I tried sending an email that triggers a Sieve "redirect" command, then I got the following in the logs. I then tried

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta2.tar.gz.sig Several bug/crashfixes. deliver now supports -a parameter (see http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA) which allows Sieve plugin v1.1.2 to use envelope :detail "to" checks. I also did one more API change for mailbox_transaction_commit*(). There's probably something

Hi, I am trying dovecot-1.1 with dovecot-sieve-1.1. First, dovecot -n do not report about deliver settings. They are: --- protocol lda { postmaster_address = postmaster at parkheights.dyndns.org hostname = parkheights.dyndns.org mail_plugins = cmusieve mail_plugin_dir = /usr/lib64/dovecot11/modules/lda sendmail_path = /usr/lib/sendmail auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot11/auth-master

I think someone else mentioned this problem earlier on the list, and I've recently started seeing the following error show up: file index-transaction.c: line 54 (index_transaction_finish_rollback): assertion failed: (t->mail_ref_count == 0) Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver(i_syslog_fatal_handler+0x2b) [0x80bff0b] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver [0x80bfd1a] ->

Hi, I am posting my question to both storage-discuss and zfs-discuss as I am not quite sure what is causing the messages I am receiving. I have recently migrated my zfs volume from b104 to b134 and upgraded it from zfs version 14 to 22. It consist of two zvol''s ''vol01/zvol01'' and ''vol01/zvol02''. During zpool import I am getting a non-zero exit code,

You could hardcode a register for the pseudo instruction to use in the td file. The register allocator will make sure not to clobber it. let uses = [ R1 ], defs = [ R1 ] in { def MYINST : Pseudo<> } On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:25 AM Przemyslaw Ossowski via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I have one more question regarding expanding pseudo instruction. > >

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 2:48 PM Przemyslaw Ossowski < przemyslaw.ossowski at googlemail.com> wrote: > Thanks Mehdi for the suggestion. > I want to customize handling of 'load' instruction during processing DAG, > but on IR level I want the 'load' to be treated in different passes as > common load. So I'm afraid that replacing 'load' with Intrinsic

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 3:51 PM Przemyslaw Ossowski via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > as I wrote in mu previous post I wanted to somehow mark one IR instruction > (in this particular case it would be 'load') during dedicated pass, which > will set the marking based on neighboring instructions. Next I wanted to > somehow to convey this marking

Hi, for DAG-to-DAG instruction selection I’ve implemented a pattern, which creates from one SDNode two instructions, something like: def: Pat<(NEW_SDNODE REG:$r1), (INST_OUT (INST_IN), REG:$r1)>; where INST_IN doesn't accepts any inputs and INST_OUT accepts two inputs - one returned by INST_IN and REG;$r1. Is there any possibility to ‘Glue’ two instruction created

Hi, I'm a teacher and I have got 20 computers with Windows XP and server Windows SBS 2003 with Active Directory. I use AD to set policy tu WinXP and to authorize users. Is it possible to set up Samba to this instead AD? Can someone help me in this? -- Przemyslaw Adam Smiejek

Thank you Craig for explanation. Could be the same algorithm used for custom legalizing given node in LowerOperation and ReplaceNodeResults in case results and inputs of the node are illegal? Or actually such situation is impossible and for given node either LowerOperation or ReplaceNodeResults can be only called? Przemek wt., 28 sty 2020, 18:48 użytkownik Craig Topper <craig.topper at

Hello, I’m looking for the best approach which would allow for marking given LLVM IR instruction during IR custom pass and later utilizing that information during DAG Instruction Selection in order to match given pattern based on this marking. I’m wondering if marking IR instruction utilizing Metadata is good idea. But how later pass that information to DAG and appropriately mark in

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm maintainer of managesieve's FreeBSD port. (cc to dovecot's port maintainer) Stephan, do you plan to make available a 1.1.4 specific patch ? Dovecot's port assume that managesieve patch include dovecot's version number: so it may help the port's upgrade process. (seems that 1.1.3's patch is applying smoothly)

I''m using WEBrick and Oracle. I have a Oracle connection limit of 8. On the 9th click in of the application I get an oracle error stating I have exceeded the connection limit. "ORA-02391: exceeded simultaneous SESSIONS_PER_USER limit". It seems that rails is not reusing connections..... I started with a limit of 5 and the dba gave me three more. Blake -- Posted via

I have a situation here where a user has an AAstra 480i phone, which function corectly. The phone is behing a nat-router (a linksys wrv200 for it's VPN point to point facility). The phone is plugued in a port wich has qos enabled. And when the user places a call, sometimes (not always), we get this in the console : [May 8 13:41:55] WARNING[5804]: chan_sip.c:1948 retrans_pkt: Maximum

I am trying to get Samba to connect to a LDAP server. I am using Samba 3. When I start Samba, the following error is in the smbd.log: [2004/02/22 16:53:10, 2] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1066) smbldap_search_suffix: searching for: [(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=IS))] [2004/02/22 16:53:10, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open_connection(530) ldap_initialize: Time limit

I just got lots and lots of this: kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded; see tuning(7) However, tuning(7) on my system has no information about this tunable whatsoever. anglepoise:~ % uname -a FreeBSD anglepoise.lon.incunabulum.net 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #3: Tue Nov 4 15:40:44 GMT 2008 root@anglepoise.lon.incunabulum.net:/home/obj/usr/src/sys/ANGLEPOISE7 amd64 anglepoise:~ %

You have reached the storage limit on your mailbox, You will not be able to send or receive new mail until you updrade your email account. click the below link to fill your emaill upgrade form within 24hours. http://off.st/adminhelp System Administrator 192.168.0.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to