similar to: Writing static HTML?

How can I get RoR to display html pulled directly from a database, without converting the tags. (e.g. if "<h1>Hello</h1>" is stored (as text) in a database, how can I get RoR NOT to corvert it to "&lt;h1&gt;Hello</h1>", but instead to just pass the tags along so that "Hello" displays in bold. I''m sure it''s just a

I''m using RedCloth for a forum type app. I want users to have control over the look of their posts, but within limits. For example, I don''t want them to be able to include images or use header tags. The RedCloth documentation is pretty thin and I don''t feel it''s very explanatory. I''m wondering if there''s any easy way to do this? Or do I

Move the interal static libraries as the last items in the list of libraries of guestfsd, to make sure their symbols are used for all the other libraries. This is because GCC resolves the symbols looking at the arguments from the beginning to the end of the command line. This currently does not cause failures, however it "just works" because of the tricky situation set up. The

I tried to use a before_save and use simple_format, it returns and undefined method error. Can I even use these methods within a model? I tried to use auto_link and it failed too. What am I doing wrong? Furthermore, would it be recommended I format text before saving it to the database? Advantages or disadvantages? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

We have a test that looks like this… define void @array16_store() { ; CHECK-LABEL: array16_store: ; CHECK: ldi [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], 204 ; CHECK: ldi [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], 170 ; CHECK: sts int.array+3, [[REG2]] ; CHECK: sts int.array+2, [[REG1]] ; CHECK: ldi [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], 187 ; CHECK: ldi [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], 170 ; CHECK: sts int.array+1, [[REG2]] ; CHECK: sts int.array, [[REG1]] ; CHECK: ldi

I''m running Windows XP Pro on a not-so-new machine, Pentium 4 2.4GHz with 512 RAM. I''ve got Apache 2 installed and I''m using FastCGI to run Typo in development mode while I design a theme for it. But it''s slow, very slow. Inconsistently slow. If I reload a page, sometimes it happens pretty quickly. Sometimes it takes more than a minute. Sometimes it

One problem that has been vexing me of late: It seems that whenever I run into a problem that requires debugging one of my programs in gdb, before I can do that I have to fix my frontend's broken generation of debugging info. The code that generates debugging information is quite fragile - you have to generate metadata for each of your files, classes, and functions, and do so without error,

Philip Reames via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > A challenge we already have - as in, I've broken these tests and had to > fix them - is that an end to end test which checks either IR or assembly > ends up being extraordinarily fragile.  Completely unrelated profitable > transforms create small differences which cause spurious test failures.  > This is

Talin, If there is a magic wand, I would be interested to know! DIDescriptor.Verify() is not suitable for you needs. It checks structure of encoded debug info after optimizer has modified the IR. Its main goal is inform Dwarf writer, at the end of code gen, which IR construct it should ignore. If you want to test code gen you have to link compiled code and run it regularly. That's what

Hi, I am having trouble getting \alt (or \altenv) to work with Schunk/Sinput and was wondering if anybody had had success? With the slide \begin{frame}[fragile]\frametitle{Basic R} \alt<2>{ <<echo=TRUE>>= 2+2 @ }{ <<echo=TRUE, eval=FALSE>>= 2+2 @ } \end{frame} I get the error message: ! FancyVerb Error: Extraneous input `> 2+2 \end {Sinput} \end

I would like to set the 'xlab' on the 'upper' x axis. The following code shows roughly what I want by way of (one possible) expected behaviour. par(mar=c(5.1, 4.1, 5.1, 2.1)) plot(rnorm(10), rnorm(10), xlab="the lower one") axis(3, xlab="the upper one????") There are various other ways that could be expected to work, but hopefully the above is clear enough to

Dear [R] and beamer community, I am trying to build a presentation using beamer and [R]. I can Sweave the file; however, when I run pdflatex on the file i get the following error: ! FancyVerb Error: Extraneous input `> a = 123450 > b = -0.69 \end {Sinput} \end {Schunk} \end { beamer at frameslide}\ifbeamer at twoscreenstext \beamer at dosecondscreennow {{fragile} \frametitle

Man my app is causing me so much grief lately. Okay let''s say I have: class Discussion has_many :posts end class Post belongs_to :discussion acts_as_tree end Then let''s say I grab a discussion object and try to eager load all of its posts: discussion = Discussion.find(:first, :include => [:posts]) Seems simple enough and it grabs an entire tree of posts. However:

> That makes it fragile, and that’s why I disagree with your “90% done” assessment. > What if the service behing the hook is down for a few days? In the long-term view, a pretty trivial catch-up script ought to be able to synthesize a sane history after any amount of down-time. People could even run it locally for their bisecting needs if it was that important to them. In the short term, I

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:33:06AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > Checking for file existence for filters is somewhat less fragile than > for plugins, because all filters are built in-tree (we've specifically > documented that we don't provide ABI guarantees for filters, so the only > sane way to use a filter is to compile it at the same time/version as > the nbdkit binary that

I have two problems. I have a comment that has_many uploads. Before saving the comment, I want to be sure that the upload(s) has passed validation, but I also need to validate in other ways. For example, I do not want to save the comment if there is no comment or upload. Or, I do not want to save the comment if the image has been uploaded previously (comparing md5s with past upload md5s

I have a forum-type application. The Board model has many comments, the Comments model acts as a tree. So I have a board with multiple comments, some comments are parent comments and there are comments that belong to a parent comment, making up a thread. Like most forums, I want it so that threads are sorted based on the date of their last comment. But I have no idea how to specify this in

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Bostjan Skufca wrote: > Are you connecting by specifying "ssh HOSTNAME" instead of "ssh IP.IP.IP.IP"? > > If this is the case, then "Host 192.168.*.*" line never matches when > you think it should. > > From ssh_config manpage: > "The host is the hostname argument given on the command line (i.e. the > name is not

Could dwarfdump --verify be used to check the debug info? - Jan ________________________________ From: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> To: Talin <viridia at gmail.com> Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Thu, March 17, 2011 9:41:10 AM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Writing unit tests for DWARF? Talin, If there is a magic wand, I would be interested

I’m not sure if it’s truly deterministic. It always gives the same results (so far) on my machine but I’m not sure that’s enough. My guess is it’s probably going to be deterministic on one machine but might well not be deterministic across environments. Like it might give varying results if cross compiled on different hosts, macOS vs intel Linux vs arm vs s390. (Obviously AVR is always a cross